A participative method to build bridges between sustainability science and anticipatory governance at Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve (Basque Country)

  1. Manu Monge-Ganuzas
  2. Igor Ahedo Gurrutxaga
  3. Iraide Álvarez Muguruza
  4. Imanol Telleria
Revista:
Oñati socio-legal series

ISSN: 2079-5971

Año de publicación: 2023

Título del ejemplar: Innovación legislativa en tiempos de excepcionalidad

Volumen: 13

Número: 2

Páginas: 490-535

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1391 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Oñati socio-legal series

Resumen

Un objetivo clave de la gobernanza es la traducción del conocimiento en planificación. Para ello, reclutamos a 125 representantes de la sociedad, de la comunidad técnico-política y de la científica, para que tomaran parte en un proceso de participación centrado en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai. Analizamos sus testimonios utilizando métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos, incluido el Análisis de Contenidos Cualitativos Asistido por Ordenador. Validamos consensos para la gestión futura y detallamos criterios para una gobernanza sostenible, colaborativa y anticipatoria. Los consensos que los participantes han destacado como más importantes han sido los siguientes: 1. Urdaibai debe trabajar por el bienestar y la prosperidad de sus habitantes. 2. Son necesarias sinergias entre las instituciones y la sociedad a través de estrategias de participación. 3. Es importante contar con un liderazgo político que oriente la gobernanza. Podemos afirmar que el proceso participativo llevado a cabo ha permitido a los participantes expresar horizontes compartidos sobre estrategias de futuro. Presentamos la metodología de este proceso, así como, sus resultados, ya que consideramos que ambos pueden ser de utilidad para los gestores de las áreas protegidas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahedo, I., and Telleria, I., 2020. Neoliberalismo. In: J. Anton and X. Torrens, eds. Ideologías y movimientos políticos contemporáneos. Madrid: Tecnos, 370–419.
  • Ahedo, I., 2022. When the Cinderellas unite. International Journal of Action Research [online], 18(1), 28–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i1.04 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Alberdi, J., Arreskurrinaga, E., and Oianguren, M., 2020. Explorando visiones compartidas y procesos alternativos en la reserva de la biosfera de Urdaibai (País Vasco). Ecosistemas, revista científica de ecología y medio ambiente [online], 29(1),1940. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.1940 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Arnanz, L., 2018. Metodologías de la democracia participativa para la coproducción de políticas públicas locales: hacia un sistema de gestión participativo [online]. Thesis (PhD). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Available from: https://eprints.ucm.es/ 51657/1/T40950.pdf [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Basque Government, 2015. Plan para la interpretación, investigación, capacitación y educación para el desarrollo sostenible en la Reserva de la Biosfera de Urdaibai 2015–2025 [Plan for the Interpretation, Research, Training and Education for the Sustainable Development of the Urdaibai Biosphere Reserve 2015–2025] (online). VitoriaGasteiz: Department of Environment and Territorial Policy. Available from: https://issuu.com/ingurumena/docs/pice [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Bevir, M., and Rhodes, R., 2016. Rethinking Governance. Ruling, Rationales, and Resistance. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Blanco, I., Gomà, R., and Subirats, J., 2018. El nuevo municipalismo: derecho a la ciudad y comunes urbanos. Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas [online], 10(20), 14–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10491 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Boston, J., 2019. Enhancing anticipatory governance: strategies for mitigating political myopia in environmental planning and policy-making. In: S. Davoudi et al., eds., Routledge companion to environmental planning. London: Routledge, 130–140.
  • Bowen, G.A., 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal [online], 9(2), 27–40. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Brenner, N., 1998. Global cities, global states: Global city formation and state territorial restructuring in contemporary Europe. Review of international political economy [online], 5(1), 1–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347633 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Chowdhury, M.F., 2014. Coding, sorting and sifting of qualitative data analysis: debates and discussion, Quality and Quantity [online], 49, 1135–1143. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0039-2 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Dobbin, K., and Lubell, M., 2019. Collaborative governance and environmental justice: disadvantaged community representation in California sustainable groundwater management. Policy Studies Journal [online], 49(2), 562–590. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12375 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Döös, M., and Wilhelmson, L., 2012. Proximity and distance: phases of intersubjective qualitative data analysis in a research team, Quality and Quantity [online], 48, 1089–1106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9816-y [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Dunsire, A., 1993. Modes of Governance. In: J. Kooiman, ed., Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage, 21–35.
  • Flick, U., Von Kardoff, E., and Steinke, I., eds., 2004. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage.
  • Font, J., and Galais, C., 2011. The Qualities of Local Participation: The Explanatory Role of Ideology, External Support and Civil Society as Organizer. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research [online], 35(5), 932–948. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01018.x [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Fuerth, L., 2009. Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight [online], 11(4), 14–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680910982412 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Ganuza, E., et al., 2010. Democracia en acción. Una visión desde las metodologías participativas [online]. Madrid: Antígona. Available from: http://hdl.handle. net/10261/79311 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • García-Espín, P., and Jiménez, M., 2017. Los procesos participativos como potenciadores de la democracia. Explorando los efectos, mecanismos y evidencias en la sociedad-civil. Revista de Estudios Políticos [online], 177, 113–146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.177.04 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., et al., 2009. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics [online], 69(6), 1209–1218. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • González Medina, M., and Huete García, M., 2018. Procesos de agenda y políticas de desarrollo urbano: centrando la cuestión. Gestión y análisis de políticas públicas [online], 10(20), 6–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i20.10594 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Granjou, C., Walker, J., and Salazar, J., 2017. The politics of anticipation: on knowing and governing environmental futures. Futures [online], 92, 5–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.007 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Guston, D., 2014. Understanding “anticipatory governance. Social Studies of Science [online], 44(2), 218–242. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713508669 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Hanafi, S., 2020. Global sociology revisited: Towards new directions. Current Sociology [online], 68(1), 3–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392119869051 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Hart, S.L., 2010. Capitalism at the crossroads: Next generation business strategies for a postcrisis world. London: Pearson.
  • Heikkila, T., and Gerlak, A.K., 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Studies Journal [online], 33(4), 583–612. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00134.x [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Helbing, D., 2013. Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature [online], 497(7447), 51–59. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12047 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Hoffmann, A., and Sgrò, C., 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature [online] 470, 479–485. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Ibarra, P., 2011. Democracia relacional. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
  • Innerarity, D., 2020. Una teoría de la democracia compleja: Gobernar en el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.
  • Irwin, A., 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science [online], 10(1), 1–18. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3109/a036852 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Isaksen, L.W., Devi, S.U., and Hochschild, A.R., 2008. Global Care Crisis: A Problem of Capital, Care Chain, or Commons? American Behavioral Scientist [online], 52(3), 405–425. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208323513 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Jessop, B., 1998. The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: The Case of Economic Development. International Social Science Journal [online], 50(155), 29–45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12186 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Jessop, B., 2016. The state: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Ji, H., 2019. How do different types of local governments sustainability programs relate to their environmental outcomes. Policy Studies Journal [online], 48(4), 1023–1053. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12363 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Kooiman, J., 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.
  • Krippendorff, K., 2004. Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality and Quantity [online], 38, 787–800. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11135-004-8107-7 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Layzer, J., ed., 2008. Natural Experiments: Ecosystem-Based Management and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Le Galès, P., 2010. Gouvernance. In: L. Boussaguet, ed., Dictionnaire des politiques publiques. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  • Leach, W., et al., 2013. Fostering learning through collaboration: knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory [online], 24(3), 591–622. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut011 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Mackensen, K., and Wille, U., 1999. Qualitative text analysis supported by conceptual data systems. Quality and Quantity [online], 33, 135–156. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004305723553 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Macnaghten P., et al., 2014. Resposible innovation across borders: tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. Journal of Responsible Innovation [online], 1(2), 191–199. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922249 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Marchioni, M., 2018. Planificación social y organización de la comunidad: Alternativas avanzadas a la crisis. Madrid: Popular.
  • Martín-Lopez, B., Gómez-Baggethun, E., and Montes, C., 2009. Un marco conceptual para la gestión de las interacciones naturaleza-sociedad en un mundo cambiante. Cuides: Cuaderno Interdisciplinar de desarrollo sostenible [online], vol. 3, 229–258. Available from: https://www.publicacionescajamar.es/publicacionesperiodicas/cuaderno-interdisciplinar-de-desarrollo-sostenible-cuides/3/478 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Massaua, M., Thomas, C., and Klinger, T., 2016. The use of science in collaborative management of marine environments. Coastal Management [online], 44(6), 606– 627. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2016.1233797 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C., 2001. The dynamics of contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Morse, J.M., and Chung, S.E., 2003. Toward Holism: The Significance of Methodological Pluralism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [online], 2(3), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200302 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Muiderman, K., et al., 2020. Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: Different conceptions of the future and implications for the present. Wires Climate Change [online], 11(6), 673. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.673 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Onaindia, M., et al., 2013. Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation. Forest Ecology and Management [online], 289, 1– 9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.010 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Osborne, S., and Strokosch, K., 2013. It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Coproduction of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management [online], 24(S1), 31–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12010 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Ostrom, E., 2009. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. 5095 [online]. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/4287 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Ostrom, E., 2010. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review [online], 100(3), 641–672. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Parés, F.M., 2017. Repensar la participación de la ciudadanía en el mundo local. Diputación de Barcelona.
  • Pérez Orozco, A., 2006. Perspectivas feministas en torno a la economía: el caso de los cuidados. Madrid: Consejo Económico y Social.
  • Peters, V., and Wester, F., 2006. How qualitative data analysis software may support the qualitative analysis process. Quality and Quantity [online], 41, 635–659. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9016-8 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Pierre, J., 1999. Models of Urban Governance: The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics. Urban Affairs Review [online], 34(3), 372–396. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/10780879922183988 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Pierre, J., 2000. Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford University Press.
  • Poteete, A., Janssen, M., and Ostrom, E., 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press.
  • Rhodes, R., 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies [online], 44(4), 652–667. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9248.1996.tb01747.x [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Rofes, J., et al., 2014. The long paleoenvironmental sequence of Santimamiñe (Bizkaia, Spain): 20,000 years of small mammal record from the latest Late Pleistocene to the middle Holocene. Quaternary International [online], vols. 339–340, 62–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2013.05.048 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Shrivastava, P., et al., 2020. Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. One Earth [online], 2(4), 329–340. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Sintomer, Y., 2007. Le pouvoir au peuple: Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte.
  • Steffen, W., et al., 2015. Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science [online], 347(6223), 1259855. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Stutzer, A., and Frey, B., 2006. Political participation and procedural utility: an empirical study. European Journal of Political Research [online], 45(3), 391–418. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00303.x [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Subirats, J., 2016. El poder de lo próximo: Las virtudes del municipalismo. Madrid: Catarata.
  • Subirats, J., Parés, M., and Blanco, I., 2009. Calidad democrática y redes de gobernanza: evaluar la participación desde el análisis de las políticas públicas. In: M. Parés, ed., Evaluando las nuevas formas de democracia participativa. Barcelona: Ariel, pp. 367–398.
  • Swyngedouw, E., 1996. The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism [online], 7(2), 65–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358679 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Telleria, I., and Ahedo, I., 2016. Movimientos urbanos y democratización en la ciudad: una propuesta de análisis. Revista Española de Ciencia Política [online], 40, 91–115. Available from: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/38534 [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Toimila, A., et al., 2020. Addressing the challenges of climate change risks and adaptation in coastal areas: A review. Coastal Engineering, vol. 156, 103611.
  • Van der Meer, T.W.G., and Van Ingen, E.J., 2008. Schools of democracy? Disentangling the relationship between civic participation and political action in 17 European countries. European Journal of Political Research [online], 48(2), 281–308. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x [Access 19 July 2022].
  • Zalasiewicz, J., et al., 2015. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary International [online], vol. 383, 196–203. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.quaint.2014.11.045 [Access 19 July 2022].
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet