Smart Rural Communities for the Agenda 2030: Action Research, Living Labs, and SDGs

  1. Calzada, Igor 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Libro:
Contemporary Rural Development Programs

Editorial: IntechOpen

ISSN: 2753-6580

Año de publicación: 2023

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.111909 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

This chapter contributes to the discussion on contemporary rural development programs, with a focus on their alignment with the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the Global South. The study examines an action research project led by Ayuda En Acción, in collaboration with co-operatives under the Mondragon Co-operative Corporation (MCC) such as Mundukide Foundation, Alecop, and LKS. The research was conducted in postconflict rural areas in Colombia’s Bolivar region and remote rural settlements in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province. The intervention aimed to engage local communities by incorporating information and communication technologies (ICTs) for the well-being of rural residents. This chapter presents the action research fieldwork, critical analysis of the smart cities’ hegemonic discourse, and final recommendations while introducing the concept of Smart Rural Communities (SRC). The research question asks how to establish the SRC framework as an international cooperation model that meets the SDGs. The chapter includes an (i) introduction, (ii) literature review, (iii) presentation of the fieldwork in Colombia and Mozambique, (iv) findings through a SWOT analysis, and (v) final policy recommendations for the SRC framework. The SRC framework provides valuable insights for international cooperation models to achieve the SDGs in rural areas, particularly in the Global South.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bradbury H. How to Do Action Research for Transformations: At a Time of Eco-Social Crisis. Chentelham: Edward Elgar; 2022
  • Bennett H, Brunner R. Nurturing the buffer zone: Conducting collaborative action research in contemporary contexts. Qualitative Research. 2020;22(1):74-92. DOI: 10.177/1468794120965373
  • Lewin K. Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues. 1946;2(4):34-46. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
  • Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D. Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. London: Jossey-Bass; 1985
  • Bradbury H. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. London: SAGE; 2015
  • Almirall E, Lee M, Wareham J. Mapping living labs in the landscape of innovation methodologies. Technology Innovation Management Review. 2012;2(9):12-18
  • Calzada I. From smart cities to experimental cities? In: VMB Giorgino and Z Walsh. Co-Designing Economies in Transition: Radical Approaches in Dialogue with Contemplative Social Sciences. Cham: Springer; 2018
  • Aurigi A, Odendaal NF. “Smart in the box” to “smart in the City”: Rethinking the socially sustainable Smart City in context. Journal of Urban Technology. 2020;28:1-16. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2019.1704203
  • Christl W. How companies collect, combine, analyze, trade, and use personal data on billions. A Report by. In: Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life. Toronto: Cracked Labs; 2017
  • Hollands RG. Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2014;8(1):61-77. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu011
  • Kummitha RKR. Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2018;137:330-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.010
  • Sadowski J, Bendor R. Selling smartness: Corporate narratives and the Smart City as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 2018;44:540-563. DOI: 10.1177/0162243918806061
  • Söderström O, Paasche T, Klauser F. Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City. 2014;18(3):307-320. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716
  • Tooran A. Crowdsourced smart cities versus corporate smart cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;158(1):012046
  • Chisnall M. Digital slavery, time for abolition? Policy Studies. 2020;41:1-19. DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2020.1724926
  • Graham M, Ojanpera S, Anwar MA, Friederici N. Digital connectivity and African knowledge economies. Questions de Communication. 2017;32:345-360
  • Karvonen A, Cugurullo F, Caprotti F. Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. London: Routledge; 2018
  • Parnell S, Robinson J. (Re)theorizing cities from the global south: Looking beyond neoliberalism. Urban Geography. 2012;33(4):593-617. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.4.593
  • Lytras M, Visvizi A. Who uses Smart City services and what to make of it: Toward interdisciplinary smart cities research. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1998
  • Lytras MD, Visvizi A. Sustainable smart cities and smart villages research: Rethinking security, safety, well-being and happiness. Sustainability. 2020;12:215
  • Visvizi A, Daniela L, Chen C-W. Beyond the ICT- and sustainability hypes: A case for quality education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;107:106304. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106304
  • Visvizi A, Lytras M. It’s not a fad: Smart cities and smart villages research in European and global contexts. Sustainability. 2018;10(8):2727
  • Odendaal N. Splintering urbanism or Split agendas? Examining the spatial distribution of technology access in relation to ICT policy in Durban, South Africa. Urban Studies. 2011;48(11):2375-2397. DOI: 10.1177/0042098010388951
  • Moulaert F, MacCallum D. Advanced Introduction to Social Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2019
  • Moulaert F, Jessop B, Swyngedouw E, Simmons L, Van den Broeck P. Political Change through Social Innovation. Chentelham: Edward Elgar; 2022
  • Young Foundation. How can social innovation help rural communities? 2017. Available from: https://youngfoundation.org/workwithcommunities/can-social-innovation-help-rural-communities/ [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • Mhembwe S, Dube E. The role of cooperatives in sustaining the livelihoods of rural communities: The case of rural cooperatives in Shurugwi District, Zimbabwe. Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. 2017;9(1):1-9. DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v9i1.341
  • Visvizi A, Lytras M. Editorial. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. 2020;14(2):125-131. DOI: 10.1108/TG-05-2020-128
  • Bignami F, Calzada I, Hanakata N, Tomasello F. Data-driven citizenship regimes in contemporary urban scenarios: An introduction. Citizenship Studies. 2022;27(2):145-159. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2022.2147262
  • Calzada I. Emerging digital citizenship regimes: Pandemic, algorithmic, liquid, metropolitan, and stateless citizenships. Citizenship Studies. 2022;27(2):160-188. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2021.2012312
  • Calzada I. Will Covid-19 be the end of the global citizen? Apolitical. 2020. Available from: https://apolitical.co/solution-articles/en/will-covid-19-be-the-end-of-the-global-citizen. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11942.27208/1
  • Keith M, Calzada I. European urban living labs As Experimental City-to-City-learning platforms. In: Bridging European Urban Transformations. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2017
  • von Wirth T, Fuenfschilling L, Frantzeskaki N, Coenen L. Impacts of urban living labs on sustainability transitions: Mechanisms and strategies for systemic change through experimentation. European Planning Studies. 2018;27:1-29. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895
  • Zavratnik V, Superina A, Stojmenova Duh E. Living labs for rural areas: Contextualization of living lab frameworks, concepts and practices. Sustainability. 2019;11(14):3797
  • SDR. 2018. Available from: http://www.sdgindex.org/[Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • Temmer J. Four Ways Cities are Localizing the SDGs. 2018. Available from: https://www.iisd.org/blog/four-ways-cities-are-localizing-sdgs [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • UN-Habitat. Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. Nairobi: UN; 2016
  • UN-Habitat. ONU adopta los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible: Las ciudades ganan más enfoque. 2017. Available from: https://es.unhabitat.org/onu-adopta-los-objetivos-de-desarrollo-sostenible-las-ciudades-ganan-mas-enfoque/ [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • UN-Habitat. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. 2017. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=10009 [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • UN-Habitat. Sustainable Cities Dialogue: Urban Governance at the Core of the Implementation of SDG11. Strasbourg: UN; 2018
  • UN-Habitat. Smart & Resilient Cities. 2017. Available from: https://www.smartresilient.com/un-habitat [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • Calzada I, Cobo C. Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City. Journal of Urban Technology. 2015;22(1):23-43. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2014.971535
  • Scholl C. Guidelines for Urban Labs. Brussels: URB@Exp project 2014–2017: JPI Urban Europe; 2017
  • Bühler MM, Calzada I, Cane I, Jelinek T, Kapoor A, Mannan M, et al. Unlocking the Power of Digital Commons: Data Cooperatives as a Pathway for Data Sovereign, Innovative and Equitable Digital Communities. 2023. Preprints.org. Available from: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202304.0130/v1. 2023040130. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202304.0130.v1
  • Keith, M, Calzada I. Back to the “Urban Commons”? Social Innovation through New Co-operative Forms in Europe. 2018. Available from: http://www.urbantransformations.ox.ac.uk/blog/2018/back-to-the-urban-commons-social-innovation-through-new-co-operative-forms-in-europe/ [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • Mudarra F. Cuando lo ‘Smart’ llega a las zonas rurales. 2018. Available from: https://ethic.es/2018/04/cuando-lo-smart-llega-a-las-zonas-rurales/ [Accessed: April 10, 2023]
  • Robin E, Steenmans K, Acuto M. Harnessing inclusive urban knowledge for the implementation of the New Urban Agenda, Urban Research & Practice. 2019;12(2):137-155. DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2017.1414870
  • Barakabitze AA, Fue KG, Sanga CA. The use of participatory approaches in developing ICT-based Systems for Disseminating Agricultural Knowledge and Information for farmers in developing countries: The case of Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries. 2017;78(1):1-23. DOI: 10.1002/J.1681-4835.2017.TB00576.x
  • Rochman GP, Odah IC, Sakti F. Understanding the smart society in rural development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2020;447:012016. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/447/1/012016
  • Anastasiou E, Manika S, Ragazou K, Katsios I. Territorial and human geography challenges: How can smart villages support rural development and population inclusion? Social Sciences. 2021;10:193. DOI: 10.3390/socsci10060193