Democratic Erosion of Data-Opolies: Decentralized Web3 Technological Paradigm Shift Amidst AI Disruption

  1. Calzada, Igor 12345
  1. 1 School of Social Sciences, Social Science Research Park (Sbarc/Spark), Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research and Data (WISERD), Cardiff University, Maindy Road, Cathays, Cardiff CF24 4HQ, UK
  2. 2 Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, University of the Basque Country, UPV-EHU, Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Spain
  3. 3 Basque Foundation for Science, Ikerbasque, Plaza Euskadi 5, 48009 Bilbao, Spain
  4. 4 Decentralization Research Centre, 545 King St. W, Toronto, ON W5V 1M1, Canada
  5. 5 Fulbright Scholar-In-Residence (S-I-R), US-UK Fulbright Commission, Unit 302, 3rd Floor Camelford House, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP, UK
Erakutsi afiliazioak +
Aldizkaria:
Big Data and Cognitive Computing

ISSN: 2504-2289

Argitalpen urtea: 2024

Alea: 8

Zenbakia: 3

Orrialdeak: 26

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.3390/BDCC8030026 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Big Data and Cognitive Computing

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

This article investigates the intricate dynamics of data monopolies, referred to as “data-opolies”, and their implications for democratic erosion. Data-opolies, typically embodied by large technology corporations, accumulate extensive datasets, affording them significant influence. The sustainability of such data practices is critically examined within the context of decentralized Web3 technologies amidst Artificial Intelligence (AI) disruption. Additionally, the article explores emancipatory datafication strategies to counterbalance the dominance of data-opolies. It presents an in-depth analysis of two emergent phenomena within the decentralized Web3 emerging landscape: People-Centered Smart Cities and Datafied Network States. The article investigates a paradigm shift in data governance and advocates for joint efforts to establish equitable data ecosystems, with an emphasis on prioritizing data sovereignty and achieving digital self-governance. It elucidates the remarkable roles of (i) blockchain, (ii) decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and (iii) data cooperatives in empowering citizens to have control over their personal data. In conclusion, the article introduces a forward-looking examination of Web3 decentralized technologies, outlining a timely path toward a more transparent, inclusive, and emancipatory data-driven democracy. This approach challenges the prevailing dominance of data-opolies and offers a framework for regenerating datafied democracies through decentralized and emerging Web3 technologies.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Newport, C. (2019). Digital Minimalism: Choosing a Focused Life in a Noisy World, Penguin.
  • Bridle, J. (2019). New Dark Age: Technology and the End of the Future, Verso.
  • Certomá, C., Martelozzo, F., and Iapaolo, F. (2023). Digital (Un)Sustainabilities. Promises, Contradictions, and Pitfalls of the Digitaliation-Sustainability Nexus, Routledge.
  • Harris, M. (2023). Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World, Hachette Book.
  • Digital Future Society (2023). El Acceso Digital en Las Ciudades, Entendido Como Algo Más Que un Derecho Fundamental: Por un Enfoque Integrado y Multidimensional, Digital Future Society.
  • Sjovaag, (2023), Media Commun., 11, pp. 291, 10.17645/mac.v11i2.7317
  • Cancela, E. (2023). Utopías Digitales: Imaginar el Fin del Capitalismo, Verso.
  • (2024, January 06). Crónica Vasca. Available online: https://cronicavasca.elespanol.com/economia/20240106/ekaitz-cancela-el-mercado-union-europea-perdido/822668624_0.html.
  • Carver, J. (2024). More bark than bite? European digital sovereignty discourse and changes to the European Union’s external relations policy. J. Eur. Public Policy.
  • Calzada, (2022), Citizsh. Stud., 27, pp. 160, 10.1080/13621025.2021.2012312
  • Thomason, J., Bernhardt, S., Kansara, T., and Cooper, N. (2019). Blockchain Technology for Global Social Change, IGO Global.
  • Seidler, (2017), J. Cyber Policy, 2, pp. 338, 10.1080/23738871.2017.1400084
  • Buterin, V. (2022). Proof of Stake: The Making of Ethereum and the Philosophy of Blockchains, Seven Stories.
  • De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., Nabben, K., Cossar, S., Kamalova, J., and Merk, T. (2023). Blockchain Constitutionalism: The Role of Legitimacy in Polycentric Systems, EUI.
  • Hall, A. (2023, November 01). What the History of Democracy Can Teach Us About Blockchain Governance. Available online: https://thedefiant.io/what-the-history-of-democracy-can-teach-us-about-blockchain-governance.
  • Hughes, (2019), Int. J. Int. Manag., 49, pp. 114, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.005
  • Inwood, (2023), Soc. Semiot., 33, pp. 451, 10.1080/10350330.2021.1877995
  • Mahula, S., Tan, E., and Crompvoets, J. (2021, January 9–11). With blockchain or not? Opportunities and challenges of self-sovereign identity implementation in public administration: Lessons from the Belgian case. Proceedings of the DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Naik, N., and Jenkins, P. (2020, January 3–6). Self-Sovereign Identity Specifications: Govern Your Identity Through Your Digital Wallet Using Blockchain Technology. Proceedings of the 2020 8th IEEE Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering, MobileCloud, Oxford, UK.
  • Rennie, (2022), Qual. Inq., 28, pp. 837, 10.1177/10778004221097056
  • Semenzin, (2023), Big Data Soc., 10, pp. 20539517231205479, 10.1177/20539517231205479
  • Frances, C. (2023). Stanford DAO Workshops 2022 and 2023, Arrillaga Alumni Center at Stanford University, DAO Research Collective, Megagov, Smart Contract Research Forum, and Stanford Center for Blockchain Research. Available online: https://daocollective.xyz/.
  • Viano, (2023), J. Responsible Technol., 15, pp. 100066, 10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100066
  • Werbach, K. (2019). The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust, MIT Press.
  • Zook, (2023), Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc., 16, pp. 367, 10.1093/cjres/rsad008
  • Nabben, K. (2023, November 01). A Political History of DAOs. Available online: https://www.fwb.help/wip/cypherpunks-to-social-daos.
  • Nabben, K., Puspasari, N., Kelleher, M., and Sanjay, S. (2024, February 01). Grounding Decentralised Technologies in Cooperative Principles: What can “Decentralised Autonomous Organisations” (DAOs) and Platform Cooperatives Learn from Each Other. Alternatives Data Futures: Cooperative. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3979223.
  • Naudts, E., and European Central Bank (2024, February 18). The future of DAOs in finance—In need of legal status, European Central Bank. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2866/474878.
  • Zichichi, M., Ferretti, S., and Rodríguez-Doncel, V. (2022). Decentralized personal data marketplaces: How participation in a DAO can support the production of citizen-generated data. Sensors, 22.
  • Esener, E. (2024, February 18). Adaptive Governance for Blockchain Networks. Stanf. J. Blockchain Law Policy. Available online: https://stanford-jblp.pubpub.org/pub/adaptive-governance-blockchain-networks.
  • Vulpen, (2024), Front. Blockchain, 6, pp. 1287249, 10.3389/fbloc.2023.1287249
  • Lynch, C.R., and Muñoz-Viso, A. (2023). Blockchain urbanism: Evolving geographies of libertarian exit and technopolitical failure. Prog. Hum. Geogr.
  • Montakhabi, M., Madhusudan, A., Mustafa, M.A., Vanhaverbeke, W., Almirall, E., and Van Der Graaf, S. (2023). Leveraging blockchain for energy transition in urban contexts. Big Data Soc., 10.
  • Calzada, (2023), Digital, 3, pp. 146, 10.3390/digital3030011
  • Bühler, M., Calzada, I., Cane, I., Jelinek, T., Kapoor, A., Mannan, M., Mehta, S., Mookerjee, V.S., Nübel, K., and Pentland, A. (2024, February 01). Harnessing Digital Federation Platforms and Data Cooperatives to Empower SMEs and Local Communities. TF-2: Our Common Digital Future: Affordable, Accessible, and Inclusive Digital Public Infrastructure. G20/T20 Policy Brief. Available online: https://t20ind.org/research/harnessing-digital-federation-platforms/.
  • Amin, (2023), Int. J. Sci. Soc., 5, pp. 291, 10.54783/ijsoc.v5i4.786
  • Hardjono, T., and Pentland, A. (2023). Data Cooperatives for Identity Attestations. arXiv.
  • Visvizi, A., Troisi, O., and Corvello, V. (2024). Research and Innovation Forum 2023: Navigating Shocks and Crises in Uncertain Times—Technology, Business, Society, Springer.
  • Coleman, S., and Sorensen, L. (2023). Handbook of Digital Politics, Edward Elgar.
  • Dunleavy, P., and Margetts, H. (2023). Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance. Public Policy Adm.
  • Rabe, (2023), Citizsh. Stud., 27, pp. 549, 10.1080/13621025.2023.2230153
  • Kolkman, (2022), Inf. Commun. Soc., 25, pp. 93, 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1761860
  • Sub, (2023), Democr. Theory, 10, pp. 56, 10.3167/dt.2023.100206
  • Leese, M. (2023). Staying in control of technology: Predictive policing, democracy, and digital sovereignty. Democratization.
  • Cancela, E., and Goikoetxea, J. (2024). Spanish Fake Sovereignty: From Privatising the Nation-State to becoming a Digital Colony. Ethnopolitics.
  • Spelliscy, C., Hubbard, S., Schneider, N., and Vance-Law, S. (2023). Toward Equitable Ownership and Governance in the Digital Public Sphere, Belfer Center.
  • Von Grafenstein, M. (2023). The New Hanse: Data Sharing Between Public and Private Actors in the Public Interest, The New Hanse.
  • McCourt, F.H. (2024). Our Biggest Fight: Reclaiming Liberty, Humanity, and Dignity in the Digital Age, Crown Publishing.
  • Bria, F. (2023). Governing Urban Data for the Public Interest: A Final Report, The New Hanse.
  • Burrell, (2021), Annu. Rev. Sociol., 47, pp. 213, 10.1146/annurev-soc-090820-020800
  • Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper & Brothers.
  • Burr, C., and Floridi, L. (2020). Ethics of Digital Well-Being. Philosophical Studies Series, Springer.
  • Ryan, J., and Christl, W. (2024, February 01). Europe’s Hidden Security Crisis: How Data about European Defence Personnel and Political Leaders Flows to Foreign States and Non-States Actors. Available online: https://www.iccl.ie/digital-data/europes-hidden-security-crisis/.
  • (2024, February 01). The State of Open Data 2023: The Longest-Running Longitudinal Survey and Analysis on Open Data. Available online: https://www.digital-science.com/state-of-open-data/.
  • UKRI (2023). Welcome to the Future: Innovate UK’s 50 Emerging Technologies. Technologies that Will Shape the UK Economy in 2040 and beyond, UKRI.
  • Calzada, (2023), Futures, 154, pp. 103258, 10.1016/j.futures.2023.103258
  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Beacon Press.
  • Calzada, I. (2022). Emerging Digital Citizenship Regimes: Postpandemic Technopolitical Democracies, Emerald.
  • Stucke, M.E. (2022). Breaking Away: How to Regain Control Over Our Data, Privacy, and Autonomy, Oxford University Press.
  • Srivastava, S. (2021). Algorithmic Governance and the International Politics of Big Tech, Cambridge University Press.
  • Calzada, (2021), J. Urban Aff., 43, pp. 1
  • Van Dijck, J. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World, Oxford University Press.
  • Arendt, H. (1966). The Origins of Tatalitarism, Penguin.
  • Sadowski, (2019), Big Data Soc., 6, pp. 1, 10.1177/2053951718820549
  • O’Shea, L. (2021). Future Histories: What Ada Lovelace, Tom Paine, and the Paris Commune Can Teach Us About Digital Technology, Verso.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, Profile.
  • Kenney, M. (2000). Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford University Press.
  • Thomason, J., and Ivwurie, E. (2023). Advancements in the New World of Web 3: A Look Toward the Decentralized Future, IGO Global.
  • Lécuyer, C. (2007). Making Silicon Valley: Innovation and the Growth of High Tech, 193-1970, MIT Press.
  • Saxenian, A.L. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Harvard University Press.
  • O’Mara, M. (2019). The Code: Silicon Vally and the Remaking of America, Penguin Press.
  • Calzada, I. (2023). Blockchain-Driven Digital Nomadism in the Basque e-Diaspora. Globalizations.
  • Project Liberty Institute & BlockchainGov (2024, February 01). Interim Report on Blockchain Governance Practices: Multistakeholder Initiative: Towards Best Practices for Responsible Decentralized Technical Governance Ecosystem; Project Liberty Institute & BlockchainGov: 2024. Available online: https://blockchaingov.eu/interim-report-on-blockchain-governance/.
  • Manley, J., Webster, A., and Kuznetsova, O. (2024). Co-Operation and Co-Operatives in 21st-Century Europe, Bristol University Press.
  • Lindman, J., Berryhill, J., Welby, B., and Piccinin-Barbieri, M. (2020). The Uncertain Promise of Blockchain Government, OECD.
  • Dupont, Q. (2017). Campbell-Verduyn, M. Bitcoin and Beyond, Routledge.
  • Srinivasan, B. (2024, February 01). The Network State. Available online: https://thenetworkstate.com/.
  • European Parliament (2023). Social Approach to the Transition to Smart Cities, European Parliament. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2023)737128.
  • Bucher, (2012), New Media Soc., 14, pp. 1164, 10.1177/1461444812440159
  • Forestal, (2020), Political Stud., 69, pp. 26, 10.1177/0032321719890807
  • Forestal, J. (2022). Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments, Oxford University Press.
  • Taplin, J. (2017). Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Have Cornered Culture and What It Means for All of Us, Little Brown. Available online: https://www.amazon.es/Move-Fast-Break-Things-Undermined/dp/0316275778.
  • Veliz, C. (2020). Privacy is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data, Penguin.
  • Gorwa, (2019), Inf. Commun. Soc., 22, pp. 854, 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
  • Park, H., Ureta, I., and Kim, B. (2023). Trend analysis of Decentralized Autonomous Organization Using Big Data Analytics. Information, 14.
  • Hubbard, S. (2023). Decentralized Autonomous Organizations and Policy Considerations in the United States, Belfer Center.
  • Calzada, (2021), Smart Cities, 4, pp. 1158, 10.3390/smartcities4030062
  • OECD (2023). Platform Cooperatives and Employment: An Alternative for Platform Work, OECD.
  • The New School of Platform Cooperativism Consortium/Harvard Berkman Klein (2021). Principles, Data Trusts, and the Digital Economy, The New School of Platform Cooperativism Consortium/Harvard Berkman Klein. Available online: https://cyber.harvard.edu/projects/alternative-data-futures-cooperative-principles-data-trusts-digital-economy.
  • Mathew, (2016), Internet Policy Rev., 5, pp. 1, 10.14763/2016.3.425
  • Monsees, L. (2019). Crypto-Politics: Encryption and Democratic Practices in the Digital Era, Routledge.
  • Isin, E., and Ruppert, E. (2015). Being Digital Citizens, Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Morozov, (2022), New Left Rev., 133–134, pp. 89
  • Morozov, E., and Cancela, E. (2023, November 01). Benedetta Brevini Interview. Available online: https://www.eldiario.es/tecnologia/benedetta-brevini-grandes-tecnologicas-dicen-no-emitir-carbono-inteligencia-artificial-ayudar-petroleras_128_10240272.html.
  • Toscano, J. (2023, November 01). Data Privacy Issues Are the Root of Our Big Tech Monopoly Dilemma. Forbes. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joetoscano1/2021/12/01/data-privacy-issues-are-the-root-of-our-big-tech-monopoly-dilemma/?sh=4be10acc3cfd.
  • Calzada, I. (2018). (Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona. Sustainability, 10.
  • Pasquinelli, M. (2024, January 01). Artificial Intelligence, Automation, Work, and Algorithms. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0wECTKNmlY&t=1s.
  • Jain, S., Spelliscy, C., Vance-Law, S., and Moore, S. (2024, January 01). AI and Democracy’s Digital Identity Crisis. Stanf. J. Blockchain Law Policy 2024. Available online: https://stanford-jblp.pubpub.org/pub/ai-democracy-digital-identity.
  • Thomson Reuters Foundation (2024, January 01). Toolkit A.I. Governance for Africa. Available online: www.trust.org.
  • UN-Habitat (2023). AI and Cities: Risks, Applications, and Governance, UN-Habitat.
  • Glenster, A.K., and Gilbert, S. (2023). Policy Brief: Generative AI, Minderoo Centre for Technology and Democracy. Available online: https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/publications/generative-ai/.
  • Institute on Governance (2023). Towards a Considered Use of AI Technologies in Government, Institute on Governance. Available online: https://iog.ca/publications/towards-a-considered-use-of-ai-technologies-in-government/.
  • Mahrenbach, L. (2023). Governing Artificial Intelligence, Global Policy.
  • Barlow, J.P. (2023, November 01). A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Available online: https://vimeo.com/111576518?ref=tw-v-share.
  • Villa-Nicholas, M. (2023). Data Borders: How Silicon Valley is Bulding an Industry Around Immigrants, University of California Press. Available online: https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520386075/data-borders.
  • Muñiz, A. (2022). Borderland Circuitry: Immigration Survellance in the United States and Beyond, University of California Press. Available online: https://cloudempires.org/.
  • Bjola, C., and Manor, I. (2024). The Oxford Handbook of Digital Diplomacy, Oxford University Press.
  • Echeverría, J. (1994). Telépolis, Destino.
  • Calzada, (2015), J. Urban Technol., 22, pp. 23, 10.1080/10630732.2014.971535
  • Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). Cloud Empires: How Digital Platforms Are Overtaking the State and HowWe Can Regain Control, MIT Press.
  • Singh, (2019), South Asia J. Asian Stud., 42, pp. 501, 10.1080/00856401.2019.1602810
  • Calzada, I. (2021). The Right to Have Digital Rights in Smart Cities. Sustainability, 13.
  • (2016), Int. J. Commun., 10, pp. 1721
  • De Filippi, P., and Schingler, J.K. (2023, November 01). Coordi-Nations: A New Institutional Structure for Global Cooperation. Available online: https://jessykate.medium.com/coordi-nations-a-new-institutional-structure-for-global-cooperation-3ef38d6e2cfa.
  • Marquardt, F. (2021). The New Nomads: How the Migration Revolution is Making the World a Better Place, Simon & Schuster. Available online: https://www.amazon.com/The-New-Nomad/dp/1471177378.
  • Fourcade, M., and Gordon, J. (2020). Learning Like a State: Statecraft in the Digital Age. J. Law Political Econ., 78.
  • Calzada, (2018), Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci., 5, pp. 267
  • Couldry, N., and Mejias, U. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating it for Capitalism, Stanford University Press.
  • Lohr, S. (2015). Data-ism: The Revolution Transforming Decision Making, Consumer Behavior, and Almost Everything Else, OneWorld. Available online: https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=28816.
  • Scharenger, A., and Basassi, V. (2022, January 2–5). Algorithmic Resistance in Europe and the Question of Collective Agency. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Dublin, CA, USA.
  • (2024, January 01). AI4GOV. Available online: https://ai4gov-project.eu/2023/11/14/ai4gov-d3-1/.
  • (2024, January 01). KT4Democracy. Available online: https://kt4democracy.eu/.
  • Singh, A. (2019). Advances in Smart Cities: Smarter People, Governance, and Solutions. J. Urban Technol., 1–4.
  • Singh, R. (2023). The curious case of tweeting an Aadhaar number: Trust/mistrust in security practices of public data infrastructures. J. Cult. Econ.
  • European Commission (2020). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on Contestable and Fair Markets in the Digital Sector (Digital Market Act), European Commission. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A842%3AFIN.
  • Digita, E., Minghini, M., Kotsev, A., Soler-Garrido, J., Tapsall, B., Micheli, M., Posada, M., Signorelli, S., Tartaro, A., and Bernal, J. (2023). European Data Spaces: Scientific Insights into Data Sharing and Utilisation at Scale, Publications Office of the European Union.
  • OECD (2023). Initial Policy Considerations for Generative Artificial Intelligence, OECD.
  • Forrester (2023). Predictions 2024, Forrester.
  • Spanish Government (2023). The Digital Infrastructures and Connectivity Plan for Society, Economy, and the Territories, Spanish Government.
  • Senadheera, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Desouza, K.C., Mossberger, K., Corchado, J., Mehmood, R., and Li, R.Y.M. (2024). Understanding Chatbot Adoption in Local Governments: A Review and Framework. J. Urban Technol.
  • Sgueo, G. (2023). The Design of Digital Democracy, Springer.
  • Khan, (2022), Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 28, pp. 442, 10.3846/tede.2022.16028
  • Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the Global Network Revolution, Weidenfeld & Nicholson. Available online: https://www.amazon.es/Connectography-Mapping-Global-Network-Revolution/dp/1474604242.
  • Lambach, D., and Monsees, L. (2024, January 01). Beyond Sovereignty as Authority: The Multiplicity of European Approaches to Digital Sovereignty. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368837486_Beyond_Sovereignty_as_Authority_The_Multiplicity_of_European_Approaches_to_Digital_Sovereignty.
  • Pizzul, D., and Veneziano, M. (2023). Digital sovereignty or sovereignism? Investigating the political discourse on digital contact tracing apps in France. Inf. Commun. Soc.
  • Calzada, I. (2014). How Do Small Nations Cooperate? An Action Research Framework Wales and the Basque Country. Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci.
  • (2023), Technol. Soc., 74, pp. 102327, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102327
  • WEF (2023). Data for the City of Tomorrow: Developing the Capabilities and Capacity to Guide Better Urban Futures, WEF.
  • Helberger, N., and Diakopoulos, N. (2023). ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Rev., 12.
  • Kim, (2018), Political Commun., 35, pp. 515, 10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425
  • Tangi, (2023), Gov. Inf. Q., 40, pp. 101860, 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101860
  • Mejias, U.A., and Couldry, N. (2024). Data Grab: The New Colonialism of Big Tech (and How to Fight Back), WH Allen.
  • Bignami, (2022), Citizsh. Stud., 27, pp. 145, 10.1080/13621025.2022.2147262
  • McElroy, E. (2024). Silicon Valley Imperialism: Techno Fantasies & Frictions in Postsocialist Times, Duke University Press.
  • Jarrett, K., Kitchin, R., Pink, S., Hiah, J., and Steele, C.K. Dialogues on Digital Society. Dialogues Digit. Soc., 2024.
  • Lorinc, J. (2022). Dream States: Smart Cities, Technology, and the Pursuit of Urban Utopias, Coach House Books.
  • Crozier, M. (2009). The Bureaucratic Phenomenon, Routledge.
  • Waldo, D. (2006). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration, Routledge.
  • Bauwens, M., Kostakis, V., and Pazaitis, A. (2019). Peer to Peer: The Commons Manifesto, University of Westminster Press.
  • Bokolo, (2021), Enterp. Inf. Syst., 17, pp. 1989494
  • Cazzaniga, M., Jaumotte, F., Li, L., Melina, G., Panton, A.J., Pizzinelli, C., Rockall, E., Tavares, M.M., and IMF (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work, IMF. Available online: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2024/01/14/Gen-AI-Artificial-Intelligence-and-the-Future-of-Work-542379.
  • Novelli, C., Casolari, F., Hacker, P., Spedicato, G., and Floridi, L. (2024, February 14). Generative AI in EU Law: Liability, Privacy, Intellectual Property, and Cybersecurity. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4694565.
  • Innerarity, D. (2023). The epistemic impossibility of an artificial intelligence take-over of democracy. AI Soc.
  • BAIC (Basque Artificial Intelligence Center) (2024). Guía para aplicar Inteligencia Artificial en la Industria, BAIC.
  • WEF (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. Insight Report, WEF.
  • WEF (2023). Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) Toolkit, WEF.
  • Aguerre, C., Campbell-Verduyn, M., and Scholte, J.A. (2024). Global Digital Data Governance: Polycentric Perspectives, Routledge.
  • Bonifazi, G., Cauteruccio, F., Corradini, E., Marchetti, M., Ursino, D., and Virgili, L. (2023). Applying Social Network Analysis to Model and Handle a Cross-Blockchain Ecosystem. Electronics, 12.
  • Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the Future: The Ascendancy of a Political Technology, Zone Books.
  • WIRED (2024, February 05). Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/a-dangerous-new-home-for-online-extremism.
  • Calzada, I. (2024). Datafied Democracies Unplugged, Springer.
  • Fourcade, M., and Healy, K. (2024). The Ordinal Society, Harvard University Press.