El deber de motivar un laudo arbitral no se integra en el orden público exigido en el art. 24 de la Constitución, sino que surge de lo que las partes negociaron que fuera resuelto en el arbitraje

  1. Antonio María Lorca Navarrete 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Journal:
La Ley. Mediación y arbitraje

ISSN: 2660-7808

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 15

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: La Ley. Mediación y arbitraje

Abstract

The non‐existence of a novum iudicium on the award made by the arbitrator does not affect public policy. Or, in other words, it is not a matter of public policy. Or, in other words, the absence of a novum iudicium on the award rendered by the arbitrator does not give rise to public disorder in arbitration. Nor does the reasoning of the arbitral award affect public policy. Or, in other words, the reasoning of the arbitral award is not a matter related to public order and, therefore, may give rise to public disorder. It is not a matter of public policy.

Data source: Dialnet