Assessment of Adaptive Performance and its Role as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

  1. Arantxa Gorostiaga 1
  2. Nekane Balluerka 1
  3. Alexander Rodríguez-López 2
  1. 1 University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
  2. 2 Provincial Council of Alava
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 34

Número: 1

Páginas: 84-94

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2021.310 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Psicothema

Resumen

Antecedentes: el desempeño adaptativo es una variable crucial en las organizaciones actuales dado que la flexibilidad y la capacidad de adaptación son necesarias en un entorno laboral tan dinámico y cambiante como el actual. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron adaptar al castellano el instrumento de Charbonnier-Voirin y Roussel (2012), que mide el desempeño adaptativo y examinar si las dimensiones que configuran el desempeño adaptativo moderan la relación entre el ajuste persona-organización (PO fit) y las conductas de ciudadanía organizacional (OCBs). Se pronosticó que la relación entre PO fit y OCBs sería más intensa en aquellas personas con mayor desempeño adaptativo. Método: la muestra estuvo compuesta por 678 empleados/as (65% mujeres) del sector público del País Vasco, con edades comprendidas entre 21 y 63 años (M = 44.63; SD = 7.66). Resultados: los resultados muestran que la versión española de la escala posee buenas propiedades psicométricas. Además, la dimensión Adaptabilidad Interpersonal del desempeño adaptativo modera la relación entre el PO fit y las OCBs. En la predicción de las OCBs dirigidas a otros individuos, la Reactividad ante emergencias también modera la relación. Conclusiones: se discuten las implicaciones prácticas que pueden tener en el ámbito de la selección de personal los resultados derivados del estudio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210
  • Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC. https://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED458219
  • Barrick, M. R., & Parks-Leduc, L. (2019). Selection for fit. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 171- 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015028
  • Cáceres, G. A. (2014). Interacción de las variables nivel jerárquico en la organización y percepción de distancia al poder sobre el ajuste persona-organización. Análisis del personal administrativo y docente de la PUCE [Interaction effect of organizational hierarchy variables and perceived power distance on person-organization fit: Analysis of administrative and teaching staff of the PUCE] [Bachelor thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador]. Repositorio Digital PUCE. http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/22000/9749
  • Carpenter, N. C., Berry, C. M., & Houston, L. (2014). A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 547- 574. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518332013-140
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I. S., Wang, J., & Stoverink, A. C. (2017). A bigger piece of the pie: The relative importance of affiliative and changeoriented citizenship and task performance in predicting overall job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.006
  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
  • Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y
  • Dávila, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior from the functional analysis and role identity perspectives: Further evidence in Spanish employees. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1138741600003851
  • De Cooman, R., Mol, S. T., Billsberry, J., Boon, C., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2019). Epilogue: Frontiers in person-environment fit research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(5), 646- 652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1630480
  • Demerouti, E., Xanthopoulou, D., Tsaousis, I., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Disentangling task and contextual performance: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000104
  • Echchakoui, S. (2013). Personality traits and performance: The mediating role of adaptive behavior in call centers. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(01), 17-27. http://doi.org/10.4236/ ajibm.2013.31003
  • Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654-677. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0014891
  • Farzaneh, J., Farashah, A. D., & Kazemi, M. (2014). The impact of person-job fit and person-organization fit on OCB: The mediating and moderating effects of organizational commitment and psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(5), 672-691. https://doi. org/10.1108/PR-07-2013-0118
  • Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Seven decades of factor analysis: From Yela to the present day. Psicothema, 33(3), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2021.24
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30. https:// www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/48345
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based analysis. Guilford Press.
  • Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389-399. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1999, June 22). How large can a standardized coefficient be? http://www.statmodel.com/download/Joreskog.pdf
  • Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318226a763
  • Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2016). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00119_2.x
  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.87.1.131
  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevclinpsy-032813-153700
  • Muduli, A. (2017). Workforce agility: Examining the role of organizational practices and psychological empowerment. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(5), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ joe.21800
  • Murphy, S. L. (2015). Individual adaptability as a predictor of job performance [Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University]. Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/ dissertations/209
  • Obiora, J. N., & Okpu, T. (2015). Creativity and organizational citizenship behaviour in the Nigerian hospitality industry. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 3(3), 9-20.
  • Organ, D. W. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior: Recent trends and developments. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 80, 295-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-orgpsych-032117-104536
  • Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of the S- χ2. An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004
  • Ostroff, C., & Zhan, Y. (2012). Person–environment fit in the selection process. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 252-273). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199732579.013.0012
  • Piasentin, K. A. (2007). How do employees conceptualize fit? Development of a multidimensional measure of subjective Person-Organization fit (Order No. NR25707) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304899363)
  • Pini, A., & Mariani, M. G. (2014). Performance adattiva nei contesti organizzativi: verso un modello di analisi integrato [Adaptive performance in organizational contexts: Towards an integrated analysis model]. Psicologia sociale, 1, 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1482/76367
  • Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 3-39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s1479-3601(05)06001-7
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518442013-522
  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
  • Quick, J. C., Nelson, D. L., Quick, J. D., & Orman, D. K. (2001). An isomorphic theory of stress: The dynamics of person–environment fit. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 17(3), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smi.893
  • Ramírez, R. G. (2013). Diseño del trabajo y desempeño laboral individual [Job design and individual work performance]. [Doctoral thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid]. Biblos e-Archivo. http://hdl. handle.net/10486/13039
  • Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 693-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115134
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society. http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf
  • Schmidt, F. L. Oh, I. -S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Fox School of Business Research Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309203898_ The_Validity_and_Utility_of_Selection_Methods_in_Personnel_ Psychology_Practical_and_Theoretical_Implications_of_100_Years_ of_Research_Findings
  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428109351241
  • Toland, M. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120-151. https://doi. org/10.1177/0272431613511332
  • Tucker, J. S., Pleban, R. J., & Gunther, K. M. (2010). The mediating effects of adaptive skill on values-performance relationships. Human Performance, 23, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280 903400275
  • Vigil-Colet, A., Navarro González, D., & Morales Vives, F. (2020). To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question. Psicothema, 32(1), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2019.286
  • Walker, J. C. (2015). Adaptability in the workplace: An exploratory study on adaptive performance in the workplace using a scenario-based tool (Order No. 3723123) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1728882484).
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617. https://doi. org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet