Assessment of Adaptive Performance and its Role as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Person-Organization Fit and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors

  1. Arantxa Gorostiaga 1
  2. Nekane Balluerka 1
  3. Alexander Rodríguez-López 2
  1. 1 University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU
  2. 2 Provincial Council of Alava
Aldizkaria:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915,  1886-144X

Argitalpen urtea: 2022

Alea: 34

Zenbakia: 1

Orrialdeak: 84-94

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.7334/PSICOTHEMA2021.310 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Psicothema

Laburpena

Background: Adaptive performance is of central interest for today’s organizations, insofar as employees increasingly need to be able to adjust their behaviors to dynamic, changing work situations. The aims of this study were to develop a Spanish adaptation of Charbonnier-Voirin and Roussel’s (2012) scale for measuring adaptive performance, and to examine whether the dimensions of adaptive performance moderate the relationship between person-organization fit (PO fit) and organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs). We hypothesized that the relationship between PO fit and OCBs would be stronger in individuals with a higher level of adaptive performance. Method: The sample comprised 678 employees (65% women) in the public sector in the Basque Country. They ranged from 21 to 63 years old (M = 44.63; SD = 7.66). Results: The Spanish version of the scale has good psychometric properties. Furthermore, the Interpersonal Adaptability dimension of adaptive performance moderates the relationship between PO fit and OCBs directed both at the organization and at individuals, following the expected direction. The relationship between PO fit and OCBs directed at individuals was also moderated by the Reactivity in the Face of Emergencies dimension. Conclusions: We discuss the practical implications of these results in the field of personnel selection.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210
  • Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC. https://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED458219
  • Barrick, M. R., & Parks-Leduc, L. (2019). Selection for fit. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 171- 193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015028
  • Cáceres, G. A. (2014). Interacción de las variables nivel jerárquico en la organización y percepción de distancia al poder sobre el ajuste persona-organización. Análisis del personal administrativo y docente de la PUCE [Interaction effect of organizational hierarchy variables and perceived power distance on person-organization fit: Analysis of administrative and teaching staff of the PUCE] [Bachelor thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador]. Repositorio Digital PUCE. http://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/22000/9749
  • Carpenter, N. C., Berry, C. M., & Houston, L. (2014). A meta-analytic comparison of self-reported and other-reported organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(4), 547- 574. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518332013-140
  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29(3), 280-293. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232
  • Chiaburu, D. S., Oh, I. S., Wang, J., & Stoverink, A. C. (2017). A bigger piece of the pie: The relative importance of affiliative and changeoriented citizenship and task performance in predicting overall job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.006
  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
  • Cullen, K. L., Edwards, B. D., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. R. (2014). Employees’ adaptability and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9312-y
  • Dávila, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (2010). Predicting organizational citizenship behavior from the functional analysis and role identity perspectives: Further evidence in Spanish employees. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 277-283. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s1138741600003851
  • De Cooman, R., Mol, S. T., Billsberry, J., Boon, C., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2019). Epilogue: Frontiers in person-environment fit research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(5), 646- 652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1630480
  • Demerouti, E., Xanthopoulou, D., Tsaousis, I., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Disentangling task and contextual performance: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000104
  • Echchakoui, S. (2013). Personality traits and performance: The mediating role of adaptive behavior in call centers. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 3(01), 17-27. http://doi.org/10.4236/ ajibm.2013.31003
  • Edwards, J. R., & Cable, D. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 654-677. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0014891
  • Farzaneh, J., Farashah, A. D., & Kazemi, M. (2014). The impact of person-job fit and person-organization fit on OCB: The mediating and moderating effects of organizational commitment and psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 43(5), 672-691. https://doi. org/10.1108/PR-07-2013-0118
  • Ferrando, P. J. (2021). Seven decades of factor analysis: From Yela to the present day. Psicothema, 33(3), 378-385. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2021.24
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30. https:// www.jattjournal.com/index.php/atp/article/view/48345
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based analysis. Guilford Press.
  • Hoffman, B. J., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A quantitative review of the relationship between person–organization fit and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 389-399. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.08.003
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi. org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1999, June 22). How large can a standardized coefficient be? http://www.statmodel.com/download/Joreskog.pdf
  • Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e318226a763
  • Landy, F. J., & Conte, J. M. (2016). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to industrial and organizational psychology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00119_2.x
  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.87.1.131
  • Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurevclinpsy-032813-153700
  • Muduli, A. (2017). Workforce agility: Examining the role of organizational practices and psychological empowerment. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(5), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ joe.21800
  • Murphy, S. L. (2015). Individual adaptability as a predictor of job performance [Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University]. Louisiana Tech Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.latech.edu/ dissertations/209
  • Obiora, J. N., & Okpu, T. (2015). Creativity and organizational citizenship behaviour in the Nigerian hospitality industry. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 3(3), 9-20.
  • Organ, D. W. (2018). Organizational citizenship behavior: Recent trends and developments. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 80, 295-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-orgpsych-032117-104536
  • Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of the S- χ2. An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004
  • Ostroff, C., & Zhan, Y. (2012). Person–environment fit in the selection process. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 252-273). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199732579.013.0012
  • Piasentin, K. A. (2007). How do employees conceptualize fit? Development of a multidimensional measure of subjective Person-Organization fit (Order No. NR25707) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Calgary]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304899363)
  • Pini, A., & Mariani, M. G. (2014). Performance adattiva nei contesti organizzativi: verso un modello di analisi integrato [Adaptive performance in organizational contexts: Towards an integrated analysis model]. Psicologia sociale, 1, 29-47. https://doi.org/10.1482/76367
  • Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual adaptability (I-ADAPT) theory: Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of individual differences in adaptability. In Understanding adaptability: A prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments (pp. 3-39). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https:// doi.org/10.1016/s1479-3601(05)06001-7
  • Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/e518442013-522
  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 612-624. https://doi. org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612
  • Quick, J. C., Nelson, D. L., Quick, J. D., & Orman, D. K. (2001). An isomorphic theory of stress: The dynamics of person–environment fit. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 17(3), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ smi.893
  • Ramírez, R. G. (2013). Diseño del trabajo y desempeño laboral individual [Job design and individual work performance]. [Doctoral thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid]. Biblos e-Archivo. http://hdl. handle.net/10486/13039
  • Ryan, A. M., & Ployhart, R. E. (2014). A century of selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 693-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurevpsych-010213-115134
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Psychometric Society. http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf
  • Schmidt, F. L. Oh, I. -S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Fox School of Business Research Paper. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309203898_ The_Validity_and_Utility_of_Selection_Methods_in_Personnel_ Psychology_Practical_and_Theoretical_Implications_of_100_Years_ of_Research_Findings
  • Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476. https://doi. org/10.1177/1094428109351241
  • Toland, M. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120-151. https://doi. org/10.1177/0272431613511332
  • Tucker, J. S., Pleban, R. J., & Gunther, K. M. (2010). The mediating effects of adaptive skill on values-performance relationships. Human Performance, 23, 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280 903400275
  • Vigil-Colet, A., Navarro González, D., & Morales Vives, F. (2020). To reverse or to not reverse Likert-type items: That is the question. Psicothema, 32(1), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.7334/ psicothema2019.286
  • Walker, J. C. (2015). Adaptability in the workplace: An exploratory study on adaptive performance in the workplace using a scenario-based tool (Order No. 3723123) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1728882484).
  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617. https://doi. org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Datuen iturria: Dialnet