L1 transfer in article selection for generic reference by Spanish, Turkish and Japanese L2 learners

Referencias bibliográficas

• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
• Bickerton, D. (1981). Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma Press.
• Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
• Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405.
• Dahl, Ö. (1975). On generics. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language. (pp. 99– 111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dasinger, L., & Küntay, A. (1998). Introducing referents in elicited discourse: Finnish vs. Turkish. In A. Aksu-Koc, E. Erguvanli-Taylan, A. Sumru Ozsoy & A. Küntay (Eds.), Perspectives in language acquisition: Selected papers from the International Congress for the Study of Child Language (pp. 14–19, 1996).
• Fukui, N. (1995). Theory of projection in syntax. Tokyo: CSLI publications. Kurosio publishers.
• García-Mayo, M. P. (2009). Article choice in L2 English by Spanish speakers: Evidence for full transfer. In M. P. García-Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. (pp. 13–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1992). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Goad, H. & White, L. (2009). Prosodic transfer and the representation of determiners in TurkishEnglish interlanguage. In Representational deficits in SLA: Studies in honor of Roger Hawkins. In N. Snape, Y-k I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (Eds.), 1-26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Göksel, A. & Kerslake. C. (2005). Turkish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
• T. Ionin & Montrul, S. (2009). Article use and generic reference: parallels between L1- and L2- acquisition. In M. P. García Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. (pp. 147–174). John Benjamins.
• Ionin T. & Montrul, S. (2010). The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning, 60, 877–925.
• Ionin T. and Montrul, S., J.-H. Kim, and Philippov, V. (2009). Singular generics in L2-English. Talk presented at the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA, November 6–8.
• Ionin, T., Montrul, S. & Santos, H. (2011). An experimental investigation of the expression of genericity in English, Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua, 121, 963–985.
• Jarvis, S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: Identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50, 245–309.
• Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
• Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Link, G. & Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: an introduction. In G. Carlson & F. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp.1–125). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Kuroda, S. Y. (1992). Japanese syntax and semantics: Collected papers. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
• Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25, 173–227.
• Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–65.
• Longobardi, G. (2001). The structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters and problems. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, (pp. 562–604). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
• Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Master, P. (1987). Generic the in the Scientific American, ESP Journal, 6(3), 165–86.
• Moravcsik, E. A. (1969). Determination. Working Papers on Language Universals, 1, 63–98.
• Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Odlin, T. and Jarvis, S. (2004). Same source, different outcomes: A study of Swedish influence on the acquisition of English in Finland. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(2), 123-140.
• Schwartz, B. D. (1999). Transfer and L2 acquisition of syntax: Where are we now? In K. Oga & G. Poole (Eds.), Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics (pp. 211-234). Newcastle upon Type: University of Newcastle.
• Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72.
• Slabakova, R. (2006). A semantic parameter with a syntactic trigger in the L2 acquisition of Italian. In R. Slabakova, S. Montrul, and P. Prévost (eds.), Inquiries in linguistic development: Studies in honor of Lydia White (pp. 69–87). John Benjamins: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
• Slabakova, R. (2009). Features or parameters: which one makes second language acquisition easier, and more interesting to study? Second Language Research, 25(2): 313–324.
• Snape, N. (2008). The acquisition of the English determiner phrase by L2 learners: Japanese and Spanish. Saarbrücken, Germany: VDM Verlag.
• Syndicate, U. C. L. E. (2001). Quick Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wexler, K. & Manzini, R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In T. Roeper, and E. Williams (eds.), Parameter Setting (pp. 41–76). Dordrecht: Reidel.
• White, L. (1992). On triggering data in L2 acquisition: a reply to Schwartz and Gubala-Ryzak. Second Language Research, 8, 120–137.
• White, L. (2003). Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Implications of persistent problems with inflectional morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 6: 129–141.
• Whitman, R. L. (1974). Teaching the article in English, TESOL Quarterly, 8(3), 253–262.