Publicaciones en colaboración con investigadoras/es de Georgetown University (24)

2024

  1. Palaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene are distinct from those of previous epochs

    Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 255

  2. The Anthropocene within the Geological Time Scale: a response to fundamental questions

    Episodes, Vol. 47, Núm. 1, pp. 65-83

  3. The future extent of the Anthropocene epoch: A synthesis

    Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 242

2023

  1. Response to Merritts et al. (2023): The Anthropocene is complex. Defining it is not

    Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 238

  2. The Anthropocene is a prospective epoch/series, not a geological event

    Episodes, Vol. 46, Núm. 2, pp. 229-238

2022

  1. Epochs, events and episodes: Marking the geological impact of humans

    Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 234

  2. The proposed Anthropocene Epoch/Series is underpinned by an extensive array of mid-20th century stratigraphic event signals

    Journal of Quaternary Science, Vol. 37, Núm. 7, pp. 1181-1187

2021

  1. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1

    Autophagy, Vol. 17, Núm. 1, pp. 1-382

2020

  1. Author Correction: Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed Anthropocene Epoch (Communications Earth & Environment, (2020), 1, 1, (32), 10.1038/s43247-020-00029-y)

    Communications Earth and Environment

  2. Extraordinary human energy consumption and resultant geological impacts beginning around 1950 CE initiated the proposed Anthropocene Epoch

    Communications Earth and Environment, Vol. 1, Núm. 1

  3. UNDERGROUND METRO SYSTEMS A durable geological proxy of rapid urban population growth and energy consumption during the Anthropocene

    ROUTLEDGE COMPANION TO BIG HISTORY (ROUTLEDGE), pp. 434-455

2019

  1. A formal Anthropocene is compatible with but distinct from its diachronous anthropogenic counterparts: a response to W.F. Ruddiman’s ‘three flaws in defining a formal Anthropocene’

    Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 43, Núm. 3, pp. 319-333

2018

  1. Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Anthropocene Series: Where and how to look for potential candidates

    Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 178, pp. 379-429

2017

  1. Making the case for a formal Anthropocene Epoch: An analysis of ongoing critiques

    Newsletters on Stratigraphy, Vol. 50, Núm. 2, pp. 205-226

  2. Scale and diversity of the physical technosphere: A geological perspective

    Anthropocene Review, Vol. 4, Núm. 1, pp. 9-22

  3. The Working Group on the Anthropocene: Summary of evidence and interim recommendations

    Anthropocene, Vol. 19, pp. 55-60

2016

  1. Stratigraphic and Earth System approaches to defining the Anthropocene

    Earth's Future, Vol. 4, Núm. 8, pp. 324-345

  2. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene

    Science, Vol. 351, Núm. 6269

  3. The Anthropocene: A conspicuous stratigraphical signal of anthropogenic changes in production and consumption across the biosphere

    Earth's Future, Vol. 4, Núm. 3, pp. 34-53

  4. The geological cycle of plastics and their use as a stratigraphic indicator of the Anthropocene

    Anthropocene, Vol. 13, pp. 4-17