Publicaciones en las que colabora con Carmen Osuna Sierra (11)

2020

  1. Patient opinion of analgesia during external cephalic version at term in singleton pregnancy

    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 40, Núm. 6, pp. 767-771

2017

  1. Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: A retrospective cohort study

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Vol. 45, Núm. 3, pp. 299-303

2016

  1. Increased pain relief with remifentanil does not improve the success rate of external cephalic version: A randomized controlled trial

    Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 95, Núm. 5, pp. 547-554

2015

  1. Management of breech presentation at term: A retrospective cohort study of 10 years of experience

    Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 35, Núm. 10, pp. 803-808

2014

  1. Effect of maternal intravenous fluid therapy on external cephalic version at term: A prospective cohort study

    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 211, Núm. 6, pp. 665.e1-665.e7

  2. Is external cephalic version at term contraindicated in previous caesarean section? A prospective comparative cohort study

    BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 121, Núm. 2, pp. 230-235

2013

  1. Nitrous oxide for analgesia in external cephalic version at term: Prospective comparative study

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Vol. 41, Núm. 6, pp. 719-723

2012

  1. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections

    Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 25, Núm. 9, pp. 1716-1718

2011

  1. External cephalic version: A review of the evidence

    Current Women's Health Reviews, Vol. 7, Núm. 4, pp. 405-415

  2. Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean delivery: A retrospective comparative study

    Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

  3. Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: A retrospective comparative study

    Journal of Perinatal Medicine, Vol. 39, Núm. 4, pp. 397-402