Publicaciones en colaboración con investigadoras/es de Université de Caen Basse-Normandie (6)

2019

  1. A formal Anthropocene is compatible with but distinct from its diachronous anthropogenic counterparts: a response to W.F. Ruddiman’s ‘three flaws in defining a formal Anthropocene’

    Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 43, Núm. 3, pp. 319-333

2018

  1. Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) for the Anthropocene Series: Where and how to look for potential candidates

    Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 178, pp. 379-429

2017

  1. Making the case for a formal Anthropocene Epoch: An analysis of ongoing critiques

    Newsletters on Stratigraphy, Vol. 50, Núm. 2, pp. 205-226

2016

  1. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene

    Science, Vol. 351, Núm. 6269

2015

  1. Colonization of the Americas, ‘little ice age’ climate, and bombproduced carbon: Their role in defining the anthropocene

    Anthropocene Review, Vol. 2, Núm. 2, pp. 117-127

  2. When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal

    Quaternary International, Vol. 383, pp. 196-203