Profiles of social networking site use and problematic use among adolescents

  1. Miriam Nerea Varona 1
  2. Alexander Muela 1
  3. Juan Manuel Machimbarrena 1
  1. 1 University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Revista:
Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

ISSN: 0210-3702,  1578-4126

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 47

Número: 3

Páginas: 626-659

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, Infancia y Aprendizaje

Resumen

Adolescents’ use of social networks has increased exponentially. Therefore, considerable interest in studying the motives for using social network sites (SNS) and the relationships between these motives and problematic SNS use (PSNU) in adolescents has arisen. This study aimed to examine the relationships between adolescents’ motives for SNS use, frequency of use, numbers of SNS used and PSNU. A total of 1,775 students (50.4% female) aged 11–19 (mean age = 14.11) completed the Scale of Motives for Using Social Networking Sites and the Problematic Social Networking Site Use Scale. The results show that the primary motives for SNS use were entertainment, information-seeking and academic purposes. Significant correlations were found between motives for use and PSNU dimensions except for preference for interaction through SNS and academic purposes. Four user profiles were established based on the motivations for use: discreet users, leisure users, socializing users and hyperconnected users. Those in this last profile scored significantly higher on PSNU, and therefore, identifying adolescents fitting this profile is going to be key to taking appropriate preventive actions.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alarcón-del-Amo M.-C., Lorenzo-Romero C., Gómez-Borja M.-Á. (2011). Classifying and profiling social networking site users: A latent segmentation approach. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 547–553.
  • Ali S., Qamar A., Habes M., Al Adwan M. (2021). Gender discrepancies concerningsocial media usage and its influenceson students academic performance. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26(1), 321–333.
  • Andrade B., Guadix I., Rial A., Suárez F. (2021). Impacto de la tecnología en la adolescencia. Relaciones, riesgos y oportunidades. UNICEF España. https://www.unicef.es/publicacion/impacto-de-la-tecnologia-en-la-adolescencia
  • Arab E., Díaz A. (2015). Impacto de las redes sociales e internet en la adolescencia: Aspectos positivos y negativos [Impact of Social Networks on adolescence: Positive and negative aspects]. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 26(1), 7–13.
  • Boer M., Stevens G. W. J. M., Finkenauer C., de Looze M. E., van den Eijnden R. J. J. M. (2021). Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106645.
  • Bonetti L., Campbell M. A., Gilmore L. (2010). The relationship of loneliness and social anxietywith children’s and adolescents’ online communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.108/cyber.2009.0215 .
  • Bozzola E., Spina G., Agostiniani R., Barni S., Russo R., Scarpato E., Di Mauro A., Di Stefano A. V., Caruso C., Corsello G., Staiano A. (2022). The use of social media in children and adolescents: Scoping review on the potential risks. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 9960.
  • Brandtzaeg P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications - A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467–488.
  • Bruggeman H., Van Hiel A., Van Hal G., Van Dongen S. (2019). Does the use of digital media affect psychological well-being? An empirical test among children aged 9 to 12. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 104–113.
  • Bulut Z. A., Doğan O. (2017). The ABCD typology: Profile and motivations of Turkish social network sites users. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 73–83.
  • Caplan S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A twostep approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1089–1097.
  • Carr C. T., Hayes R. A. (2015). Social media: Defining, developing, and divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65.
  • Chen G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762.
  • Chen H. T., Kim Y. (2013). Problematic use of social network sites: The interactive relationship between gratifications sought and privacy concerns. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 806–812.
  • Chung T. L., Anaza N. A., Park J., Hall-Phillips A. (2016). Who’s behind the screen? Segmenting social venture consumers through social media usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 288–295.
  • Collins L. M., Lanza S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Wiley.
  • Costa R. M., Patrão I., Machado M. (2019). Problematic internet use and feelings of loneliness. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 23(2), 160–162.
  • D’Agostino A., Covanti S., Rossi Monti M., Starcevic V. (2017). Reconsidering emotion dysregulation. Psychiatric Quarterly, 88(4), 807–825.
  • Dhir A., Pallesen S., Torsheim T., Andreassen C. S. (2016). Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours? Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 549–555.
  • Dhir A., Torsheim T. (2016). Age and gender differences in photo tagging gratifications. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 630–638.
  • Fioravanti G., Prostamo A., Casale S. (2020). Taking a short break from Instagram: The effects on subjective well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(2), 107–112.
  • Floros G., Siomos K. (2013). The relationship between optimal parenting, Internet addiction and motives for social networking in adolescence. Psychiatry Research, 209(3), 529–534.
  • Gámez-Guadix M., Orue I., Calvete E. (2013). Evaluation of the cognitive-behavioral model of generalized and problematic Internet use in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 25(3), 299–306.
  • García-Ruiz R., Tirado Morueta R., Hernando Gómez A. (2018). Redes sociales y estudiantes: Motivos de uso y gratificaciones. Evidencias para el aprendizaje [Social networks and students: Motives of use and gratifications: Evidences on learning]. Aula Abierta, 47(3), 291.
  • Gray L. (2018). Exploring how and why young people use social networking sites. Educational Psychology in Practice, 34(2), 175–194.
  • Griffiths M. D. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197.
  • Griffiths M. D. (2013). Social networking addiction: Emerging themes and issues. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 4(5), 1000e118.
  • Griffiths M. D. (2017). Behavioural addiction and substance addiction should be defined by their similarities not their dissimilarities: Commentaries. Addiction, 112(10), 1718–1720.
  • Hormes J. M., Kearns B., Timko C. A. (2014). Craving Facebook? Behavioral addiction to online social networking and its association with emotion regulation deficits: Online social networking addiction. Addiction, 109(12), 2079–2088.
  • Hunt D., Atkin D., Krishnan A. (2012). The influence of computer-mediated communication apprehension on motives for Facebook use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(2), 187–202.
  • IAB Spain. (2023). Estudio de redes sociales 2023 [Study on social networks 2023]. https://iabspain.es/estudio/estudio-de-redes-sociales-2023/
  • Katz E., Gurevitch M., Haas H. (1973). On the uses of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164–181. . Web of Science.
  • Kilian T., Hennigs N., Langner S. (2012). Do Millennials read books or blogs? Introducing a media usage typology of the internet generation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 114–124.
  • Kim J., LaRose R., Peng W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 451–455.
  • Kircaburun K., Alhabash S., Tosuntaş Ş. B., Griffiths M. D. (2020). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the Big Five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(3), 525–547.
  • Klobas J. E., McGill T. J., Moghavvemi S., Paramanathan T. (2018). Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 129–139.
  • Krishnan A., Hunt D. S. (2015). Influence of a multidimensional measure of attitudes on motives to use social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(3), 165–172.
  • Lee E., Lee J.-A., Moon J. H., Sung Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words: Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 552–556.
  • López-de-Ayala-López M.-C., Catalina-García B., Pastor-Ruiz Y. (2022). Problematic internet use: The preference for online social interaction and the motives for using the Internet as a mediating factor. Communication & Society, 35(2), 1–17.
  • Machimbarrena J. M., Varona M., Muela A., González-cabrera J. M. (2023). Profiles of problematic social networking site use: A cross-cultural validation of a scale with Spanish and Mexican adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 17(3), Article 5.
  • Mann R. B., Blumberg F. (2022). Adolescents and social media: The effects of frequency of use, self-presentation, social comparison, and self esteem on possible self imagery. Acta Psychologica, 228, 103629.
  • Marino C. (2018). Quality of social-media use may matter more than frequency of use for adolescents’ depression. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(4), 455–455.
  • Marino C., Gini G., Vieno A., Spada M. M. (2018). A comprehensive meta-analysis on problematic Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 262–277.
  • Marttila E., Koivula A., Räsänen P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101556. . Web of Science.
  • Mull I. R., Lee S.-E. (2014). ‘PIN’ pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 192–200.
  • Muscanell N. L., Guadagno R. E. (2012). Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 107–112.
  • Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O. (2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Authors.
  • Nylund K. L., Asparouhov T., Muthén B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.
  • Oberst U., Wegmann E., Stodt B., Brand M., Chamarro A. (2017). Negative consequences from heavy social networking in adolescents: The mediating role of fear of missing out. Journal of Adolescence, 55(1), 51–60.
  • Observatorio Vasco de la Juventud. (2021). Juventud Vasca [Basque Youth]. https://www.gazteaukera.euskadi.eus/observatorio-vasco-juventud/-/noticia/2022/nuevo-informe-del-observatorio-vasco-de-la-juventud-juventud-vasca-20202021/
  • Pertegal M.-Á., Oliva A., Rodríguez-Meirinhos A. (2019). Development and validation of the Scale of Motives for Using Social Networking Sites (SMU-SNS) for adolescents and youths. PLoS One, 14(12), e0225781.
  • Pew Research Center. (2022). Teens, social media and technology 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/
  • Pontes H., Kuss D., Griffiths M. D. (2015). Clinical psychology of Internet addiction: A review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 4, 11–23.
  • Qu G., Hu W., Meng J., Wang X., Su W., Liu H., Ma S., Sun C., Huang C., Lowe S., Sun Y. (2023). Association between screen time and developmental and behavioral problems among children in the United States: Evidence from 2018 to 2020 NSCH. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 161, 140–149.
  • Raacke J., Bonds-Raacke J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.
  • Rosell J., Vergés A., Torres Irribarra D., Sepúlveda-Caro S., Flores K. (2022). Motives of use and Internet addiction: Development and evidence of validity of a scale to evaluate motives of Internet use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 2977–2998.
  • Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
  • Sábada C., Garcia-Manglano J., Fernández A., López C., Serrano C. (2021). De moderados a hiperconectados: Seis perfiles deuso del móvil y su impacto en el bienestar personal [From moderate to hyper-connected: Six profiles of mobile usage and their impact on personal wellbeing]. El Observatorio Social. Fundación la Caixa. https://elobservatoriosocial.fundacionlacaixa.org/es/-/de-moderados-a-hiperconectados-seis-perfiles-de-uso-del-movil-y-su-impacto-en-el-bienestar-personal
  • Sheldon P., Bryant K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97.
  • Smock A. D., Ellison N. B., Lampe C., Wohn D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: A uses and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322–2329.
  • Stockdale L. A., Coyne S. M. (2020). Bored and online: Reasons for using social media, problematic social networking site use, and behavioral outcomes across the transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 79(1), 173–183.
  • Su C.-Y., Chiu C.-H., Chou Y.-C., Chico C. (2018). Patterns of motives for social network site use among sixth grade pupils in Taiwan. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1781–1793.
  • Svicher A., Fioravanti G., Casale S. (2021). Identifying the central symptoms of problematic social networking sites use through network analysis. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 10(3), 767–778.
  • Teppers E., Luyckx K. A., Klimstra T., Goossens L. (2014). Loneliness and Facebook motives in adolescence: A longitudinal inquiry into directionality of effect. Journal of Adolescence, 37(5), 691–699.
  • Twenge J. M., Haidt J., Lozano J., Cummins K. M. (2022). Specification curve analysis shows that social media use is linked to poor mental health, especially among girls. Acta Psychologica, 224, 103512.
  • Valencia-Ortiz R., Cabero Almenara J., Garay Ruiz U. (2020). Influencia del género en el uso de redes sociales por el alumnado y profesorado. Campus Virtuales, 9(1), 29–39.
  • Valenzuela S., Park N., Kee K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875–901.
  • Varona M. N., Muela A., Machimbarrena J. M. (2022). Problematic use or addiction? A scoping review on conceptual and operational definitions of negative social networking sites use in adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 134, 107400.
  • Wavemaker, & LIVE Panel. (2020). Informe sobre los adolescentes [Report on adolescents]. https://wavemakerglobal.com/es/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2021/04/LIVE-Panel-Teenagers.pdf
  • We Are social & Meltwater. (2023). Digital 2023. October global statshot report. https://wearesocial.com/es/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/10/DataReportal-GDR013-20231019-Digital-2023-October-Global-Statshot-Report-v02-1.pdf
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet