Beautiful and disgusting politicsTaming evil and the importance of controlling the uncontrollable

  1. Jaseff Raziel Yauri-Miranda
Revista:
Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

ISSN: 2340-8510,  2340-9134

Año de publicación: 2018

Título del ejemplar: Disidencia y Sistema/Sistema y disidencia ¿Es todavía posible hoy una crítica al sistema desde las prácticas artísticas?

Volumen: 6

Número: 2

Páginas: 49-59

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ausart aldizkaria: arte ikerkuntzarako aldizkaria = journal for research in art = revista para la investigación en arte

Resumen

Evil doing is part of everyday social life and is extremely difficult to be counter-balanced by “good”practices, let alone to be eliminated. Even in the realm of abstract politics, there is no simple solution or way to understand their overlapping nature. In that sense, this study explores the relationship between both sides through aesthetics and constructs a dialogical analysis transposed to politics. This relationship shows that beautiful and disgusting politics are not simply two sides of the same coin. The former has a limited potential to counterbalance the latter and, paradoxically, without its counter-part it has a limited potential to promote social transformations.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barel, Efrat et al. 2010. “Surviving the Holocaust: A meta-analysis of the long-term sequelae of a genocide”. Psychological Bulletin 136(5): 677
  • Bennett, Jill. 2003. “The aesthetics of sense-memory: Theorising trauma through the visual arts”. In Regimes of memory, ed. by Katharine Hodgkin & Susannah Radstone, 40-52. London: Routledge
  • Best, Victoria & Kathryn Robson. 2005. “Memory and innovation in post-Holocaust France”. French Studies 59(1):1-8
  • Carroll, David. (1987) 1990. Paraesthetics: Foucault, Lyotard, Derrida. New York: Collman
  • Garcia, Fernando Gomes, Breno Mendes & Andrea Vieira, eds. 2014. Teoría da história em debate: Modernidade, narrativa, interdisciplinaridade. Belo Horizonte: Paco
  • Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford CA: Stanford University
  • Han, Byung-Chul. 2015. The transparency society. Stanford CA: Stanford University
  • Lang, Berel. 1991. Writing and the moral self. London: Routledge
  • Luckhurst, Roger. 2013. The trauma question. London: Routledge
  • Marques, Vasco Baptista. 2017. “The dissidence of one with oneself: Lying in Vladimir Jankélévitch”. In: From Kierkegaard to Heidegger: 2nd Workshop of the project Experimentation and Dissidence, eds. José Miranda Justo, Fernando M.F. Silva & Paulo Alexandre Lima. Lisbon: University of Lisbon
  • Moran, Patricia. 2007. Virginia Woolf, Jean Rhys, and the aesthetics of trauma. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  • Rancière, Jacques. (1995) 2015. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. Edited and translated by Steven Corcoran. London: Bloomsbury
  • Rosa Camacho, Isaac. 2004. El vano ayer. Madrid: Planeta
  • Trías Sagnier, Eugenio. (1982) 2011. Lo bello y lo siniestro. Barcelona: Debolsillo
  • Wilde, Oscar. (1905) 2010. De profundis. London: Modern Library
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet