Enfoque para evaluar la influencia de una planta de valorización energéticaestudio de un caso en Gipuzkoa (País Vasco, España)

  1. Loreto Santa-Marina 1
  2. Amaia Irizar 1
  3. Aitana Lertxundi 1
  4. Nerea Urbieta 1
  5. Ziortza Barroeta 1
  6. Alba Jimeno-Romero 1
  7. Miren Begoña Zubero 1
  8. Jesus Ibarluzea 1
  1. 1 Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biogipuzkoa
    info

    Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biogipuzkoa

    San Sebastián, España

    ROR 01a2wsa50

Revista:
Revista de Salud Ambiental

ISSN: 1697-2791

Año de publicación: 2024

Volumen: 24

Número: 1

Páginas: 54-63

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de Salud Ambiental

Resumen

In the European Union, the escalating generation of waste, together with the difficulties in finding new places for its disposal, have led to choose for incineration as an alternative to the management of non-reusable or recyclable waste, recovering it and generating energy. The incineration of waste, however, generates a series of contaminants that have been associated with effects on human health and the environment. Several studies have analysed the impact produced by energy recovery plants, by comparing the concentration of pollutants both in air and in biological samples donated by the population living near and far from these facilities. A notable limitation in existing research is the scarcity of baseline data on dioxins, furans, and PCBs in air and in the general population prior to the plant ́s start of operations. Such data facilitates meaningful comparisons with post-start-up levels. This article delineates the methodology employed to assess the impact on air quality and public health resulting from the implementation of an energy recovery facility through an urban waste incineration (waste-to-energy plant) in Gipuzkoa, located in the Basque Country, Spain. This methodology includes the measurement of the levels of contaminants in air, the level of exposure of the population by measuring the body load of contaminants, and the concentrations in soil and locally produced food. Furthermore, the health status of the population has been evaluated in both the short and long term, as well as the assessment of the risk from exposure to air pollution.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • European Commission, 2020. Circular Economy Action Plan. For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Available in: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en.
  • European Parliament, 2017. Amendments adopted by the European parliament on 14 March 2017 on the proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2008/98/EC on waste (COM(2015)0595 e C8-0382/2015 e 2015/0275(COD)). Strasbourg.
  • Subiza-Pérez M, Santa Marina L, Irizar A, Gallastegi M, Anabitarte A, Urbieta N, Babarro I, Molinuevo A, Vozmediano L, Ibarluzea J. 2020. Explaining social acceptance of a municipal waste incineration plant through sociodemographic and psycho-environmental variables. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114504.
  • Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, Bezirtzoglou E. 2020. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front. Public Health. 8, 14.
  • Martí-Cid R, Perelló G, Domingo J L. 2009. Dietary exposure to metals by individuals living near a hazardous waste incinerator in Catalonia, Spain: temporal trend. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 131, 245-54.
  • Mari M, Díaz-Ferrero J, Schuhmacher M, Nadal M, Domingo JL. 2013. Health risks of environmental exposure to PCDD/Fs near a hazardous waste incinerator in Catalonia, Spain. Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response. 3(2).
  • Louro H, Heinälä M, Bessems J, Buekers J, Vermeire T, Woutersen M et al. 2019. Human biomonitoring in health risk assessment in Europe: Current practices and recommendations for the future. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 222(5), 727-37.
  • Angerer J, Ewers U, Wilhelm M. 2007. Human biomonitoring: state of the art. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 210(3-4), 201-28.
  • Folinsbee LJ, Raven P. 2001. Air pollution: acute and chronic effects. Proceedings of Marathon Medicine 2000.
  • Mannucci PM, Harari S, Martinelli I, Franchini M. 2015. Effects on health of air pollution: a narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 10, 657-62.
  • Colonna KJ, Koutrakis P, Kinney PL, Cooke RM, Evans JS. 2022. Mortality attributable to long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter: insights from the epidemiologic evidence for understudied locations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56(11), 6799-812.
  • Liang R, Chen R, Yin P, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Burnett R et al. 2022. Associations of long-term exposure to fine particulate matter and its constituents with cardiovascular mortality: A prospective cohort study in China. Environ. Int. 162, 107156.
  • Gheissari R, Liao J, Garcia E, Pavlovic N, Gilliland FD, Xiang AH, et al. 2022. Health outcomes in children associated with prenatal and early-life exposures to air pollution: a narrative review. Toxics. 10(8), 458.
  • Keplac P, Locatelli I, Korosec S, Kunzli N, Kukec A. 2018. Ambient air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: A comprehensive review and identification of environmental public health challenges. Environ. Res. 16, 144-59.
  • Schwartz J. 2000. Harvesting and long term exposure effects in the relation between air pollution and mortality. Am. J. Epidemiol. 151(5), 440-8.
  • Baek K, Park JT, Kwak K.2022. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer risks in relation to environmental waste incinerator emissions: a meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Epidemiology and Health. 44.
  • Parkes B, Hansell AL, Ghosh RE, Douglas P, Fecht D, Wellesley et al. 2020. Risk of congenital anomalies near municipal waste incinerators in England and Scotland: Retrospective population- based cohort study. Environ. Int. 134, 104845.
  • Yu P, Guo S, Xu R, Ye T, Li S, Sim MR et al. 2021b. Cohort studies of long-term exposure to outdoor particulate matter and risks of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Innovation, 2(3).
  • Yu G, Chen Y, Tang J, Lin Z, Zheng F, Zheng C et al. 2021a. Meta- analyses of maternal exposure to atmospheric particulate matter and risk of congenital anomalies in offspring. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28(40), 55869-87.
  • Bena A, Gandini M, Cadum E, Procopio E, Salamina G, Orengia, M et al. 2019. Risk perception in the population living near the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant: Survey results before start-up and communication strategies. BMC Public Health. 19 (1): 1-9.
  • Zhang X. 2021. Conflicts and order: controversies over municipal solid waste incineration in China. PhD Thesis.
  • Campo L, Bechtold P, Borsari L, Fustinoni S. 2019. A systematic review on biomonitoring of individuals living near or working at solid waste incinerator plants. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 49(6), 479-519.
  • Green RH. 1979. Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bernstein BB, Zalinski J. 1983. Optimum sampling design and power tests for environmental biologists. J. Environ. Manage. 16(1), 35-43. United States.
  • Stewart-Oaten A, Murdoch WW, Parker KL. 1986. Environmental Impact Assessment: “Pseudoreplication” in Time? Ecology. 67(4), 929–40.
  • Underwood A. 1992. Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 161(2), 145–78.
  • Underwood A. 1993. The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Austral. Ecology. 18(1), 99–116.
  • Stewart-Oaten A, Bence JR. 2001. Temporal and Spatial Variation in Environmental Impact Assessment. Ecol. Monogr. 71(2), 305-39.
  • Santa-Marina L, Barroeta Z, Irizar A, Alvarez JI, Abad E, Muñoz- Arnanz J, Jimenez B et al. 2023a. Characterization of PCDD/F and dl-PCB levels in air in Gipuzkoa (Basque Country, Spain). Environ. Res. 115901.
  • Santa-Marina L, Irizar A, Barroeta Z, Abad E, Lertxundi A, Ibarluzea J et al. 2023b. Serum levels of PCDDs, PCDFs and dl-PCBs in general population residing far and near from an urban waste treatment plant under construction in Gipuzkoa, Basque Country (Spain). Environ. Res. 236, 116721.
  • Domínguez-Berjón MF, Borrell C, Cano-Serral G, Esnaola S, Nolasco A, Pasarín MI et al.2008. Construcción de un índice de privación a partir de datos censales en grandes ciudades españolas (Proyecto MEDEA). Gaceta Sanitaria, 22, 179-87.
  • Lertxundi A, Martínez MD, Ayerdi M, Álvarez J, Maiztegi M, Basterrechea, et al. 2011. Prenatal exposure toPM2.5 and its relationship with low birth weight in the inma-gipuzkoa cohort. In ISEE Conference Abstracts 23 (Vol. 2011, No. 1).
  • Van Buuren S, Brand JP, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, Rubin DB. 2006. Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation. Journal of statistical computation and simulation, 76(12), 1049-64.
  • Besag J, York J, Mollié A. 1991. Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the institute of statistical mathematics, 43, 1-20.
  • Diputación foral de Gipuzkoa: https://www.gipuzkoa.eus/es/web/ingurumena/residuos-urbanos/infraestructuras.