Agency, Institutions and Regional Resilience: An Approach from the Basque Region

  1. Magro, Edurne
  2. Uyarra, Elvira
  3. Valdaliso, Jesus M.
Libro:
Towards Resilient Organizations and Societies

ISBN: 9783030820718 9783030820725

Año de publicación: 2021

Páginas: 277-304

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82072-5_11 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

Regional resilience, understood as the regional ability to resist, adapt to, and create new regional paths from external shocks, is one of the most explored issues in the last years in the literature of evolutionary economic geography. However, most of the literature has focused on analysing the regional responses in terms of structural economic change, underplaying the role that institutions and agency play. This chapter will deepen into the role that policy and agency play in two different types of regional resilience, namely resilience to macroeconomic fluctuations and resilience to structural changes. Specifically, it focuses on the role of institutional entrepreneurs and collective agency as mechanisms of change. This means adopting a systemic understanding of regional resilience. The chapter contributes with an historical analysis of the Basque Country region, an old industrial region that has been able to resist, recover and renew after different shocks (economic and financial crisis and structural changes) in the last forty years. The case will shed light into the different institutional and agency factors that shape different types of resilience (adaptation and adaptability capacities), which are intrinsically linked to exploration and exploitation capabilities. Indeed, the chapter focuses on the different policy responses and on the role of agency in shaping resilience, both from an ex-ante and an ex-post perspective. Even though policy denotes a high degree of publicness, the chapter highlights the role of other actors (i.e. private actors, individuals and KIOs) in regional resilience.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1–18.
  • Aranguren, M. J., Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Valdaliso, J. M. (2012). Estrategias para la construcción de ventajas competitivas regionales. El caso del País Vasco. Marcial Pons.
  • Bailey, D., Bellandi, M., Caloffi, A., & De Propris, L. (2010). Place-renewing leadership: Trajectories of change for mature manufacturing regions in Europe. Policy Studies, 31(4), 457–474.
  • Bailey, D., & Berkeley, N. (2014). Regional responses to recession: The role of the West Midlands Regional Taskforce. Regional Studies, 48(11), 1797–1812.
  • Battilana, J., & D’aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, 31, 58.
  • Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Ideas and policy change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(2), 239–258.
  • Billington, M. G., Karlsen, J., Mathisen, L., & Pettersen, I. B. (2017). Unfolding the relationship between resilient firms and the region. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 425–442.
  • Birch, K., Mackinnon, D., & Cumbers, A. (2010). Old industrial regions in Europe: A comparative assessment of economic performance. Regional Studies, 44(1), 35–53.
  • Boinand, A., & Van Eeten, M. J. G. (2014). The resilient organization: A critical appraisal. Public Management Review, 15(3), 429–445.
  • Boschma, R. (2015). Towards and evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 49(5), 733–751.
  • Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2014). Regional resilience: An agency perspective. Regional Studies, 48(5), 923–935.
  • Brooks, C. (2017). Governance, civic leadership and resilience. In N. Williams & T. Vorley (Eds.), Creating resilient economies: Entrepreneurship, growth and development in uncertain times (pp. 125–141). Edward Elgar.
  • Campbell, J. L. (2010). Institutional reproduction and change. In G. Morgan, J. L. Campbell, C. Crouch, O. K. Pedersen, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative institutional analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Charron, N., & Lapuente, V. (2018). Quality of government in EU regions: Spatial and temporal patterns. QoG Working Paper Series, 2018(1), 1.
  • Cortinovis, N., Xiao, J., Boschma, R., & van Oort, F. (2017). Quality of government and social capital as drivers of regional diversification in Europe. The Journal of Economic Geography, 17, 1179–1208.
  • Crescenzi, R., Luca, D., & Milio, S. (2016). The geography of the economic crisis in Europe: National macroeconomic conditions, regional structural factors and short-term economic performance. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(1), 13–32.
  • Croenewegen, J., & van der Steen, M. (2007). The evolutionary policy maker. Journal of Economic Issues, 41(2), 351–358.
  • Cruz-Castro, L., Holl, A., Rama, R., & Sanz-Menendez, L. (2018). Economic crisis and company R&D in Spain: Do regional and policy factors matter? Industry and Innovation, 25(8), 729–751.
  • Cuadrado, J. R., & Maroto, A. (2016). Unbalanced regional resilience to the economic crisis in Spain: A tale of specialisation and productivity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9, 153–178.
  • Cueto, M. B., Mayor, M., & Suárez, P. (2017). La resiliencia de las regiones españolas después de la gran recesión. Consejo Económico y Social del Principado de Asturias.
  • David, L. (2018). Agency and resilience in the time of regional economic crisis. European Planning Studies, 26(5), 1041–1059.
  • DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and culture (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  • Elola, A., Parrilli, M. D., & Rabelloti, R. (2013). The resilience of clusters in the context of increasing globalization: The Basque wind energy value chain. European Planning Studies, 21(7), 989–1006.
  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.
  • Eraydin, A. (2016). The role of regional policies along with the external and endogenous factors in the resilience of regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(1), 217–234.
  • Etxabe, I., & Valdaliso, J. M. (2016). Measuring structural social capital in a cluster policy network: Insights from the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 24(5), 884–903.
  • Evans, R., & Karecha, J. (2014). Staying on top: Why is Munich so resilient and successful? European Planning Studies, 22(6), 1259–1279.
  • Evenhuis, E. (2017a). New directions in researching regional economic resilience and adaptation. Geography Compass, 11(11), e12333.
  • Evenhuis, E. (2017b). Institutional change in cities and regions: A path dependency approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10, 509–526.
  • Flanagan, K., & Uyarra, E. (2016). Four dangers in innovation policy studies—And how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 177–188.
  • Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40, 702–713.
  • Foray, D. (2014). Smart specialisation: Opportunities and challenges for regional innovation policy (pp. 25–30). Routledge.
  • Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to research and innovation strategies for smart specialisations (RIS3). European Commission, Brussels.
  • Fratesi, U., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2016). The crisis and regional employment in Europe: What role for sheltered economies? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(1), 33–57.
  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2001). Path creation as a process of mindful deviation. In R. Garud & P. Karnøe (Eds.), Path dependence and creation (pp. 1–38). NJ, Mahwah: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277–300.
  • Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774.
  • Gingrich, J. (2015). Varying costs to change? Institutional change in the public sector. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 28(1), 41–60.
  • Gong, H., & Hassink, R. (2019). Co-evolution in contemporary economic geography: Towards a theoretical framework. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1344–1355.
  • González-Bravo, M., López, S., & Valdaliso, J. M. (2018). Coping with economic crises: Cluster associations and firm performance in the Basque Country. In F. Belussi & J. L. Hervás-Oliver (Eds.), Cluster advantage and firm performance (pp. 245–262). Springer.
  • Grabher, G. (1993). The weakness of strong ties: The lock-in of regional development in the Rhur area. In G. Grabher (Ed.), The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks (pp. 255–277). Routledge.
  • Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2020). Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 704–723.
  • Grillitsch, M., & Sotarauta, M. (2018). Regional growth paths: From structure to agency and back (Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/01, CIRCLE).
  • Henning, M. (2019). Time should tell (more): Evolutionary economic geography and the challenge of history. Regional Studies, 53(4), 602–613.
  • Henning, M., Stam, E., & Wenting, R. (2013). Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation? Regional Studies, 47(8), 1348–1362.
  • Holl, A., & Rama, R. (2016). Persistence of innovative activities in times of crisis: The case of the Basque Country. European Planning Studies, 24(10), 1863–1883.
  • Isaksen, A. (2015). Industrial development in thin regions: Trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography, 15(3), 585–600.
  • Kakderi, C., & Tasopoulou, A. (2017). Regional economic resilience: The role of national and regional policies. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1435–1453.
  • Kay, A. (2006). The dynamics of public policy: Theory and evidence. Edward Elgar.
  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Little Brown.
  • Landabaso, M. (2012). What public policies can and cannot do for regional development. In P. Cooke, M. D. Parrilli, & J. L. Curbelo (Eds.), Innovation, global challenge, and territorial resilience (pp. 364–381). Edward Elgar.
  • Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In The Sage handbook of organization studies (p. 215). Sage.
  • Magro, E., Navarro, M., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2014). Coordination-mix: The hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367–389.
  • Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657–79.
  • Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2009). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge University Press.
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.
  • Martin, R. (2010). Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27.
  • Martin, R. (2012). Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1–32.
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437.
  • Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2015). On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 1–42.
  • Martin, R., Sunley, P., Gardiner, B., & Tyler, P. (2016). How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies, 50(4), 561–585.
  • Morgan, K. (2016). Collective entrepreneurship: The Basque model of innovation. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1544–1560.
  • Nauwelaers, C., & Wijtnes, R. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation policy in Europe: Measurement and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Navarro, M. (2015). Las estrategias territoriales para la transformación productiva. Reflexión desde el caso del País Vasco. Icade. Revista de las Facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 96, 75–104.
  • Navarro, M., Valdaliso, J. M., Aranguren, M. J., & Magro, E. (2014). A holistic approach to regional strategies: The case of the Basque Country. Science and Public Policy, 41, 532–547.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.
  • OECD. (2011). OECD reviews of regional innovation: Basque Country, Spain. OECD.
  • Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
  • Pugalis, L., Gray, N., & Townsend, A. (2017). The resilience of growth strategies. In N. Williams & T. Vorley (Eds.), Creating resilient economies: Entrepreneurship, growth and development in uncertain times (pp. 160–174). Edward Elgar.
  • Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.
  • Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 3, 27–44.
  • Steen, M. (2016). Reconsidering path creation in economic geography: Aspects of agency, temporality and methods. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1605–1622.
  • Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 3–39). Oxford University Press.
  • Tomlinson, P. R., & Branston, J. R. (2014). Turning the tide: Prospects for an industrial renaissance in the North Staffordshire ceramics industrial district. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(3), 489–507.
  • Uyarra, E., Flanagan, K., Magro, E., Wilson, J. R., & Sotarauta, M. (2017). Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4), 559–568.
  • Uyarra, E., & Ramlogan, R. (2012). Cluster policy: A review of the evidence. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), University of Manchester.
  • Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844.
  • Valdaliso, J. M. (2015). The Basque Country: Past trajectory and path dependency in policy- and strategy-making. In J. M. Valdaliso & J. R. Wilson (Eds.), Strategies for shaping territorial competitiveness. Routledge.
  • Valdaliso, J. M. (2020). Accounting for the resilience of the machine tool industry in Spain (c. 1960–2015). Business History, 62(4), 637–662.
  • Valdaliso, J. M., Elola, A., & Franco, S. (2016). Do clusters follow the industry life cycle? Diversity of cluster evolution in old industrial regions. Competitiveness Review, 26(1), 66–86.
  • Valdaliso, J. M., Magro, E., Navarro, M., Aranguren, M. J., & Wilson, J. R. (2014). Path dependence in policies supporting smart specialization strategies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 390–408.
  • Valdaliso, J. M. & Wilson, J. R. (Eds.). (2015). “Introduction”, Strategies for shaping territorial competitiveness (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
  • Webber, D. J., Healy, A., & Bristow, G. (2018). Regional growth paths and resilience: A European analysis. Economic Geography, 98(4), 355–375.
  • Witt, U. (2003). Economic policy making in evolutionary perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 77–94.