Divulgadores, no influencerscomunicación de nutricionistas en redes sociales

  1. Iñigo Marauri-Castillo 1
  2. María del Mar Rodríguez-González 1
  3. Flora Marín-Murillo 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Journal:
Vivat Academia

ISSN: 1575-2844

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 157

Pages: 1-27

Type: Article

DOI: 10.15178/VA.2024.157.E1495 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Vivat Academia

Abstract

Introduction: Food generates a growing interest among the population, in particular among young people. The rise of social networks makes them a source of relevant information. In these social networks, expert profiles coexist with untrained influencers.Methodology: This article analyses the key aspects of the presence on social networks of seven of the most important nutritionists in this field in Spanish using a qualitative technique based on in-depth interviews. Results: The relevance of Instagram as the most important network in nutrition is confirmed. Six of the seven participants refuse to be classified as influencers, a concept to which they attribute objectives and values with which they do not feel identified, and prefer to define themselves as communicators. Nutritionists stress the importance of adapting the message to the characteristics of each of the social networks and only two of the seven combine personal and professional issues in their content. Discussion and conclusions:The role of nutrionists on social networks as disseminators acquires a particular relevance due to the low quality of content related to food. However, in the literature about communication, food and social networks, limits between trained dieticians and influencers are unclear. Connected to that question, the results of the qualitative research are revealing because they show the interviewed nutritionists want to have influence, but they do not want to be consider as influencers. In contrast to the negative connotation they give to this concept, they defend coherence and authenticity. They accept branded content if it is clear and transparent, although three of the seven interviewees say they have been witnesses of bad practice.

Funding information

Funders