Approaching the typology and diachrony of morphological reversals

Referencias bibliográficas

• 10.1515/9783110823127.1
• 10.1017/S0022226706004440
• 10.1017/CBO9780511486234
• 10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_1
• Bräuer, (1969), Slavische Sprachwissenschaft. III. Formenlehre
• Carstairs, (1987), Allomorphy in inflexion
• 10.1017/CBO9781139164344
• 10.1353/lan.2007.0006
• 10.1017/CBO9781139206983
• 10.1515/prbs.1992.4.2.91
• 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0005
• Dressler, (1985), Historical semantics – historical word formation, pp. 97
• 10.1002/9780470756393.ch12
• 10.1007/1-4020-4066-0_2
• Friedman, (1986), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, pp. 168
• Friedman, (2010), Ex Anatolia Lux: Anatolian and Indo-European studies in honor of H. Craig Melchert on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday, pp. 31
• Gaeng, (1984), Collapse and reorganization of the Latin nominal flection as reflected in epigraphic sources
• Grandgent, (1962), An introduction to Vulgar Latin
• 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654277.003.0005
• Harbour, (2008), Morphosemantic number: From Kiowa noun classes to UG number features
• 10.1162/LING_a_00061
• 10.1017/S0022226705003683
• Hawkins, (2011), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, pp. 206
• 10.1093/jss/12.2.169
• Igartua, (2005), Historische Sprachforschung, 118, pp. 294
• Igartua, (2005), Origen y evolución de la flexión nominal eslava
• 10.1075/jhl.6.1.05iga
• Kihm, (2017), Defaults in morphological theory, pp. 40
• Krause, (1960), Tocharisches Elementarbuch. I. Grammatik.
• Lahne, (2007), On deriving polarity effects. 1-2-many, pp. 1
• Lecarme, (2002), Many morphologies, pp. 109
• Matthews, (1972), Inflectional morphology. A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation
• 10.1515/9783110895148
• 10.1086/464544
• Mohl, (1899), Introduction à la chronologie du latin vulgaire
• Moravcsik, (2013), Introducing linguistic typology
• 10.1515/9783110802603.321
• Nahtigal, (1961), Die slavischen Sprachen. Abriss der vergleichenden Grammatik
• Nilsson, (2016), Diversity in African languages, pp. 451
• Peyrot, (2008), Variation and change in Tocharian B, 10.1163/9789004358218
• 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004
• Pinault, (2008), Chrestomathie tokharienne. Textes et grammaire
• 10.1515/ling.1979.17.7-8.611
• Plungian, (2010), Počemu jazyki takie raznye
• Priestly, (1993), The Slavonic languages, pp. 388
• Ross, (1988), Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of eastern Melanesia
• 10.1075/loall.10
• 10.1007/978-94-007-4768-5_9
• Serzisko, (1982), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen. Teil II: Die Techniken und ihr Zusammenhung in Einzelsprachen, pp. 179
• Šewc-Schuster, (1984), Gramatika hornjoserbskeje rěče. I. Fonologija, fonetika, morfologija
• 10.1515/ling.1979.17.1-2.153
• Speiser, (1938), Language, pp. 187
• Šul´ga, (1985), Obščeslavjanskij lingvističeskij atlas. Materialy i issledovanija, pp. 218
• Tiersma, (1982), Language, pp. 832
• Timberlake, (2004), A reference grammar of Russian
• Trommer, (2008), The formal typology of morphological polarity
• Van Windekens, (1979), Le tokharien confronté avec les autres langues indo-eruropéennes
• 10.1075/z.176
• Wasow, (2005), Morphology and the web of grammar. Essays in memory of Steven G. Lapointe, pp. 265
• 10.1017/CBO9780511486883
• Weigel, (1993), Papers from the 29th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society., 1, pp. 467
• Winter, (1962), Language = Kleine Schriften / Selected Writings, pp. 111
• 10.1086/464244
• 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0006
• Wurzel, (1989), Inflectional morphology and naturalness
• Žolobov, (1998), Symbolik und historische Dynamik des slavischen Duals
• Žukova, (1972), Grammatika korjakskogo jazyka: Fonetika, morfologija