Los conceptos de patriarcado y androcentrismo en el estudio sociológico y antropológico de las sociedades de mayoría musulmana

  1. González Vázquez, Araceli
Revista:
Papers: revista de sociología

ISSN: 0210-2862 2013-9004

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 98

Número: 3

Páginas: 489-504

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/PAPERS/V98N3.335 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papers: revista de sociología

Resumen

En este artículo, realizamos un examen de las conceptualizaciones del patriarcado que mayor influencia ejercen actualmente sobre la forma en que los sociólogos y los antropólogos abordan el estudio de las desigualdades sociales y de género en las sociedades de mayoría musulmana. Igualmente, explicamos el concepto de androcentrismo y evaluamos su fuerza actual como alternativa conceptual y epistemológica frente al concepto de patriarcado.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acker, J. (1989). The problem with patriarchy. Sociology, 23, 235-240.
  • Aixelà Cabré, Y. (2000). Mujeres en Marruecos: Un análisis desde el parentesco y el género. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.
  • Al-Yousuf, H. (2006). Negotiating faith and identity in Muslim-Christian marriages in Britain. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 17 (3), 317-329.
  • Alon, I. (1997). Bargaining with God. Le Muséon, 110 (1-2), 223-247.
  • Anderson, J. W. (2003). New media, new publics reconfiguring the public sphere of Islam. Social Research, 70 (3), 887-906.
  • Badran, M. (1985). Islam, patriarchy, and feminism in the Middle East. Trends in History, 4 (1), 49-71.
  • Badran, M. (2006). Islamic feminism revisited. Al-Akhram Weekly, 781, s. p.
  • Badran, M. (2010). Où en est le feminism islamique?. Critique Internationale, 46, 25-44.
  • Bartkowsky, J. P. y Read, J. G. (2000). To veil or not to veil?: A case study of identity negotiation among muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society, 14 (3), 395-417.
  • Beechey, V. (1979). On Patriarchy. Feminist Review, 3, 66-82.
  • Caldwell, J. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. Londres: Academic Press.
  • Dwyer, C. (1999). Veiled meanings: Young British muslim women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place and Culture, 6 (1), 5-26.
  • Eickelman, D. F. y Anderson, J. W. (2003). New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. Bloomington: Indiana Series in Middle East Studies.
  • Esposito, J. L. y Burgat, F. (2003). Modernizing Islam: Religion in the public sphere in Europe and the Middle East. Londres: Hurst.
  • Gottfried, H. (1998). Beyond Patriarchy: Theorizing Gender and Class. Sociology, 32 (3), 451-468.
  • Graham, M. y Khosravi, S. (2002). Reordering public and private in Iranian cyberspace: identity, politics and mobilization. Identities: Global Studies in Power and Culture, 9 (2), 219-246.
  • Haghighat, E. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Neopatriarchy and Female Labor Force Participation in Islamic Countries. Electronic Journal of Sociology. <http://www.sociology.org/content/2005/tier1/__islamLaborforce.pdf>
  • Hassan, R. (1991). Muslim women and post-patriarchal Islam. En: Cooey, P. M.; Eakin, W. R. y McDaniel, J. B. (eds.). After Patriarchy. Feminist Theory of the World Religions. Maryknoll, Nueva York: Orbis Books.
  • Hassan, R. (2001). Challenging the stereotypes of fundamentalism: An Islamic feminist perspective. The Muslim World, 91 (1-2), 55-70.
  • Hatem, M. (1986a). The enduring alliance of Nationalism and Patriarchy: The case of Modern Egypt. Feminist Issues, 6 (1), 20-43.
  • Hatem, M. (1986b). The politics of sexuality and gender in segregated patriarchal systems: The case of 18th and 19th century Egypt. Feminist Studies, 12, 251-274.
  • Hatem, M. (1987). Class and patriarchy as competing paradigms for the study of Middle Eastern women. Comparative Studies on Society and History, 29 (4), 811-818.
  • Hefner, R. W. (2001). Public Islam and the problem of democratization. Sociology of Religion, 62 (4), 491-514.
  • Hutson, A. S. (2001). Women, men and patriarchal bargaining in an Islamic sufiorder: The Tijaniyya in Kano, Nigeria, 1937 to the present. Gender and Society, 15 (5), 734-753.
  • Joseph, S. (1993). Connectivity and patriarchy among urban working class families en Lebanon. Ethos, 21 (4).
  • Joseph, S. (1994). Brother/sister relationships: Connectivity, love and power in the reproduction of Arab patriarchy. American Ethnologist, 21 (1), 50-73.
  • Joseph, S. (1996). Patriarchy and development in the Arab world. Gender and Development, 4 (2), 14-19.
  • Joseph, S. (1997). The public/private: The imagined boundary in the imagined nation/state community: The Lebanese case. Feminist Review, 57, 73-92.
  • Joseph, S. (2001). Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East. Nueva York, Syracuse: University Press.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1985). Women in rural production systems: Products and policies. París: UNESCO.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2 (3), 274-290.
  • Khan, S. (2002). Aversion and desire: Negotiating muslim female identity in the Diaspora. Toronto: Women’s Press.
  • Knauss, P. S. (1987). The persistence of patriarchy: Class, gender and ideology in twentieth century Algeria. New York: Praeger publishers.
  • Lentin, R. (1995). I’ll be a post-feminist in post-patriarchy: Reflexivity is a feminist issue [en línea]. Dublín: Department of Sociology. Trinity College. <http://ireland.iol.ie/~mazzoldi/toolsforchange/postmet/feminist.html>.
  • Lorber, J. y Bandlamundi, L. (1993). The dynamics of marital bargaining in male infertility. Gender and Society, 7 (1), 32-49.
  • Moghadam, V. M. (2004). Patriarchy in transition: women and the changing family in the Middle East. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35 (2), 137-162.
  • Moghadam, V. M. (2002). Islamic feminism and its descontents: toward a resolution of the debate. Signs, 27 (4), 1135-1171.
  • Pollert, A. (1996). Gender and class revisited; or, the poverty of “Patriarchy”. Sociology, 30 (4), 639-659.
  • Rosen, L. (1984). Bargaining for reality: The construction of social relations in a Muslim community. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Safi, O. (2000). Bargaining with baraka: Persian Sufism, “Mysticism”, and Premodern politics. The Muslim World, 90, 259-287.
  • Salvatore, A. y Eickelman, D. F. (2004). Public Islam and the common good. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
  • Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1992). But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation. Boston: Beacon.
  • Schwenken, H. y Ullrich, C. (2003). We’ll be post-feminists in post-patriarchy: Doing feminism between theoretical concepts and political strategies. Comunicación presentada en la Workshop Feminist politics in the 21st century. Theoretical concepts, Political strategies. Universidad de Dortmund, 4 de junio.
  • Shaheed, F. (1994). Controlled or autonomous: Identity and the experience of the network, Women living under muslim laws. Signs, 19 (4), 997-1019.
  • Sharabi, H. (1988). Neopatriarchy: A theory of distorted change in Arab society. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shibles, W. (1991). The myth of patriarchy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 25, 305-318.
  • Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23 (2), 213-234.
  • Yount, K. M. (2005). Women’s family power and gender preference in Minya, Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (2), 410-428.