Los conceptos de patriarcado y androcentrismo en el estudio sociológico y antropológico de las sociedades de mayoría musulmana

  1. González Vázquez, Araceli
Revista:
Papers: revista de sociología

ISSN: 0210-2862 2013-9004

Año de publicación: 2013

Volumen: 98

Número: 3

Páginas: 489-504

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5565/REV/PAPERS/V98N3.335 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDDD editor

Otras publicaciones en: Papers: revista de sociología

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

En este artículo, realizamos un examen de las conceptualizaciones del patriarcado que mayor influencia ejercen actualmente sobre la forma en que los sociólogos y los antropólogos abordan el estudio de las desigualdades sociales y de género en las sociedades de mayoría musulmana. Igualmente, explicamos el concepto de androcentrismo y evaluamos su fuerza actual como alternativa conceptual y epistemológica frente al concepto de patriarcado.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Acker, J. (1989). The problem with patriarchy. Sociology, 23, 235-240.
  • Aixelà Cabré, Y. (2000). Mujeres en Marruecos: Un análisis desde el parentesco y el género. Barcelona: Edicions Bellaterra.
  • Al-Yousuf, H. (2006). Negotiating faith and identity in Muslim-Christian marriages in Britain. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations, 17 (3), 317-329.
  • Alon, I. (1997). Bargaining with God. Le Muséon, 110 (1-2), 223-247.
  • Anderson, J. W. (2003). New media, new publics reconfiguring the public sphere of Islam. Social Research, 70 (3), 887-906.
  • Badran, M. (1985). Islam, patriarchy, and feminism in the Middle East. Trends in History, 4 (1), 49-71.
  • Badran, M. (2006). Islamic feminism revisited. Al-Akhram Weekly, 781, s. p.
  • Badran, M. (2010). Où en est le feminism islamique?. Critique Internationale, 46, 25-44.
  • Bartkowsky, J. P. y Read, J. G. (2000). To veil or not to veil?: A case study of identity negotiation among muslim women in Austin, Texas. Gender and Society, 14 (3), 395-417.
  • Beechey, V. (1979). On Patriarchy. Feminist Review, 3, 66-82.
  • Caldwell, J. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. Londres: Academic Press.
  • Dwyer, C. (1999). Veiled meanings: Young British muslim women and the negotiation of differences. Gender, Place and Culture, 6 (1), 5-26.
  • Eickelman, D. F. y Anderson, J. W. (2003). New Media in the Muslim World: The Emerging Public Sphere. Bloomington: Indiana Series in Middle East Studies.
  • Esposito, J. L. y Burgat, F. (2003). Modernizing Islam: Religion in the public sphere in Europe and the Middle East. Londres: Hurst.
  • Gottfried, H. (1998). Beyond Patriarchy: Theorizing Gender and Class. Sociology, 32 (3), 451-468.
  • Graham, M. y Khosravi, S. (2002). Reordering public and private in Iranian cyberspace: identity, politics and mobilization. Identities: Global Studies in Power and Culture, 9 (2), 219-246.
  • Haghighat, E. (2005). A Comparative Analysis of Neopatriarchy and Female Labor Force Participation in Islamic Countries. Electronic Journal of Sociology. <http://www.sociology.org/content/2005/tier1/__islamLaborforce.pdf>
  • Hassan, R. (1991). Muslim women and post-patriarchal Islam. En: Cooey, P. M.; Eakin, W. R. y McDaniel, J. B. (eds.). After Patriarchy. Feminist Theory of the World Religions. Maryknoll, Nueva York: Orbis Books.
  • Hassan, R. (2001). Challenging the stereotypes of fundamentalism: An Islamic feminist perspective. The Muslim World, 91 (1-2), 55-70.
  • Hatem, M. (1986a). The enduring alliance of Nationalism and Patriarchy: The case of Modern Egypt. Feminist Issues, 6 (1), 20-43.
  • Hatem, M. (1986b). The politics of sexuality and gender in segregated patriarchal systems: The case of 18th and 19th century Egypt. Feminist Studies, 12, 251-274.
  • Hatem, M. (1987). Class and patriarchy as competing paradigms for the study of Middle Eastern women. Comparative Studies on Society and History, 29 (4), 811-818.
  • Hefner, R. W. (2001). Public Islam and the problem of democratization. Sociology of Religion, 62 (4), 491-514.
  • Hutson, A. S. (2001). Women, men and patriarchal bargaining in an Islamic sufiorder: The Tijaniyya in Kano, Nigeria, 1937 to the present. Gender and Society, 15 (5), 734-753.
  • Joseph, S. (1993). Connectivity and patriarchy among urban working class families en Lebanon. Ethos, 21 (4).
  • Joseph, S. (1994). Brother/sister relationships: Connectivity, love and power in the reproduction of Arab patriarchy. American Ethnologist, 21 (1), 50-73.
  • Joseph, S. (1996). Patriarchy and development in the Arab world. Gender and Development, 4 (2), 14-19.
  • Joseph, S. (1997). The public/private: The imagined boundary in the imagined nation/state community: The Lebanese case. Feminist Review, 57, 73-92.
  • Joseph, S. (2001). Gender and Citizenship in the Middle East. Nueva York, Syracuse: University Press.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1985). Women in rural production systems: Products and policies. París: UNESCO.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2 (3), 274-290.
  • Khan, S. (2002). Aversion and desire: Negotiating muslim female identity in the Diaspora. Toronto: Women’s Press.
  • Knauss, P. S. (1987). The persistence of patriarchy: Class, gender and ideology in twentieth century Algeria. New York: Praeger publishers.
  • Lentin, R. (1995). I’ll be a post-feminist in post-patriarchy: Reflexivity is a feminist issue [en línea]. Dublín: Department of Sociology. Trinity College. <http://ireland.iol.ie/~mazzoldi/toolsforchange/postmet/feminist.html>.
  • Lorber, J. y Bandlamundi, L. (1993). The dynamics of marital bargaining in male infertility. Gender and Society, 7 (1), 32-49.
  • Moghadam, V. M. (2004). Patriarchy in transition: women and the changing family in the Middle East. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35 (2), 137-162.
  • Moghadam, V. M. (2002). Islamic feminism and its descontents: toward a resolution of the debate. Signs, 27 (4), 1135-1171.
  • Pollert, A. (1996). Gender and class revisited; or, the poverty of “Patriarchy”. Sociology, 30 (4), 639-659.
  • Rosen, L. (1984). Bargaining for reality: The construction of social relations in a Muslim community. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Safi, O. (2000). Bargaining with baraka: Persian Sufism, “Mysticism”, and Premodern politics. The Muslim World, 90, 259-287.
  • Salvatore, A. y Eickelman, D. F. (2004). Public Islam and the common good. Leiden: Brill Publishers.
  • Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1992). But She Said: Feminist Practices of Biblical Interpretation. Boston: Beacon.
  • Schwenken, H. y Ullrich, C. (2003). We’ll be post-feminists in post-patriarchy: Doing feminism between theoretical concepts and political strategies. Comunicación presentada en la Workshop Feminist politics in the 21st century. Theoretical concepts, Political strategies. Universidad de Dortmund, 4 de junio.
  • Shaheed, F. (1994). Controlled or autonomous: Identity and the experience of the network, Women living under muslim laws. Signs, 19 (4), 997-1019.
  • Sharabi, H. (1988). Neopatriarchy: A theory of distorted change in Arab society. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shibles, W. (1991). The myth of patriarchy. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 25, 305-318.
  • Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23 (2), 213-234.
  • Yount, K. M. (2005). Women’s family power and gender preference in Minya, Egypt. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 (2), 410-428.