Meritocracia

  1. Moreno del Río , Carmelo
Journal:
Eunomía: Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad

ISSN: 2253-6655

Year of publication: 2023

Issue: 25

Pages: 242-261

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20318/EUNOMIA.2023.7999 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Eunomía: Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad

Abstract

Desert is an increasingly valued attribute, in such a way that meritocracy has become a strong valid political device to order resources, incentives and social positions. At the same time, meritocratic logic challenges the idea of a fair democracy, based on non-discriminatory equality towards different people. It is worth asking if meritocracy and democracy can be complementary powers or, on the contrary, obey incompatible logics. The objective of this paper is to analyze the relationship between desert and an idea of just democracy. For doing so, this text is organized in several parts. The first one analyzes what desert consists in, based on the work of David Miller. The second part analyzes the arguments of three types of theoretical authors –liberals, communitarians and democratic egalitarians– who have debated this issue. The text concludes with some reflections on how it would be possible to facilitate that meritocracy can be subordinated to democratic values.

Bibliographic References

  • Avaro, D. (2014). Democracias e institucionalización del sorteo: ¿es posible pensar en su complementariedad. Las Torres de Lucca. Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política, 5, pp. 25-56.
  • Beach, J. M. (2021). The Myths of Measurement and Meritocracy. Why Accountability Metrics in Higher Education are Unfair and Increase Inequality. Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Bradbury, A. (2021). Ability, Inequality and Post-pandemic Schools: Rethinking Contemporary Myths of Meritocracy. Bristol University Press.
  • Brennan, J. (2016). Against democracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Brigati, R. (2014). Desert as a Principle of Distributive Justice: A Reconsideration. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 40 (7), 705-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714536434
  • Brighouse, H. y Swift, A. (2006). Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods, Ethics, 116 (3), pp. 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1086/500524
  • Daniels, N. (1978). Merit and Meritocracy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 7 (3), 206-233.
  • Feinberg, J. (1999[1963]). Justice and personal desert. En L. Pojman y O. McLeod (Eds.), What do we deserve? A reader on justice and desert (70-83). Oxford University Press.
  • Feldman, F. y Skow, B. (2020). Desert. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
  • Frank, R. H. (2016). Success and Luck. Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy. Princeton University Press.
  • Ganuza, E. y Mendiharat, A. (2020). La democracia es posible. Sorteo cívico y deliberación para rescatar el poder de la democracia, Consonni.
  • García Cívico, J. (2021). De Michael Sandel a César Rendueles: ¿es posible criticar la meritocracia en nombre del bien común? Isegoría. Revista De Filosofía Moral y Política, 65, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2021.65.12
  • Gil-Hernández, C. (2020). Cracking meritocracy from the starting gate: Social inequality in skill formation and school choice. [Tesis doctoral, European University Institute]. https://doi.org/10.2870/794536
  • Hayek, F. A. (1991[1960]). Los fundamentos de la libertad. Unión Editorial.
  • Honneth, A. (2007[2005]). Reificación. Un estudio de la teoría del reconocimiento. Katz.
  • Kleinig, J. (1999 [1971]). The concept of desert. En L. Pojman y O. McLeod (Eds.), What do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (84-92). Oxford University Press.
  • Lamont, J. (1994). The concept of Desert in Distributive Justice. The Philosophical Quarterly, 44 (174), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2220146
  • Lee, S. (2022). The contradiction of the concept of desert and distributive justice (artículo original en chino). The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 21, 13 (2), 431-446.
  • Lister, A. (2022). Theology, Desert, and Egalitarianism. The Journal of Politics, 84 (3), 1528-1538. https://doi.org/10.1086/717186
  • Littler, J. (2018). Against meritocracy. Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility. Routledge.
  • Liu, A. (2011). Unraveling the Myth of Meritocracy within the control of US Higher Education. Higher Education, 62, 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9394-7
  • Lizárraga, F. (2019). Igualitarismo y meritocracia: De Rawls a Scanlon. Páginas de Filosofía, 23, 7-32.
  • Markovits, D. (2019). The Meritocracy Trap: How America’s Foundational Math Feeds Inequality, Desmantles the middle class and Devours the elite. Penguin Publishing Group.
  • McCrory, J., Horn, I. y Chen, G. (2022). “You need to be more responsible”. The Myth of Meritocracy and Theacher´s Account of Homework Inequalities. Educational Researcher, 20 (10), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X221111337
  • McLeod, O. (1999). Desert and institutions. En L. Pojman, y O. McLeod (Eds.), What do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (186-195). Oxford University Press.
  • McLeod, O. (2008). Desert. En E.N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press.
  • Mijs, J. B. (2018). Visualizing belief in meritocracy, 1930-2010. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118811805
  • Miller, D. (1998). Desert and merit. En E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. vol. III. Routledge.
  • Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge University Press.
  • Miller, D. (2021). Sidgwick and Rawls on distributive justice and desert. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 20 (4), 385-408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X211036088
  • Moreno Pestaña, J. L. (2017). Los desafíos del sorteo a la democracia, los desafíos de la democracia al sorteo. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 72, 7-21. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/303241
  • Mulligan, T. (2018). Justice and the Meritocratic State. Routledge.
  • Olsaretti, S. (2003). Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press.
  • Olsaretti, S. (2003). Introduction. Debating Desert and Justice. En S. Olsaretti (Ed.), Desert and justice (1-24). Oxford University Press.
  • Pojman, L. (1999). Does Equality Trump Desert?. En L. Pojman y O. McLeod (Eds.), What do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (283-297). Oxford University Press.
  • Pojman, L. y McLeod, O. (1999). What do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert. Oxford University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1995 [1971]). Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Rendueles, C. (2020). Contra la igualdad de oportunidades. Un panfleto igualitarista. Seix Barral.
  • Rhode, D. (2021). Myths of Meritocracy. Comment on M. Sandel´s the Tyranny of Merit. American Journal of Law and Equility, 1, 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1162/ajle_a_00008
  • Sadurski, W. (1985). Giving Desert its Due. Social Justice and Legal Theory. Springer & Reidel Publishing Company.
  • Sandel, M. (2021 [2020]). La tiranía del mérito. ¿Qué ha sido del bien común? Debate.
  • Scanlon, T. M. (2018). Why does Inequality Matter? Oxford University Press.
  • Scheffler, S. (1999 [1992]). Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics. En L. Pojman, y O. McLeod (Eds.), What do We Deserve? A Reader on Justice and Desert (196-209). Oxford University Press.
  • Scheffler, S. (2000). Justice and Desert in Liberal Theory. California Law Review, 88 (3), 965-990. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481202
  • Scheffler, S. (2005). Choice, Circumstance, and the Value of Equality. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 4 (1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05049434
  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Merit and Justice. En K. Arrow, S. Bowles y S.N. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, (5-16). Princeton University Press.
  • Sher, G. (1987). Desert. Princeton University Press.
  • Souroujon, G. (2021). Las trampas de la meritocracia. Un recorrido por los problemas más significativos que esconde el merecimiento. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 191, 59-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.191.03
  • Van Dijk, H., Kooij, D., Karanika-Murray, M., De Vos, A. y Meyer, B. (2020). Meritocracy a Myth? A Multilevel Perspective of How Social Inequality Accumulates Through Work. Organizational Phychology Review, 10 (3-4), 240-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620930063
  • Van Platz, J. (2022). The Principle of Merit and The Capital-Labour Split. Economics and Philosophy, 38, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000450
  • Vélez, F. (2018). ¿Meritocracia? ¿Para quiénes? Isonomía: Revista de Teoría y Filosofía del Derecho, 48, 147-167. https://doi.org/10.5347/48.2018.40
  • Vélez, F. (2023). Meritocracia. En C. Pereda (Ed.), Diccionario de injusticias. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Walzer, M. (1993 [1983]). Esferas de justicia. Una defensa del pluralismo y la igualdad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Walzer, M. (2010 [2003]). Estados unidos en el mundo: Guerras justas y sociedades justas. Una entrevista con Michael Walzer. En M. Walzer (Ed.), Pensar políticamente (407-425). Paidós.
  • Young, M. (1996 [1958]). The Rise of Meritocracy. Transaction Publishers.
  • Young, I. M. (2000 [1990]). La justicia y la política de la diferencia. Cátedra.
Data source: Dialnet