Communications skills and ESP coursesa Basque experience

Referencias bibliográficas

• Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
• Benson, P. (2003). Learner autonomy in the classroom. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 289-308). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
• C. J. Brumfit & Johnson, K. (Eds.) (1989). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Burns, A. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1998). Motivating students to engage in experiential learning: a tension-to-learn theory. Simulation and Gaming, 29, 133-151.
• Castro, J., Ibañez, C. & González, J. M. (1991). Interdisciplinary collaboration. The ideal way out in LSP teaching: the fruits of the Bilbao experience. In M. McGinity, R. Alejo & S. Gómez (Eds.), Lenguas aplicadas a las ciencias y a la tecnología (pp. 38-43). Badajoz: Universidad de Extremadura y Universidade de Evora.
• Coll, C. (2003). El currículo universitario en el siglo XXI. In C. Moreneo & J. L. Poso (Eds.), La universidad ante la nueva cultura educativa. Enseñar y aprender para la autonomía (pp. 271-284). Madrid: Síntesis.
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3; from theory to classroom practice. Dublin: Authentik.
• Davies, J. (2001). Communication skills: A guide for engineering and applied science students. Essex: Pearson (Prentice Hall).
• Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Epstein, M. (1999). Teaching field-specific writing: Results of a WAC survey. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 29-41.
• Esposito, E. & Sigler, E. (2001). Acquiring the tools to become a successful engineer in the 21st century: Aptitudes and attitudes. In D. Weichert, B. Rauhut & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Educating the engineer for the 21st century (pp. 221- 228). The Nederlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed; multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• González Ardeo, J. M. (2002). Project Work interdisciplinar en un curso de ESP. XI Conferencia Internacional Lingüístico Literaria (pp. 195-203). Santiago de Cuba (Cuba): Universidad de Oriente.
• Goñi, J. M. (2005). El espacio europeo de educación superior, un reto para la universidad. Barcelona: Octaedro/ICE-UB.
• Grünwald, N. & Krause, R. (2007). The role of the European Union in fostering entrepreneurship education. Proceedings 10th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 53-58). Bangkok (Thailand).
• Hill, M. & Storey, A. (2003). SpeakEasy: online support for oral presentation skills. ELT Journal, 57(4), 370-376.
• Hutchinson, T. & Sawyer-Laucanno, C. (1990). Science and technology: specific purpose language training. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 135-141). New York, NY: Newbury House.
• Keane, A. & Gibson, I. S. (1999). Communication trends in engineering firms: implications for undergraduate engineering courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 15(2), 115-121.
• Littlewood, W. (1992). Teaching oral communication: A methodological framework. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Kmiec, D. M. (2004). Teaching engineering communication: a novel verticallyintegrated and discipline-conscious curriculum. http://www.stc.org/ConfProceed/2004/PDFs/0039.pdf
• Maier, H. R. (2007). Meeting the challenges of engineering education via online roleplay simulations. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 13(1), 31-39.
• Monge Benito, S. (2008). La escuela vasca ante el cambio tecnológico (1999-2004). Tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en la enseñanza. Leioa, Bizkaia: Servicio Editorial UPV-EHU.
• Mora Ruiz, J. G. (2003). Competencias y empleo de los jóvenes graduados universitarios. Revista de Educación, 330, 157-170.
• Prince, R. (2006). Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 321-326.
• Ravensteijn, W., Graaff, E. & Kroesen, O. (2006). Engineering the future: the social necessity of communicative engineers. European Journal of Engineerng Education, 31, 63-71.
• Riemer, M. J. (2007). Communication skills for the 21st century engineer. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 11(1), 89-101.
• Sageev, P. & Romanowski, C. J. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 685-92.
• Sweeney, S. (1997). English for Business Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Tedford, J. D., Seidel, R. H. A. & Islam, M. A. (2007). Teamwork and its influence on learning in industry-based projects. Proceedings 10th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education (pp. 203-206). Bangkok (Thailand).
• Trebbi, T. (2003). Curriculum development and learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: constraints and possibilities. In D. Little, J. Ridley & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: Teacher, learner and assessment (pp. 61-78). Dublin: Authentik.
• van Esch, K. & St.John, O. (2003). A framework for freedom: Learner autonomy in foreign language teacher education. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Wilder, C. & Rotondo, J. (2002). Point, Click & Wow! A quick guide to brilliant laptop presentations. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.