Ikerketa-ekintzaren bitartez ebaluazio hezigarria egiteko prozesu bat sortzen Lehen Hezkuntzan

  1. Amenabarro , Esti
  2. Intxausti , Nahia
  3. Bereziartua , Justo
Journal:
Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

ISSN: 0214-9753

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 34

Issue: 2

Pages: 29-55

Type: Article

DOI: 10.1387/TANTAK.23901 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

Abstract

The research work we present aims to review and improve the practices established in the evaluation system of students in a public school of Primary Education of the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, reflecting on proposals for educational improvement. A research and action process is carried out involving ten professors and five external advisers related to the University and the educational administration. The results reflect the most relevant issues addressed in the group debates, together with the decisions that affect the practice of evaluation in the classrooms: evaluation objectives, importance of information collection and time of evaluation action. It also describes new tools designed to facilitate the collection of information in order to perform a more developed and continuous learning assessment. The evaluation of continuing education requires specific instruments adapted to the curricular design. The mode of action research has allowed the development of a joint and consensual evaluation tool.

Bibliographic References

  • Adams, m. E., Bell, L. A. E., eta Griffin, P. E. (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice. Routledge/Taylor eta Francis Group.
  • Allal, L. (2020). Assessment and the co-regulation of learning in the classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 332-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2019.1609411
  • Andrade, H. L., eta Heritage, m. (2017). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge.
  • Barnes, N., Fives, H. eta Dacey, c. m. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs about assessment. In H. Fives eta m. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on tea-chers’ beliefs (pp. 284-300). Routledge.
  • Black, P.J., Harrison, c., Lee, c., marshall, B. eta Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learninig: Putting it into practice. Open University Press.
  • Bonner, s. m. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions about assessment: competing narra-tives. In G. Brown, L. Harris (Eds.).Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 37-55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315749136
  • Brown, G. T. L., eta Remesal, A. (2017). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: comparing two inventories with Ecuadorian teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 68-74. https://doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.07.003
  • Cantón, I. eta Pino-Juste, m. (2011). Diseño y desarrollo del currículum. Alianza.
  • Castillo, S. (1994). Diagnóstico-evaluación: cooperación y complementariedad. Revista de investigación educativa, 23 640-642.
  • Castillo, S. (coord.) (2002). Compromisos de la evaluación educativa. Prentice Hall.
  • Colás Buendía, m. P. eta Hernández Pina, F. (2009). Competencias científicas para la realización de una tesis doctoral. Davinci.
  • Coll, c. (1991). Psicología y curriculum. Paidós.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  • Eilks, I., eta Markic, S. (2011). Effects of a Long-Term Participatory Action Re-search Project on science Teachers’ Professional Development. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75196
  • Elliot, J. (1981). Action research: A framework for self-evaluation in schools.cambridge Institute of Education.Elliot, J. (1997). La investigación acción en educación. Morata.
  • Gairín, J. (2009). Usos y abusos en la evaluación como autorregulación. En J. Gairín y P. Díez (Eds.), Nuevas funciones de la evaluación (pp.11-44). ministerio de Educación cultura y Deporte, subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones
  • Gárate A., Ortega, P. (2015). Educar desde la precariedad: la otra educación posible. Ápeiron.
  • Hackman, H. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity eta Excellence in Education, 38(2), 103-109. hhtp:// doi.org/ 10.1080/10665680590935034
  • Hargreaves, A., eta O’connor, m. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. corwin Press.
  • Harris, A. (2020). System Leaders and System Leadership: Reviewing the Evi-dence. National Academy for Educational Leadership Wales. swansea Uni-versity school of Education. https://nael.cymru/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/system-Leaders-and-system-Leadership.pdf
  • Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. 77 (1), 81-112. hhtp:// doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
  • Hidalgo, N., murillo, F. J. (2017). Las concepciones sobre el proceso de evalua-ción del aprendizaje de los estudiantes. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación, 15(1), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2017.15.1.007
  • McKernan, J. (1999). Investigacción-acción y curriculum. morata.mcNiff, J., Lomax, P., eta Whitehead, J. (1996). you and your action research Project. Hyde Publications.
  • Montanero, m. (2019). Didáctica general. Planificación y práctica de la enseñanza primaria. Universidad de Extremadura.
  • Monteiro, V., mata, L., eta Santos, N. N. (2021). Assessment conceptions and Practices: Perspectives of Primary school Teachers and students. In Frontiers in Education (6), pp. 1-15. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185
  • Moreno, B., Ramos, c., eta Salomé, A. (2017). Efectos de las estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje universitarias en el rendimiento académico. Revista d’Innovació Docent Universitària, 9, 39-53. http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/RIDU/article/ viewFile/RIDU2017.9.4/20378
  • Muskin, J. A. (2015). Continuous Assessment for Improved Teaching and Lear-ning: A Critical Review to Inform Policy and Practice. Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum, Learning and Assessment, 1.
  • OIE-UNESCO.OECD. (2020). Global Teaching InSights. OEcD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/20d6f36b
  • Orakcı, Ş. (2021). Teachers’ reflection and level of reflective thinking on the di-fferent dimensions of their teaching practice. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 5(1), 118-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.51383/ijonmes.2021.88
  • Padilla, m.T. (2002). Técnicas e instrumentos para el diagnóstico y la evaluación educativa. CCS.
  • Pérez-Juste, R. (1994). ¿Por qué diferenciar los términos evaluación y diagnóstico? Revista de investigación educativa, 23, 588-591.
  • Perrenaud, P. (2008). Diez nuevas competencias para enseñar. Graó.
  • Philipp, R. (2007). mathematics teachers’beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Information Age Publishing.
  • Polo. I. (2011). Los criterios de evaluación como detonante de la programación didáctica. Avances en supervisión educativa, 14, 1-11. https://avances.adide.org/index.php/ase/article/view/482
  • Pratt, D. D. (1992). conceptions of teaching. Adult education quarterly, 42(4), 203-220. https://doi-org.ehu.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/074171369204200401
  • Prieto, M., Contreras, G. (2008). Las concepciones que orientan las prácticas evaluativas de los profesores: un problema a develar. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 34(2), 245-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-07052008000200015
  • Samiullah, M. I., Anjum, A. (2017). Effect of continuous Assessment Techniques on students’ Performance at Elementary level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 39(1), 91-100. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/PDF-FILEs/7_39_1_17.pdf
  • Sanmartí, N. (2007). Evaluar para aprender. Graó.
  • Schander, C., Massa, A.A. (2020). criterios de evaluación: construyendo fiabilidad y objetividad. Anuario Digital de Investigación Educativa, 2, 329-341.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L., Coryn, c. L. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applica-tions. John Wiley eta sons.
  • Van Manen, M. (2015). Pedagogical Tact Knowing What to Do When you Don’t Know What to Do. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315422855
  • Woolfolk Hoy, Hoy, K., eta Davis, H. (2009). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. In K. R. Wenzel eta A. Wigfield (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook se-ries. Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 627-653). Routledge/Taylor eta Francis Group
Data source: Dialnet