Is relevance theory asocial?

  1. Jary, Mark
Revista:
Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI
  1. Mateo Martínez, José (coord.)
  2. Yus Ramos, Francisco (coord.)

ISSN: 0214-4808 2171-861X

Año de publicación: 1998

Título del ejemplar: Relevance theory

Número: 11

Páginas: 157-170

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.14198/RAEI.1998.11.12 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openRUA editor

Otras publicaciones en: Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses: RAEI

Resumen

This paper challenges the view that Sperber & Wilson's Relevance Theory is intrinsically asocial. To this effect, it is firstly shown how Relevance Theory provides a more satisfactory explanation of the "politeness" of imperative sentences than Brown & Levinson's treatment. Secondly' supposed examples of the theory's inability to explain socially motivated instances of language use presented by O'Neill are examined and shown to be well within its explanatory power. Finally, a more general argument is presented. Recent insights from evolutionary psychology are drawn on in order to demonstrate how Sperber & Wilson's account of the way humans interpret utterances is able to accommodate a social dimension.