Is the Impact of Sustainability Exploration on Firm Economic Return so Obvious? The Case of Internationalized Spanish Firms Operating in High-Tech and Low-Tech Industries

  1. Castillo-Apraiz, Julen 12
  2. Palma-Ruiz, Jesús Manuel
  3. Arzubiaga, Unai 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico
Libro:
Entrepreneurship as Practice

Editorial: Springer

ISBN: 9789811948183,  9789811948190

Año de publicación: 2022

Páginas: 99-108

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-4819-0_7 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

This study aims to help to bridge the innovation and sustainability literature by assessing the impact of sustainability exploration on the economic return of internationalized Spanish firms. We apply partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to data from a sample of 156 internationalized Spanish firms. The results suggest that sustainability exploration by itself does not have a positive impact on economic return, which suggests that integration between sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation might be the key to achieve the potential of sustainable innovation fully. In this line, the impact of sustainability exploration on economic return is not more significant for firms operating in high-technology industries compared to those operating in low-technology industries, which sheds some light into the debate on trade-offs in corporate sustainability.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 105–149.
  • Bartos, P. J. (2007). Is mining a high-tech industry?: Investigations into innovation and productivity advance. Resources Policy, 32(4), 149–158.
  • Baumgartner, R. J., & Rauter, R. (2017). Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140(1), 81–92.
  • Bhattacharya, C. B., & Polman, P. (2016). Sustainability Lessons From the Front Lines. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(2), 71–78.
  • Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2018). Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India. Management Decision, 56(8), 1734–1747.
  • Brettel, M., & Rottenberger, J. D. (2013). Examining the link between entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 471–490.
  • Chai, K. H., Yap, C. M., & Wang, X. (2011). Network closure’s impact on firms’ competitive advantage: The mediating roles of knowledge processes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 28(1–2), 2–22.
  • Chan, S. H., Martin, J. D., & Kensinger, J. W. (1990). Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics, 26(2), 255–276.
  • Cui, A. P., Walsh, M. F., & Zou, S. (2014). The importance of strategic fit between host–home country similarity and exploration-exploitation strategies on small and medium-sized enterprises’ performance: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 22(4), 67–85.
  • Delmas, M. A., & Pekovic, S. (2018). Corporate sustainable innovation and employee behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(4), 1071–1088.
  • Edwards, M. G. (2009). An integrative metatheory for organisational learning and sustainability in turbulent times. The Learning Organization, 16(3), 189–207.
  • Faucheux, S., & Nicolaï, I. (2011). IT for green and green IT: A proposed typology of eco-innovation. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 2020–2027.
  • Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61, 2549–2568.
  • Gianni, M., Gotzamani, K., & Tsiotras, G. (2017). Multiple perspectives on integrated management systems and corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 1297–1311.
  • Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463–487.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Castillo-Apraiz, J., Cepeda, G., & Roldán, J. L. (2019). Manual de Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Omnia Science Publisher.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2012a). Editorial-Partial Least Squares: The Better Approach to Structural Equation Modeling? Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 312–319.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012b). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5), 320–340.
  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012c). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.
  • Heidenreich, M. (2009). Innovation patterns and location of European low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 483–494.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20(1), 277–319.
  • Hernández-Vivanco, A., Bernardo, M., & Cruz-Cázarez, C. (2018). Sustainable innovation through management systems integration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1176–1187.
  • Jones, M. V. (1999). The internationalization of small high-technology firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7(4), 15–41.
  • Kennedy, S., Whiteman, G., & van den Ende, J. (2017). Radical Innovation for Sustainability: The Power of Strategy and Open Innovation. Long Range Planning, 50(6), 712–725.
  • Koo, C., Chung, N., & Ryoo, S. Y. (2014). How does ecological responsibility affect manufacturing firms’ environmental and economic performance? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9/10), 1171–1189.
  • Kuokkanen, A., Uusitalo, V., & Koistinen, K. (2019). A framework of disruptive sustainable innovation: An example of the Finnish food system. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(7), 749–764.
  • Kyläheiko, K., Jantunen, A., Puumalainen, K., Saarenketo, S., & Tuppura, A. (2011). Innovation and internationalization as growth strategies: The role of technological capabilities and appropriability. International Business Review, 20(5), 508–520.
  • Laforet, S. (2009). Effects of size, market, and strategic orientation on innovation in non-high-tech manufacturing SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 43(1/2), 188–212.
  • Landrum, N. E. (2018). Stages of corporate sustainability: Integrating the strong sustainability worldview. Organization & Environment, 31(4), 287–313.
  • Landrum, N. E., & Ohsowski, B. (2018). Identifying worldviews on corporate sustainability: A content analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(1), 128–151.
  • Law, K. M. Y., Lau, A. K. W., & Ip, W. H. (2019). What drives success in product innovation? Empirical evidence in high-tech and low-tech manufacturers in China. International Journal of Technology Management, 79(2), 165–198.
  • Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Albort-Morant, G. (2016). Linking Market Orientation, Innovation, and Performance: An Empirical Study on Small Industrial Enterprises in Spain. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 37–50.
  • Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Millán, A. G., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2015). Organizational Unlearning, Innovation Outcomes, and Performance: The moderating effect of firm size. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 803–809.
  • López, M. V., García, A., & Rodríguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Busines Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.
  • Lozano, R. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: An analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 14–26.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišček, B. (2014). Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 182–194.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišček, B. (2015). Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational, economic performance? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3), 184–200.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Dahlgaard, J. J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišček, B. (2016a). Effect of sustainability-oriented innovation practices on the overall organisational performance: An empirical examination. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(9–10), 1171–1190.
  • Maletič, M., Maletič, D., & Gomišček, B. (2016b). The impact of sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation practices on the organisational performance: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 158–169.
  • Meuer, J., Koelbel, J., & Hoffmann, V. H. (2019). On the nature of corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 00, 1–23.
  • Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
  • Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, L. (2008). Social responsibility in Spain: Practices and motivations in firms. Management Decision, 46(8), 1247–1271.
  • Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597.
  • Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as an analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6), 598–605.
  • Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., and Becker, J.-M. (2015). Smartpls 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS.
  • Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457.
  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222–237.
  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2017). Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability: Capturing the relationship between sustainability performance, business competitiveness, and economic performance. In S. Schaltegger & M. Wagner (Eds.), Managing the business case for sustainability: The integration of social, environmental, and economic performance (pp. 1–27). Routledge.
  • Serrano-Bedia, A. M., López-Fernández, M., & García-Piqueres, G. (2012). Complementarity between innovation activities and innovation performance: Evidence from Spanish innovative firms. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(5), 557–577.
  • Sok, P., & O’Cass, A. (2015). Examining the new product innovation–performance relationship: Optimizing the role of individual-level creativity and attention-to-detail. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 156–165.
  • Van Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292–312.
  • Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134.
  • Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560.
  • Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5), 557–572.
  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.
  • Xavier, A. F., Naveiro, R. M., Aoussat, A., & Reyes, T. (2017). Systematic literature review of eco-innovation models: Opportunities and recommendations for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 1278–1302.
  • Yu, W., Minniti, M., & Nason, R. (2019). Underperformance duration and innovative search: Evidence from the high-tech manufacturing industry. Strategic Management Journal, 40(5), 836–861.