Corrective Feedback in Second versus Foreign Language Contexts

  1. Mayo, Maria del Pilar García
  2. Milla, Ruth
Libro:
The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching

Año de publicación: 2021

Páginas: 473-493

Tipo: Capítulo de Libro

DOI: 10.1017/9781108589789.023 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Resumen

This chapter summarizes the main findings regarding the effect of the variable instructional context on oral corrective feedback (CF) provision and learner uptake in second language (SL) and foreign language (FL) settings. Although there are other intervening variables in CF provision, such as learners’ individual variables, CF type, and task-related factors, instructional context seems to play an important role in the way teachers provide CF to oral errors, as well as in learners’ reaction to those errors. Lesson orientation appears to be a key factor and, thus, in those contexts that teachers, learners, and activities focus on language forms, such as FL settings, CF seems to be more effective, especially recasts. In classrooms that are more meaning- or content-oriented, such as SL, immersion or secondary school content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms, the rates of uptake are lower and more explicit CF types (such as metalinguistic information or elicitation) are needed. This review of the impact of context on CF provision and uptake leads to some pedagogical implications

Referencias bibliográficas

  • 10.1111/lang.12020
  • 10.1017/S0272263112000708
  • Mackey, (2007), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition, pp. 407
  • 10.1075/lllt.18
  • 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x
  • 10.6018/ijes/14/1/151841
  • Amrhein, (2010), Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, pp. 95
  • 10.1075/lllt.45.03fuj
  • 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
  • 10.4324/9781315621432-3
  • 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x
  • 10.1177/0033688212463274
  • 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x
  • 10.1093/elt/ccp082
  • Spada, (1995), COLT. Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications
  • 10.1057/9780230302297
  • Vygotsky, (1978), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
  • Milla, R. (2017). Corrective feedback episodes in CLIL and EFL classrooms: Teachers’ and learners’ beliefs and classroom behaviour. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Vitoria, Spain.
  • 10.2167/la429.0
  • 10.4324/9781315621432-11
  • 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12060.x
  • 10.1075/eurosla.14.05mif
  • 10.1017/S0272263197001034
  • 10.1111/1467-9922.00156
  • 10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.3.2
  • 10.1177/1362168816644940
  • 10.1016/j.system.2011.10.014
  • 10.1017/S0272263100004010
  • Dabaghi, (2009), System, 37, pp. 82, 10.1016/j.system.2008.04.004
  • 10.4324/9780203850961
  • 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00716.x
  • 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x
  • 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x
  • 10.1093/applin/amp041
  • 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00005-3
  • 10.1017/S0267190511000092
  • Lochtman, (2007), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse, pp. 119
  • 10.1017/S0272263103000044
  • 10.1017/S0272263109990520
  • Havranek, (2001), EUROSLA Yearbook, 1, pp. 99
  • 10.1191/1362168804lr146oa
  • 10.1075/lllt.23.12sol
  • Samar, (2009), Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 212, pp. 107
  • 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00427.x
  • 10.1017/S0272263106060141
  • 10.1017/S0272263112000149
  • Nassaji, (2019), (Doing) SLA research with implications for the classroom (reconciling methodological demands and pedagogical applicability) (pp. 107–126)
  • 10.1017/S0272263104263021
  • 10.1080/09658410208667045
  • 10.1080/09658416.2011.639884
  • 10.2167/beb462.0
  • 10.2307/3588241
  • Lee, (2013), System, 41, pp. 217, 10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
  • 10.1080/09571736.2014.891370
  • 10.4324/9781351190558
  • 10.1017/S0272263109990519
  • 10.1177/1362168813519373
  • 10.1080/09571736.2014.889509
  • 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.470
  • 10.1017/S0272263106060128
  • Enever, (2018), Policy and politics in global primary English
  • Nassaji, (2017), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning. Research, theory, applications, implications
  • 10.1017/S027226319800103X
  • 10.2104/aral1026
  • García Mayo, (2017), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights
  • 10.1191/1362168806lr203oa
  • Muñoz, C. (2007). CLIL: Some thoughts on its psycholinguistic principles. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada (Models and practice in CLIL) Vol. Extra 1, 17–26.
  • 10.37546/JALTJJ24.1-3