Validez del cuestionario de calidad de vida SF-36 como indicador de resultados de procedimientos médicos y quirúrgicos

  1. Ruiz de Velasco, Ibone 1
  2. Quintana López, José María 1
  3. Padierna Acero, Jesús Angel 1
  4. Arostegui Madariaga, Inmaculada 2
  5. Pérez Izquierdo, Julio 1
  6. Ojanguren Bergaz, Jesús Maria 1
  7. Anitua, Cecilia
  8. González, Nerea 1
  9. Etxeberría, Yarima 1
  1. 1 Hospital de Galdakao - Usansolo
    info

    Hospital de Galdakao - Usansolo

    Galdácano, España

    ROR https://ror.org/025714n80

  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Revista de calidad asistencial

ISSN: 1134-282X

Año de publicación: 2002

Volumen: 17

Número: 4

Páginas: 206-212

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/S1134-282X(02)77506-4 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de calidad asistencial

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Objective To study the usefulness of a generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, the SF-36. Method A descriptive study was performed in 691 patients with different clinical problems recruited from the outpatient departments of a general hospital. The diagnostic groups selected were lung and hematological cancer, hip osteoarthritis, eating disorders and chronic inflammatory bowel disease (CIBD). Recruited patients were asked to complete the SF-36, a generic HRQoL questionnaire. A follow-up study was performed in patients with hip osteoarthritis before and after total joint hip replacement. Results Patients with eating disorders scored lower in the mental domains, social functioning and physical role. Patients with lung cancer had low values in all HRQoL domains. Their scores were lower in the physical areas, and slightly lower than those in patients with hematological cancer. Patients with hip osteoarthritis showed significant effects in the physical areas, mainly in the bodily pain domain. Improvement after surgery was greater in the physical domains. In patients with CIBD mainly the general health domain was affected. Conclusions The SF-36 was able to discriminate among different clinical problems. These results support its discriminative validity as an indicator for the evaluation of the outcomes of medical procedures among centers and patient groups.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Larson CO, Nelson EC, Gustafson D, Batalden PB. The relationship between meeting patients’ information needs and their satisfaction with hospital care and general health status outcomes. Int J for Qual Health Care 1996;8:447-56.
  • Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:622-9.
  • Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
  • Dellasega C, Orwig D, Ahern F, Lenz E. Postdischarge medication use of elderly cardiac patients from urban and rural locations. Journals of Gerontology 1999. Series A. Biol Sci Med Sci 1999;54:M514-20.
  • Essink-Bot ML, De Koning HJ, Nijs HG, Kirkels WJ, Van der Maas PJ, Schroder FH. Short-term effects of population-based screening for prostate cancer on health-related quality of life. J Nat Cancer Inst 1998;90:925-31.
  • Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104:771-6.
  • Alonso J, Regidor E, Barrio G, Prieto L, Rodriguez C, De la Fuente L. Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-36. Med Clin (Barc) 1998;111:410-6.
  • Anitua C, Quintana JM. Valores poblacionales del índice de salud SF-36 en el País Vasco: importancia y aplicación en la práctica clínica. Osasunkaria 1999;17:10-7.
  • American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. 4th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatry Association, 1994.
  • Ware JE Jr, Snows KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
  • Ware JE, Jr., Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales. A user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
  • Alonso J, Prieto L, Ferrer M, Vilagut G, Broquetas JM, Roca J, et al. Testing the measurement properties of the Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey among male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Quality of Life in COPD Study Group. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:1087-94.
  • Anderson JP, Kaplan RM, Coons SJ, Schneiderman LJ. Comparison of the Quality of Well-being Scale and the SF-36 results among two samples of ill adults: AIDS and other illnesses. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51:755-62.
  • Glassman SD, Dimar JR, Johnson JR, Minkow R. Preoperative SF-36 responses as a predictor of reoperation following lumbar fusion. Orthopedics 1998;21:1201-3.
  • McColl E, Steen IN, Meadows KA, Hutchinson A, Eccles MP, Hewison J, et al. Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care-an application to asthma and diabetes. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1339-48.
  • Lyons RA, Lo SV, Littlepage BN. Comparative health status of patients with 11 common illnesses in Wales. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1994;48:388-90.
  • Schlenk EA, Erlen JA, Dunbar-Jacob J, McDowell J, Engberg S, Sereika SM et al. Health-related quality of life in chronic disorders: a comparison across studies using the MOS SF-36. Qual Life Res 1998;7:57-65.
  • Carod-Artal FJ, Egido-Navarro JA, González-Gutiérrez JL, Varela DSE. Percepción de la sobrecarga a largo plazo en cuidadores de supervivientes de un ictus. Rev Neurol 1999;28:1130-8.
  • Láinez Andrés JM. Migraña y calidad de vida. Neurología 1998;13(Supl 2):1-8.
  • Permanyer MG, Brotons CC, Ribera SA, Cascant CP, Moral PI, Pons JM, et al. Desigual perfil clínico, calidad de vida y mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes operados de injerto aortocoronario en centros públicos y privados de Cataluña. El estudio CIRCORCA. Rev Esp Cardiol 1998;51:806-15.
  • Mira JJ, Rodríguez Marín J, Tirado S, Sitges E. Semejanzas y diferencias entre la satisfacción y calidad percibida. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2000;15:36-42.
  • Candlish P, Watts P, Redman S, Whyte P, Lowe J. Elderly patients with heart failure: a study of satisfaction with care and quality of life. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:141-6.
  • Hall JA, Milburn MA, Epstein AM. A causal model of health status and satisfaction with medical care. Med Care 1993; 31:84-94.
  • Maiz E. La difusión de resultados y la mejora continua de la asistencia sanitaria. Rev Calidad Asistencial 2001;16:86-9.
  • European Foundation for Quality Management. Modelo EFQM de Excelencia. Club Gestión de Calidad. Madrid, 1999.
  • Grimmer K, Moss J. The development, validity and application of a new instrument to assess the quality of discharge planning activities from the community perspective. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:109-16.
  • Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Samsa GP, Landsman PB. Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:135-40.
  • McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 1994;32:551-67.
  • Pfennings LE, Van der Ploeg HM, Cohen L, Bramsen I, Polman CH, Lankhorst, et al. A health-related quality of life questionnaire for multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;100:148-55.
  • Brazier JE, Harper R, Munro J, Walters SJ, Snaith ML. Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology 1999;38:870-7.
  • Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, Fogg AJ. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 1999;24:1805-12.
  • Holtzman J, Caldwell M, Walvatne C, Kane R. Long-term functional status and quality of life after lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:395-402.
  • Fabio RP, Choi T, Soderberg J, Hansen CR. Health-related quality of life for patients with progressive multiple sclerosis: influence of rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 1997;77:1704-16.
  • Coulehan JL, Schulberg HC, Block MR, Madonia MJ, Rodríguez E. Treating depressed primary care patients improves their physical, mental, and social functioning. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1113-20.
  • Savage P, Ricci MA, Lynn M, Gardner A, Knight S, Brochu M, et al. Effects of home versus supervised exercise for patients with intermittent claudication. J Cardiopulmonary Rehab 2001;21:152-7.
  • Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measurements in clinical trials: choosing the right approach. En: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996; p. 41-8
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet