La anticipación en la búsqueda de una innovación responsablegradientes de radicalidad ético-política

  1. Sergio Urueña 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU
Journal:
Recerca: revista de pensament i analisi

ISSN: 1130-6149

Year of publication: 2022

Issue Title: Ética de la investigación: Configurar marcos para promover buenas prácticas

Issue: 27

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6035/RECERCA.6139 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Recerca: revista de pensament i analisi

Abstract

Anticipation has emerged over the past two decades as a fundamental tool for a wide variety of normative frameworks aimed at promoting a more socio-politically responsible governance of science, technology and innovation. However, theoretical considerations and reflections on the meaning and scope of anticipation have received far less attention than its invocation. The main objective of this article is to advance the theoretical-conceptual treatment of anticipation. On the one hand, it assumes that there is a connection between the ways of thinking about and using the future and the fields of science, technology and innovation that are considered the object of ethical-political problematisation. On the other hand, the article evaluates each of these forms of anticipatory articulation of responsibility on the basis of their respective ethico-political radicality.

Bibliographic References

  • Adam, Barbara y Groves, Chris (2011). Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 31(1), 17-27. doi: 10.1177/0270467610391237
  • Alvial-Palavicino, Carla (2015). The Future as Practice. A Framework to Understand Anticipation in Science and Technology. TECNOSCIENZA. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(2), 135-172.
  • Barben, Daniel, Fisher, Erik, Selin, Cynthia y Guston, David H. (2008). Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration. En Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, y Judy Wajcman (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Third Edition (pp. 979-1000). Cambridge, MA y Londres: The MIT Press.
  • Beckert, Jens (2011). Imagined Futures: Fictionality in Economic Action. Colonia: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
  • Borup, Mads, Brown, Nik, Konrad, Kornelia y Van Lente, Harro (2006). The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 285-298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002
  • Brown, Nik, Rappert, Brian y Webster, Andrew (2000). Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Aldershot y Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Coates, Joe F. (1971). Technology Assessment: The Benefits… the Costs… the Consequences. The Futurist, 5, 225-231.
  • Collingridge, David (1980). The Social Control of Technology. Londres: Francis Pinter Ltd.
  • Eizagirre, Andoni, Rodríguez, Hannot e Ibarra, Andoni (2017). Politicizing Responsible Innovation: Responsibility as Inclusive Governance. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1(1), 20-36. doi: 10.3724/sp.J.1440.101003
  • Emirbayer, Mustafa y Mische, Ann (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. doi: 10.1086/231294
  • European Commission (2013). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2014–2015: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2013) 8631 of 10 December 2013. Bruselas.
  • European Commission (2017). Horizon 2020, Work Programme 2016–2017: 16. Science with and for Society, C(2017)2468 of 24 April 2017. Bruselas.
  • Ferrari, Arianna y Lösch, Andreas (2017). How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices. NanoEthics, 11(1), 75–91. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0282-9
  • Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2), 226–243. doi: 10.1177/016224399001500204
  • Fisher, Erik (2019). Governing with ambivalence: The tentative origins of socio-technical integration. Research Policy, 48(5), 1138-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.010
  • Grin, John y Grunwald, Armin (2000). Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment. Berlín y Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Grunwald, Armin (2019a). The inherently democratic nature of technology assessment. Science and Public Policy, 46(5), 702-709. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scz023
  • Grunwald, Armin (2019b). The objects of technology assessment. Hermeneutic extension of consequentialist reasoning. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 96-112. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1647086
  • Guston, David H. (2013). “Daddy, Can I Have a Puddle Gator?”: Creativity, Anticipation, and Responsible Innovation. En Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, y Maggy Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 109-118). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Guston, David H. (2014). Understanding 'anticipatory governance'. Social Studies of Science, 44(2), 218–242. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669
  • Guston, David H. y Sarewitz, Daniel (2002). Real-time technology assessment. Technology in Society, 24(1-2), 93-109. doi: 10.1016/s0160-791x(01)00047-1
  • Hölscher, Lucian (2018). Future‐Thinking. A Historical Perspective. En Gabriele Oettingen, Timur A. Sevincer, y Peter M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), The Psychology of Thinking about the Future. Nueva York y Londres: The Guildford Press.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila (2015). Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. En Sheila Jasanoff y Sang-Hyun Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power (pp. 1-33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila (2020). Imagined worlds: The politics of future-making in the twenty-first century. En Andreas Wenger, Ursula Jasper, y Myriam Dunn Cavelty (Eds.), The Politics and Science of Prevision: Governing and Probing the Future (pp. 27–44). Londres: Routledge.
  • Jasanoff, Sheila y Kim, Sang-Hyun (Eds.) (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jones, Richard (2008a). The economy of promises. Nature Nanotechnology, 3(2), 65-66. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.14
  • Jones, Richard (2008b). Fearing the fear of nanotechnology. Nature. doi: 10.1038/news.2008.1290
  • Konrad, Kornelia Elke, van Lente, Harro, Groves, Christopher y Selin, Cynthia (2016). Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology. En Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouche, Clark A. Miller, y Laurel Smith-Doerrv (Eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Fourth Edition (pp. 465-493). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Konrad, Kornelia y Alvial Palavicino, Carla (2017). Evolving Patterns of Governance of, and by, Expectations: The Graphene Hype Wave. En Diana M. Bowman, Elen Stokes, y Arie Rip (Eds.), Embedding New Technologies into Society: A Regulatory, Ethical and Societal Perspective (pp. 187-218). Singapur: Pan Stanford.
  • Lösch, Andreas (2006). Anticipating the futures of nanotechnology: Visionary images as means of communication. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3-4), 393-409. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777168
  • Lösch, Andreas, Grunwald, Armin, Meister, Martin y Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo (Eds.) (2019). Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present. Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  • Lösch, Andreas, Heil, Reinhard y Schneider, Christoph (2017). Responsibilization through visions. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 4(2), 138-156. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1360717
  • Mische, Ann (2009). Projects and Possibilities: Researching Futures in Action. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694-704. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x
  • Owen, Richard y Pansera, Mario (2019). Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation. En Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, y Weert Canzler (Eds.), Handbook on Science and Public Policy (pp. 26-48). Cheltenham y Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Owen, Richard, Stilgoe, Jack, Macnaghten, Phil, Gorman, Mike, Fisher, Erik y Guston, David H. (2013). A Framework for Responsible Innovation. En Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, y Maggy Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 27-50). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Poli, Roberto (2017). Introduction to Anticipation Studies (Vol. 1). Cham: Springer.
  • Rip, Arie (2006). Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. Science as Culture, 15(4), 349-365. doi: 10.1080/09505430601022676
  • Rip, Arie y Kulve, Haico te (2008). Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios. En Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, y Jameson M. Wetmore (Eds.), The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures (pp. 49-70). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Schneider, Christoph y Lösch, Andreas (2019). Visions in assemblages: Future-making and governance in FabLabs. Futures, 109, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.08.00
  • Schot, Johan y Rip, Arie (1997). The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 54(2-3), 251-268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
  • Selin, Cynthia (2011). Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 723-737. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x
  • Simakova, Elena y Coenen, Christopher (2013). Visions, Hype, and Expectations: A Place for Responsibility. En Richard Owen, John Bessant, y Maggy Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 241-267). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Stilgoe, Jack, Owen, Richard y Macnaghten, Phil (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  • Urueña, Sergio (2022, en prensa). Anticipation and modal power: Opening-up and closing-down the momentum of sociotechnical systems. Social Studies of Science.
  • Von Schomberg, René (2013). A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. En Richard Owen, John R. Bessant, y Maggy Heintz (Eds.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society (pp. 51-74). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Von Schomberg, René (2014). The Quest for the ‘Right’ Impacts of Science and Technology: A Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation. En Jeroen van den Hoven, Neelke Doorn, Tsjalling Swierstra, Bert-Jaap Koops, y Henny Romijn (Eds.), Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues (pp. 33-50). Dordrecht: Springer.
Data source: Dialnet