The Treaty of Lisbon and the gender–blind responses to the EU crisesimpact on the quality of European democracy

Bibliographic References

• Abels, G. and J. M. Mushaben (2012): Gendering the European Union: new approaches to Old Democratic Deficits. Palgrave Macmillan
• Achilleos–Sarll, C. and B. Martill (2019): “Toxic Masculinity: Militarism, Deal–Making and the Performance of Brexit” in Dustin, M; N. Ferreira and S. Millns, eds., Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–44. DOI 10.1007/978–3–030–03122–0
• Alonso, A. and E. Lombardo (2018): “Gender Equality and De–Democratization Processes: The Case of Spain”, Politics and Governance, 6 (3), pp. 78–89. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v6i3.1419
• Alonso Alvarez, A., and Arnaut, C. (2017): “¿Democratizando la intersectionalidad? estructuras participativas y políticas de igualdad en Portugal” Investigaciones Feministas, 8(1), pp. 165-181. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54846
• Bellamy R. and W. Merkel, eds; and R. Bhargava; J. Bidadanure; T. Christiano; U. Felt; C. Hay; L. Lamboy; T. Pogrebinschi, G. Smith, G. Talshir, N. Urbinati, M. Verloo (2018): Chapter 14– Challenges of Inequality to Democracy, , In International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP): Rethinking Society for the 21st Century: Report of the International Panel on Social Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 563– 596. DOI 10.1017/9781108399661
• Bisio, L and A. Cataldi (2008): The Treaty of Lisbon from a gender perspective: changes and challenges. Brussels: Wide network.
• Bruff, I. and S. Wöhl (2016): “Constitutionalizing Austerity, Disciplining the Household: Masculine Norms of Competitiveness and the Crisis of Social Reproduction in the Eurozone” In Hozic, A. A. and J. True, eds., Scandalous Economics. Gender and the Politics of Financial Crises, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–108. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204235.003.0006
• Bugaric, B. (2016): “Protecting Democracy Inside the EU: On Article 7 TEU and the Hungarian Turn to Authoritarianism” in Closa, C. and Kochenov, D. (eds.). Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chilcott, A. (2017): Gendering Brexit the role and concerns of feminists and women’s rights organisations. Brussels: Gender Five Plus.
• Danisi, C; M. Dustin and N. Ferreira (2019): “Queering Brexit: What’s in Brexit for Sexual and Gender Minorities?” in Dustin, M; N. Ferreira and S. Millns, Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 239–272. DOI 10.1007/978–3–030–03122–0
• Dustin, M; N. Ferreira and S. Millns, (2019): Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI 10.1007/978–3–030–03122–0
• Fagan, C. and J. Rubery (2018): “Advancing Gender Equality through European Employment Policy: The Impact of the UK’s EU Membership and the Risks of Brexit” Social Policy & Society 17 (2), pp. 297–317. doi:10.1017/S1474746417000458
• Galligan, Y. (2015): “States of democracy: An overview”. In Y. Galligan, ed., States of democracy: Gender and politics in the European Union, New York: Routledge, pp. 1–14. DOI 10.4324/9781315740522
• Gill, A. K and N. Ahmed (2019): “A New World Order?” in Dustin, M; N. Ferreira and S. Millns, eds., Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan., pp. 44–60. DOI 10.1007/978–3–030–03122–0
• Gostyńska–Jakubowska, A. (2016): Poland: Europe’s new enfant terrible?, Brussels: Center for Europen Reform.
• Guerrina, R. and A. Masselot (2018): “Walking into the Footprint of EU Law: Unpacking the Gendered Consequences of Brexit”, Cambridge University Press, Social Policy & Society 17 (2), pp. 319–330. DOI 10.1017/S1474746417000501
• Guerrina, R., and H. Murphy. (2016): Strategic silences in the Brexit debate: Gender, marginality and governance. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12 (4), pp. 872 –880.
• Gubin, E. (2007) : Eliane Vogel–Polsky, une femme de conviction. Institut pour l’égalité des femmes et des hommes, pp. 1–170. D/2007/10.043/11
• Hill Collins, P. (2017): “La diferencia que crea el poder: interseccionalidad y profundización democrática” Investigaciones Feministas, 8(1), pp. 19–39. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54888
• Holzleithner, Elizabeth (2018): “Subersion from within Opposition to gender equality in the court of Justice of the EU” in Verloo, M., ed., Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. Gender and Comparative Politics. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 118–134. DOI 10.1201/9781315625744
• Hozic, A. A. and J. True (2016): Scandalous Economics. Gender and the Politics of Financial Crises, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204235.003.0006
• Irigoien Domínguez, A. (2019): On the road to gender equality: gender balance in the European Economic and Social Committee. Brussels: European Economic and Social Committee. DOI 10.2864/019787
• Irigoien Domínguez, A. (2018): European Parliament’s Elections 2019: towards gender parity in Europe. Brussels: Gender Five Plus (G5+)
• Kantola, J. (2010): Gender and the European Union. The European Union Series. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI 10.1007/978–1–137–03745–9
• Kantola, J. and E. Lombardo (2017): Gender and the economic crisis in Europe: Politics, Institutions and Intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Karamessini, M. (2014): “Structural Crisis and Adjustment in Greece: Social Regression and the Challenge to Gender Equality”. In Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality I, ed. M. Karamessini and J. Rubery, 165–185. London: Routledge.
• Karamessini, M. and J. Rubery (2014): Women and Austerity: The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality I, London: Routledge.
• Krizsán, A. and C. Roggeband (2019): Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative agenda. CPS Books series. Budapest: Central European University.
• Krizsán. A. and Sebestyén, A. (2019): “Politicizing gender equality and women’s movement reaction to it in Hungary” in Krizsán, A. and C. Roggeband, eds., Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative agenda. CPS Books series. Budapest: Central European University, pp. 79–119.
• Koukoulis–Spiliotopoulos, S. (2008): “The Lisbon Treaty and the Charter of Fundamental Rights: maintaining and developing the acquis in gender equality”European Gender Equality Law Review 1, pp. 15–24.
• Koutrakos, P (2019): “On Transparency—but do not mention Brexit!” European Law Review, 5, pp. 587–588.
• La Barbera, M. C. (2017): “La interseccionalidad y sus viajes: de las teorías feministas contrahegemonicas al derecho de la democracia europea multinivel” Investigaciones Feministas, 8(1): 131-149. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54858
• Locher, B. (2012) “Gendering the EU policy process and constructing the gender acquis” in Abels, G. and J. M. Mushaben, eds., Gendering the European Union: new approaches to Old Democratic Deficits, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63– 84.
• Lombardo, E. (2007): “Gender Equality in the Constitution–Making Process” In D. Castiglione, J. Schönlau, C. Longman, E. Lombardo, N. Pérez–Solórzano Borragán and M. Aziz, Constitutional Politics in theEuropean Union: The Convention Moment and its Aftermath. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Lombardo, E., and Rolandsen Agustín, L. (2016): “Intersectionality in European Union policymaking: the case of gender-based violence” Politics, 36(4), pp. 364–373. DOI: 10.1177/0263395716635184
• Martínez-Palacios, J. (2017): “Exclusión, profundización democrática e interseccionalidad” Investigaciones Feministas, 8(1), pp. 53-71. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.54827
• Mazey, S. (2001): Gender mainstreaming in the EU: principles and practice. European Dossier Series, London: Kogan Page
• Meyerrose, A. M. (2017): “Building Strong Executives and Weak Institutions: How European Integration Contributes to Democratic Backsliding” Working paper, Council of European Studies Conference 2017
• Morlino, L. (2009): Democracias y democratizaciones. Madrid: CIS.
• Pearson, R. and D. Elson (2015): “Transcending the Impact of the Financial Crisis in the United Kingdom: Towards Plan F – A Feminist Economic Strategy”, Feminist Review, 109 (1), pp– 8–30.
• Pollack, M. A, and E. Hafner–Burton (2000): “Mainstreaming gender in the European Union” Journal of European Public Policy, 7 (3), pp. 432–456. DOI 10.1080/13501760050086116
• Querton, C. (2019): “The Impact of Brexit on Gender and Asylum Law in the UK” in Dustin, M; N. Ferreira and S. Millns, eds., Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit. Gender Politics series. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–238. DOI 10.1007/978–3–030–03122–0
• Roggeband, C. and A. Krizsán (2019): “The Challenge to Gender Democracy” in Krizsán, A. and C. Roggeband, eds., Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative agenda. CPS Books series. Budapest: Central European University. pp.200–213.
• Rubio–Marin, R. (2012): “A New European Parity–Democracy Sex Equality model and why it won’t fly in the United States”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60 (1), pp. 99–125.
• Severs, E., Celis, K., and Erzeel, S. (2017): “Poder, privilegio y desventaja: teoría interseccional y representación política”. Investigaciones Feministas, 8(1), pp. 41-51. https://doi.org/10.5209/INFE.56400
• Squires, J. (2010): “Beyond Multiple Inequalities: Transversal Intersectionality, Diversity Mainstreaming and Participative Democracy”. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 2–3, pp. 85–93 https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i2–3.28017
• Stratigaki, M. (2005): “Gender mainstreaming vs positive action: An ongoing conflict in EU gender equality policy”, European Journal of Women's Studies, 12 (2), pp. 65–186.
• Syrpis, P. (2017): “European Union (Withdrawal) Bill: paving the way towards a very uncertain future’, University of Bristol Law School Blog. Available on the web: http://legalresearch.blogs.bris.ac.uk/2017/07/european–union–withdrawal–bill–paving–the–way–towards–a–very–uncertain–future/#more–734 [Query: 2 April 2020].
• Szcygielska, M. (2019): ““Good change” and better activism: feminist responses to backsliding gender policies in Poland” in Krizsán, A. and C. Roggeband, eds., Gendering Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe. A comparative agenda. CPS Books series. Budapest: Central European University, pp. 120–160.
• Tartar, A. (2017): “How the Populist Right Is Redrawing the Map of Europe”, Bloomberg. Available on the web: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017–europe–populist–right/ [Query: 2 April 2020]
• Toemmel, I. (2009): “The Treaty of Lisbon– a step toward enhancing leadership in the EU” Paper delivered at the EUSA–Conference in Los Angeles, CA, 23–25 April.
• Van der Vleuten, A. (2012): “Gendering the Institutions and Actors of the EU” in Abels, G. and J. M. Mushaben ed., Gendering the European Union: new approaches to Old Democratic Deficits. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 41–62.
• Van der Vleuten, A. (2019): “Intersectionalising EU policies” in Crowley, N. and S. Sansonetti eds., New Visions for Gender Equality 2019, European Commission, pp.54–57.
• Verloo, M. (2017): Episteme, polity and inequality regimes: New dynamics and configurations. Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Nottingham, UK.
• Verloo, M (2018a): “Understanding the dynamics of opposition to gender equality change: lessons from and for Social Complexity Theory” in Verloo, M. Varieties of Opposition to Gender Equality in Europe. New York and London: Routledge, pp. DOI 10.1201/9781315625744
• Vogel-Polsky, É. (1998): “Comment recourir au concept de Good Governance pour garantir la participation égale des femmes au pouvoir ?”, Le pouvoir en force. Actes du colloque de Bruxelles, Bruxelles : MET, pp. 39-54
• Walby, S. (2015): Crisis, Cambridge: Polity.
• Woodward, A. E. (2012): “From Equal Treatment to Gender Mainstreaming and Diversity Management” in Abels, G. and J. M. Mushaben ed., Gendering the European Union: new approaches to Old Democratic Deficits. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 85–103.
• Young, I. M. (2000): Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Constitution of Poland (1997). English version available at the web: http://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm[Query: 28 April 2020]
• Electoral Commission of the United Kingdom (UK): 2019: “Results and turnout at the EU referendum”. Available on the web: https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/who–we–are–and–what–we–do/elections–and–referendums/past–elections–and–referendums/eu–referendum/results–and–turnout–eu–referendum [Query: 2 April 2020]
• European Commission, Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men (2009): Opinion on The Gender Perspective on the response to the economic and financial crisis. Social Europe, 15, pp. 1–15.
• European Commission. EU Budget (2020): “European Parliament’s approval of the EU budget”. Available on the web: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/eu–budget/how–it–works/annual–lifecycle/assessment/parliaments–approval_en [Query: 25 March 2020]
• European Council (2020): “Brexit” Available on the web: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eu–uk–after–referendum/[Query: 2 April 2020]
• European Parliament, Fact Sheets (2020): The Treaty of Lisbon. Available on the web: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the–treaty–of–lisbon [Query: 25 March 2020]
• European Parliament, About Parliament (2020): Powers and Procedures of the European Parliament: budgetary power. Available on the web: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about–parliament/en/powers–and–procedures/budgetary–powers [Query: 13 March 2020]
• European Parliament, Committee on Budgetary Control (2019): 2018 Discharge. Questionnaire to the European Economic and Social Committee. Brussels: European Parliament
• Aries, Q. (2017): “Michel Barnier’s Brexit dream team” POLITICO. Available on the web: https://www.politico.eu/article/michel–barnier–brexit–dream–team–negotiation–europe–commission [Query: 2 April 2020]
• Barr, H. (2017): “Brexit Without Women”. Human Rights Watch. Available on the web: https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/06/21/brexit–without–women [Query: 2 April 2020]
• Chander, S. (2019): “Why is Brussels so white? The EU’s race problem that no one talks about” The Guardian. Available on the web: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/may/19/eu–race–problem–european–elections–meps–migrants–minorities [Query: 1 April 2020]
• Rankin, J. (2017): “Brexit talks: how the two teams line up”. The Guardian. Available on the web: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jun/19/brexit–talks–how–the–two–teams–line–up–davis–barnier [Query: 2 April 2020]
• Reuters. (2017) : “EU expresses worry over Poland reviving different retirement age for men and women” Reuters World News. Available on the web: https://www.reuters.com/article/us–eu–poland–pensions/eu–expresses–worry–over–poland–reviving–different–retirement–age–for–men–and–women–idUSKBN1AN1PV [Query: 28 April 2020]
• Wahl, T. (2019): “No Progress in Art. 7 TEU Procedure Against Poland and Hungary” EUCrim. Available on the web: https://eucrim.eu/news/no–progress–art–7–teu–procedure–against–poland–and–hungary/ [Query: 3 April 2020]