El género del fin del mundoAportes de la investigación feminista por la paz ante el mantropoceno

Referencias bibliográficas

• Ahmed, Nafeez (2019), “Guerra en el antropoceno: la hiperrealidad de la economía biofísica militar”, Revista Papeles de relaciones internacionales y cambio global, No. 146, pp. 57-69.
• Alaimo, Stacy (2009), “Trans-Corporeal Feminisms and the Ethical Space of Nature”, inAlaimo, Stacy & Hekman, Susan (eds.) Material Feminisms,Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 237-264.
• Asberg, Cecilia & Braidotti, Rosi (2018), A Feminist Companion to the Posthumanities, Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
• Asberg, Cecilia;Thiele, Kathrin & van der Tuin, Iris (2015), “Speculative before the Turn. Reintroducing Feminist Materialist Performativity”, Cultural Studies Review,Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 145-172.
• Braidotti, Rosi (2002), Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming, Cambridge & Malden: Polity.
• Burke, Anthony D. & Fishel, Stephanie (2020), “Across Species and Borders: Political Representation, Ecological Democracy and the Non-Human”, inCastro Pereira, Joana & Saramago, André (eds.), NonHuman Nature in World Politics: Theory and Practice, Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 33-52.
• Carson, Rachel (1962) Silent Spring,New York: Houghton Mifflin.
• Cohn, Carol & Duncanson, Claire (2020), “Women, Peace and Security in a Changing Climate”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, DOI: 10.1080/14616742.2020.1843364
• Cockburn, Cynthia (2004), “The Continuum of Violence: A Gender Perspective on War and Peace”, inGiles, Wenona & Hyndman, Jennifer (eds.), Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones, Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press, pp. 24-44.
• Cockburn, Cynthia (2007), From Where We Stand: War, Women’s Activism & Feminist Analysis, London & New York: ZedBooks.
• Cockburn, Cynthia (2010), “Gender Relations as Causal in Militarisation and War: a Feminist Standpoint”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol.12, No. 2, pp. 139-157.
• Coole, Diana (2013), “Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences”,Millenium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 451-469.
• Cudworth, Erika (2013), “Armed Conflict, Insecurity and Gender: The Resilience of Patriarchy?”, Resilience, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 69-75.
• De Cózar Escalante, José Manuel (2019), “Feminismo del Antropoceno”, Revista Laguna,No. 44, pp. 59-68.
• Detraz, Nicole (2015), Environmental Security and Gender,London & New York: Routledge.
• Duncanson, Claire (2016), Gender & Peacebuilding, Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
• Ebron, Paula & Tsing, Anna (2017), “Feminism and the Anthropocene: Assessing the Field through Recent Books”, Feminist Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 658-683.
• El-Bushra, Judy (2007), “Feminism, Gender and Women’s Peace Activism”, Development and Change, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 131-147.
• Evans, Brad & Reid, Julian (2014), Resilient Life. The Art of Living Dangerously,Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
• Giles, Wenona & Hyndman, Jennifer (eds.) (2004), Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones,Los Angeles & Londres: University of California Press.
• Glabau, Danya (2017), “Feminists Write the Anthropocene: Three Tales of Possibility in Late Capitalism”, Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 541-548.
• Grusin, Richard (ed.) (2017a), Anthropocene Feminism, Minneapolis & London: Minnesota University Press.
• Grusin, Richard (2017b), “Introduction. Antropocene Feminism: An Experiment in Collaborative Theorizing”, inGrusin, Richard (ed.), Anthropocene Feminism,Minneapolis & London: Minnesota University Press, pp. vii-xix.
• Haifa, Eva (2019), What Comes after Entanglement? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion,Durham & London: Duke University Press.
• Haraway, Donna (1985), “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s”, Socialist Review, Vol. 2, pp. 65-107.
• Haraway, Donna (2008), When Species Meet, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Haraway, Donna (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene,Durham: Duke University Press.
• Hedström, Jenny (2019), “On Violence, the Everyday, and Social Reproduction: Agnesand Myanmar’s Transition”, Peacebuilding, https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2021.1881329
• Lyytikäinen, Miina; Yadavm Punam; Wibben, Annick T.R.; Jauhola, Marjaana&Confortini, Catia C. (2020), “Unruly Wives in the Household: Toward Feminist Genealogies of Peace Research”, Cooperation and Conflict, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 3-25.
• Magallón, Carmen (2006), Mujeres en pie de paz, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
• Martín de Almagro Iniesta, María (2018), “Hybrid Clubs: A Feminist Approach to Peacebuilding in the Democratic Republic of Congo”, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 319-334.
• Mathews, Freya (2017), “The Dilemma of Dualism”, inMacGregor, Sherilyn (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment,London & New York: Routledge, pp. 54-70.
• Mehtan, Leyla y Leach, Melissa (2019), “¿Por qué la igualdad de género y la sostenibilidad van de la mano?”, en VVAA, Por qué las mujeres salvarán el planeta, Barcelona: Rayo Verde Editorial.
• Mendia, Irantzu (2014), La división sexual del trabajo por la paz: género y rehabilitación posbélica en El Salvador y Bosnia-Herzegovina,Madrid: Tecnos.
• Merchant, Carolyn (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, San Francisco: Harper Collins.Mies, María y Shiva, Vandana (2016), Ecofeminismo, Madrid: Icaria.
• Nansen, Karin (2019), “Los estrechos lazos entre la justicia social y medioambiental”, en VVAA, Por qué las mujeres salvarán el planeta,Barcelona: Rayo Verde Editorial.
• Naraghi-Anderlini, Sanam (2007), Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why it Matters,Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
• Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala; Haynes, Dina Francesca & Cahn, Naomi (2011), On the Frontlines. Gender, War, and the Post-Conflict Process,Oxford & Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
• Plumwood, Val (1993), Feminism and the Mastery of Nature,London: Routledge.
• Plumwood, Val (2018), “Ecofeminist Analysis and the Culture of Ecological Denial”, inStevens, Lara; Tait, Peta & Varney, Denise (eds.), Feminist Ecologies: Changing Environments in the Anthropocene, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97-112.
• Raworth, Kate (2014), “Must the Anthropocene be a Manthropocene?”, The Guardian, October 20. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/20/anthropocene-working-group-science-gender-bias[consultado el 22 de febrero de 2021].
• Salleh, Ariel (1997/2017), Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx, and the Postmodern,London & New York: Zed Books.
• Shiva, Vandana (2019), “La estrecha relación entre el empoderamiento de las mujeres y la sostenibilidad”, en VVAA, Por qué las mujeres salvarán el planeta,Barcelona: Rayo Verde Editorial, pp.351-382.
• Sideris, Lisa (2016), “Anthropocene Convergences: A Report from the Field”, inEmmet, Robert & Lekan, Thomas (de.) Whose Anthropocene? Revisiting Dipesh Chakrabarty’s ‘Four Theses’. Transformations in Environment and Society, No. 2, pp. 89-96.
• SIPRI (2020)“Global Expenditure Sees Largest Annual Increase in a Decade –says SIPRI–Reaching $1917 billion in 2019”, Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, April 27. https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2020/global-military-expenditure-sees-largest-annual-increase-decade-says-sipri-reaching-1917-billion[consultado el 25 de febrero de 2021].
• Stevens, Lara; Tait, Peta& Varney, Denise (eds.) (2018a), Feminist Ecologies: Chaging Environments in the Anthropocene,Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Stevens, Lara; Tait, Peta& Varney, Denise (2018b), “’Street-Fighters and Philosophers’: Traversing Ecofeminisms”, inStevens, Lara; Tait, Peta& Varney, Denise (eds.), Feminist Ecologies: Chaging Environments in the Anthropocene, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-22.
• Thapar-Björkert, Suruchi; Samelius, Lotta & Sanghera, GurchathenS. (2019), “Exploring Symbolic Violence in the Everyday: Misrecognition, Condescension, Consent and Complicity”, Feminist Review, No. 112, pp. 144-162.
• Thompson, Charis & MacGregor, Sherilyn (2017), “The Death of Nature. Foundations of Ecological FeministThought”, inMacGregor, Sherilyn (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Gender and Environment,London & New York: Routledge, pp. 43-53.
• Tsing, Anna L. (2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Tsing, Anna L. (2016), “Earth Stalked by Man”, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 2-16.
• Warren, Karen J. & Cady, Duane L. (1994), “Feminism and Peace”, Hypatia, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 4-20.
• Wibben, Annick T.R. (2021), “Genealogies of Feminist Peace Research: Themes, Thinkers, and Turns”, inVäyrynen, Tarja; Parashar, Swati; Féron, Élise & Confortini, Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional 60Catia C.(eds.), Routledge Handbook of Feminist Peace Research,Londres & Nueva York: Routledge, pp. 17-27.
• Williams, Mai’a (2019), This Is How We Survive. Revolutionary Mothering, War, and Exile in the 21st Century,Oakland: PM Press.