Introduction

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bousfield, D., 2008, Impoliteness in Interaction, Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167
• Brown, P., & S. C. Levinson, 1978, «Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena», in: E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and politeness: strategies in social interaction, Cambridge: CUP, 56-311.
• Brown, P., & S. C. Levinson, 1987, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge: CUP.
• Catrambone, M., 2016, «Off-record politeness in Sophocles: The patterned dialogues of female characters», Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 12(2), 173-196.
• Chalupnik, M., C. Christie & L. Mullany, 2017, «(Im)politeness and Gender», in: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, D. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_20
• Conti, L., 2019, «De la duda a la certeza: sobre el uso de ἴσως en el teatro griego», Incontri linguistici 42, 91-116.
• Conti, L., 2020a, «Zur Entwicklung von ἑκὼν εἶναι im Altgriechischen: von limitativer Infinitivkonstruktion zum parenthetischen Ausdruck», Indogermanische Forschungen 125.1, 217-237.
• Conti, L., 2020b, «La cortesía verbal en Sófocles: análisis del optativo potencial en actos de habla directivos», Emerita 88.2, 229-250.
• Conti, L., 2021a, «Off and on record complaints in Sophocles: a first approach», in: G. Giannakis et al. (eds.), Synchrony and Diachrony of Ancient Greek: Language, Linguistics and Philology, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 321-330.
• Conti, L., 2021b, «A first approach to ἡμεῖς in place of ἐγώ in Sophocles and Euripides: A deactualising device and expression of self-dignity», Graeco-Latina Brunensia 26.1, 23-35.
• Conti, L., 2021c, «Sincronía y diacronía de los adverbios de aproximación en griego antiguo», Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 2021.2, 175-190.
• Culpeper, J., 1996, «Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness», Journal of Pragmatics 25, 349-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
• Culpeper, J., 2005, «Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link», Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1), 35-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
• Culpeper, J., 2011, Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence, Cambridge: CUP.
• Culpeper, J., 2016, «Impoliteness Strategies», in: A. Capone, J. L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, Cham: Springer, 421-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16
• Culpeper, J., & C. Hardaker, 2017, «Impoliteness», in: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, D. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 199-226.
• Culpeper, J., M. Haugh & D. Kádár (eds.), 2017, The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Culpeper J., & M. Terkourafi, 2017, «Pragmatic approaches (im)politeness», in: J. Culpeper, D. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 11-39.
• Denizot, C., 2011, Donner des ordres en grec ancien: étude linguistique des formes de l'injonction, Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre.
• Dickey, E., 1995, «Forms of address and conversational language in Aristophanes and Menander», Mnemosyne 48, 257-271.
• Dickey, E., 1996, Greek forms of address. From Herodotus to Lucian, Oxford, New York: OUP.
• Dickey, E., 2003, «Latin influence on the Greek of documentary papyri: An analysis of its chronological distribution», Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 145, 249-257.
• Dickey, E., 2004, «The Greek address system of the Roman period and its relationship to Latin», Classical Quarterly 54, 494-527.
• Dickey, E., 2009, «Latin influence and Greek request formulae», in: T. V. Evans, D. Obbink (eds.), The Language of the Papyri, Oxford: OUP: 208-220.
• Dickey, E., 2012a, «How to say “please” in classical Latin», Classical Quarterly 62, 731-748.
• Dickey, E., 2012b, «The rules of politeness and Latin request formulae», in: P. Probert and A. Willi (eds.), Laws and rules in Indo-European, Oxford: OUP, 313–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609925.001.0001
• Dickey, E., 2016, «Politeness in ancient Rome: can it help us evaluate modern politeness theories?», Journal of Politeness Research 12 (2), 197-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0008
• Eelen, G., 2001, Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
• Fornieles, R., 2020a, «Sobre un mecanismo de (des)cortesía verbal entre Esquines y Demóstenes: La impersonalización con el pronombre indefinido τις», Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 125 (2), 131-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-1718_77_4
• Fornieles, R., 2020b, «La lítote como mecanismo de descortesía verbal en Esquines y Demóstenes», Exemplaria Classica. Journal of Classical Philology 24, 13-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33776/ec.v24i0.4976
• Fornieles, R., 2021a, «Impersonalization as a mechanism of impoliteness in Aeschines and Demosthenes: a study of οὐδείς and μηδείς», in: G. Giannakis et al., Synchrony and Diachrony of Ancient Greek, Berlin: De Gruyter, 347-355.
• Fornieles, R., 2021b, «Una aproximación a la descortesía verbal en los insultos entre Esquines y Demóstenes», Humanitas 77, 67-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-1718_77_4
• Freed, A., & A. Greenwood, 1996, «Women, men, and type of talk: What makes the difference?», Language in Society 25(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404500020418
• Goffman, E., 1955, «On face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction», Psychiatry 18(3), 213-231. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
• Goffman, E., 1967, Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior, New York: Doubleday & Company.
• Haverkate, H., 2004, «El análisis de la cortesía comunicativa, categorización pragmalingüística de la cultura española», in: D. Bravo, A. Briz (eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: análisis del discurso de cortesía en español, Barcelona: Ariel, 55-65.
• Hall, J., 2009, Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters, Oxford: OUP.
• Holmes, J., 1995, Women, Men and Politeness, London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845722
• Haugh, M., D. Kádár & M. Terkourafi, 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, Cambridge: CUP.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., 1992, Les interactions verbales. II, Paris: Armand Colin.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., 1994, Les interactions verbales. III, Paris: Armand Colin.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., 2004, «¿Es universal la cortesía?», in: D. Bravo, A. Briz, Pragmática Sociocultural. Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, Ariel: Barcelona, 39-54.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C., 2005, «Politeness in France: How to Buy Bread Politely», in: L. Hickey, M. Stewart (eds.), Politeness in Europe, Clevedon, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597398-004
• Kienpointner, M., & M. Stopfner, 2017, «Ideology and (Im)politeness», in: J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, D. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 61-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4
• Lakoff, R., 1973, «The Logic of Politeness; Or, Minding your P’s and Q’s», Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago: Linguistics Society, 292-305.
• Lakoff, R., 1989, «The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse», Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 8(2-3), 101-130.
• Leech, G., 1983, Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.
• Leech, G., 2014, The Pragmatics of Politeness, Oxford: OUP.
• Lloyd, J., 2006, «Sophocles in the Light of Face-Threat Politeness Theory», in: A. Rijksbaron, I. J. F. de Jong (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics, Leiden: Brill, 225-240.
• Lloyd, J., 2009, «The Language of the Gods: Politeness in the Prologue of the Troades», in: M. Lloyd, J. Cousland, J. Hume (eds.), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp, Leiden: Brill, 183-192.
• Lloyd, J., 2012, «Sophocles the Ironist», in: A. Marantonatos (ed.), Brill’s companion to Sophocles, Leiden: Boston, 563-577.
• Lloyd, J., 2018, «The hortative aorist», CQ 68.2, 415-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838819000132
• Martin, G., F. Iurescia, S. Hof & G. Sorrentino (eds.), 2021, Pragmatic Approaches to Drama. Studies in Communication on the Ancient Stage, Leiden / Boston: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440265
• Mills, S., 2003, Gender and politeness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mullany, L., 2010, «Gender and interpersonal pragmatics», in: M. A. Locher, S. L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 225-250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.225
• McDonald, K., 2016, «The sociolinguistics of gender, social status and masculinity in Aristophanes», Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2.2, 155-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0011
• Matsumoto, Y., 1988 «Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese», Journal of Pragmatics 12(4), 403-426.
• Napoli, M., & M. Ravetto, 2017, Exploring Intensification. Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Poccetti, P., 2014, «Politeness & Courtesy Expressions», in: G. K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, 3, Leiden, Boston: Brill, 112-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_SIM_00000514
• Redondo-Moyano, E., 2021, «(Des)cortesía verbal y caracterización en el tercer Mimiambo de Herodas», Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 31, 67-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/cfcg.71334
• Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2019, La lengua de los personajes. Caracterización lingüística en la obra de Eurípides a partir de los Heraclidas, Universidad de Sevilla (tesis doctoral).
• Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2020a, «(Im)politeness Strategies in Euripides: An Approach to Linguistic Characterisation through Qualitative Data Analysis», Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum 139, 271-298.
• Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2020b, «Overpoliteness in Euripides», Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae, 30(1), 73-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl
• Rodríguez Piedrabuena, S., 2020c, «Terms of Address on Right Periphery in Greek Tragedy», in: G. Martin et al. (eds.), Pragmatic Approaches to Drama Studies in Communication on the Ancient Stage, 70-95, Leiden: Brill.
• Sorrentino, G., 2013, Comunicazione e relazioni interpersonali nelle commedie di Menandro: un’indagine sul Dyscolos e sulla Samia, PhD thesis, University of Freiburg. DOI: https://freidok.uni‑freiburg.de/fedora/objects/freidok:9582/datastreams/FILE1/ content
• Schnurr, S., M. Marra & J. Holmes, «Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Māori and Pākehā leaders», Journal of Pragmatics 39.4, 712-729. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.016
• Sung, C. C. M., 2012, «Exploring the interplay of gender, discourse, and (im)politeness», Journal of Gender Studies 21.3, 285-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.681179
• Unceta Gómez, L., 2010, «La expresión del agradecimiento en la comedia latina», in: P. Anreiter, M. Kienpointner (eds.), Latin Linguistics today. Proceedings of the XVth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 625-637.
• Unceta Gómez, L., 2014, «La politesse linguistique en latin: bilan d’une étude en cours», Dictionnaire Historique et Encyclopédie Linguistique du Latin, IV : Encyclopédie Linguistique, Paris-Sorbonne. http://www.linglat.paris-sorbonne.fr/encyclopedie_linguistique:notions_linguistiques:syntaxe:formules_de_politesse
• Unceta Gómez, L., 2016a, «Congratulations in Latin Comedy: Types and functions», Journal of Politeness Research 12(2), 267-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0005
• Unceta Gómez, L., 2016b, «La respuesta al agradecimiento en la comedia de Plauto y Terencio», Pallas 102, 229-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.3716
• Unceta Gómez, L., 2017, «Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus», Latomus: revue d'études latines 76.1, 140-161.
• Verano, R., & Ch. Fedriani, 2021a, «Common Ground and Politeness in Latin and Greek Philosophical Dialogue», in: A. M. Martín Rodríguez (ed.), Linguisticae Dissertationes. Current Perspectives on Latin Grammar, Lexicon and Pragmatics. Selected Papers from the 20th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, June 17-21, 2019, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas, 651-664.
• Verano, R., & Ch. Fedriani, 2017, «Cortesía y conversación en el proemio del Parménides de Platón», in: L. Conti, J. de la Villa, R. Fornieles, L. Macía (eds.), Δῶρα τά οἱ δίδομεν φιλεόντες. Homenaje a Emilio Crespo, Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 321-329.
• Watts, R., 1989, «Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behavior», Multilingua 8, 131-166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131
• Watts, R., 2003, Politeness, Cambridge: CUP. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184