The management of moral hazard through the implementation of a Moral Compliance Model (MCM)

  1. Leire San-Jose 1
  2. Jose Felix Gonzalo 2
  3. Maite Ruiz-Roqueñi 2
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 UPV/EHU. Facultad de Economía y Empresa. Grupo ECRI
Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2022

Volumen: 28

Número: 1

Páginas: 97-107

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEEN.2021.100182 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumen

Moral hazard in an organization occurs when people make decisions and take a high risk for their own bene- fit, given that they would not have to bear all the negative ensuing consequences should they occur. This risk transferred to third parties is generally due to the catalysts that foster this risk, namely, information asymme- tries, power, trust and temporality. The contribution of our research lies in the inclusion of moral decisions in project management, thus demonstrating the feasibility of a Moral Compliance Model (MCM). This model is a complement to legal compliance and allows a connection to be established between Risk Management, Gov- ernance & Compliance. In 2019, experimental action research, combined with a Plan-Do-Check-Action applied to a company, were used to perform the analysis. The findings show that implementing this moral model in organisations is possible. However, what moral hazard is needs to be shown, along with identifying moral hazard situations and planning how to introduce moral hazard into the risk management model in order to reduce its negative effect or, ideally, eliminate it. We provide an overview of risks, including those around moral dilemma decisions; moral hazard situations that will expand compliance to integrated compli- ance in which not only legal, but also moral aspects are identified and assessed. Incorporating ethical dilem- mas in strategic decisions is a robust advance towards responsible businesses

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arjoon, S. (2005). Corporate governance: An ethical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 343–352. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-7888-5.
  • Arnott, R., & Stiglitz, J. (1991). Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets with moral hazard (No. w3588). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. American Economics Review, 53(5), 941–969.
  • Barbour, R. (2008). Doing focus groups. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781849208956.
  • Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001.
  • B€orzel, T. A., & Buzogany, A. (2019). Compliance with EU environmental law. The ice- berg is melting. Environmental Politics, 28(2), 315–341. doi:10.1080/09644016. 2019.1549772.
  • Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk manage- ment: Review, critique, and research directions. Long Range Planning, 48(4), 265– 276. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.005.
  • Caldwell, C., & Karri, R. (2005). Organizational governance and ethical systems: A cove- nantal approach to building trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1−3), 249 https:// doi.org/259. 10.1007/s10551-005-1419-2.
  • Chein, I., Cook, S. W., & Harding, J. (1948). The field of action research. American Psy- chologist, 3(2), 43–50. doi:10.1037/h0053515.
  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) & the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (2018). Enterprise risk management: Applying enterprise risk management to environmental, social and governance-related risks, https://www.wbcsd.org/. Accessed, 18 july 2020.
  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2004). Enter- prise risk management-integrated framework: Executive summary & framework. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) http://www.coso.org/. Accessed, 18 july 2020.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research method: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.1177/1524839915580941.
  • Dean Jr, J. W., & Sharfman, M. P. (1996). Does decision process matter? A study of stra- tegic decision-making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 368– 392. doi:10.5465/256784.
  • Dembe, A. E., & Boden, L. I. (2000). Moral hazard: A question of morality? New solu- tions. A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 10(3) https://doi. org/257-279. 10.2190/1GU8-EQN8-02J6-2RXK.
  • Dowd, K. (2009). Moral hazard and the financial crisis. Cato Journal, 29(1), 141–166. Feldman, Y., & Kaplan, Y. (2019). Behavioral ethics as compliance. Forthcoming, Cam- bridge handbook of compliance (Van Rooij & Sokol Eds.). Bar Ilan University Faculty of Law. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3458582 Research Paper No. 19-18.
  • Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781849208826. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stake- holder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1080/ 19416520.2010.495581.
  • Gonzalez, L. O., Santomil, P. D., & Herrera, A. T. (2020). The effect of enterprise risk man- agement on the risk and the performance of Spanish listed companies. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 26(3), 111–120. doi:10.1016/j. iedeen.2020.08.002.
  • Gonzalo, J. F., San-Jose, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2021). Moral compliance as facilitator for ethical reflection in management: Catalysts and situations. Total Quality Manage- ment & Business Excellence, 32(9/10), 1106–1121 https://dx.doi.org/10.1080 /14783363.2019.1668263.
  • Hagerty, J., Hackbush, J., Gaughan, D., & Jacobson, S. (2008). E-governance, risk manage- ment, and compliance spending report, 2008-2009. Inside $GRCMarket. Boston, USA: AMR Research.
  • Harrison, J. S., Phillips, R. A., & Freeman, R. E. (2020). On the 2019 business roundtable “statement on the purpose of a corporation. Journal of Management, 46(7), 1223– 1237. doi:10.1177/0149206319892669.
  • Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of enterprise risk management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822.
  • International Organization for Standardization (2018). Risk management — Guidelines (ISO 31000), https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:ISo:31000:ed-2:v1: Accessed, 18 July 2020.
  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objec- tive function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21. doi:10.2307/ 3857812.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305– 360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
  • Kaptein, M. (2019). The moral entrepreneur: A new component of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(4), 1135–1150. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3641-0.
  • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Education and debate qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. Sociology of Health, 311, 299–302. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 Educa- tion and debate Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups.
  • Krugman, P. (2009). The return of the depression. Economy and the crisis of 2008. Sofia, East-West.
  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
  • Marsden, C. (2000). The new corporate citizenship of big business: Part of the solution to sustainability? Business and Society Review, 105(1), 8–25. doi:10.1111/0045- 3609.00062.
  • Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
  • Miller, G. P. (2017). The law of governance, risk management, and compliance. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
  • O'Brien, J. (2006). Ethics and corporate governance: Banking on scandal. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 2(1−2), 183–196. doi:10.1504/ IJBGE.2006.009416.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3, 344–347.
  • Pauly, M. V. (1968). The economics of moral hazard: Comment. The American Economic Review, 58(3), 531–537.
  • Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3/ 4), 260–271. doi:10.1108/01409171211210154.
  • Salguero-Caparros, F., Pardo-Ferreira, M. C., Martínez-Rojas, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2020). Management of legal compliance in occupational health and safety. a literature review. Safety Science, 121, 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.033.
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1983). Risk, incentives and insurance: The pure theory of moral hazard. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 8(1), 4–33. doi:10.1057/gpp.1983.2.
  • Summers, L. (2007). Beware moral hazard fundamentalists. Financial Times (23 Sep- tember).
  • Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582–603. doi:10.2307/2392581.
  • Takemoto, Y., & Arizono, I. (2020). Moral hazard problem and collaborative coordination in supply chain with capacity reservation contract. International Jour- nal of Production Research, 58(8), 2510–2526. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019. 1633027.
  • Trevino, L. K., Weaver, G. R., Gibson, D. G., & Toffler, B. L. (1999). Managing ethics and legal compliance: What works and what hurts. California Management Review, 41 (2), 131–151. doi:10.2307/41165990.
  • Tuttle, B., Harrell, A., & Harrison, P. (1997). Moral hazard, ethical considerations, and the decision to implement an information system. Journal of Management Informa- tion Systems, 13(4), 7–27. doi:10.1080/07421222.1997.11518140.
  • Urionabarrenetxea, S., San-Jose, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2016). Negative equity companies in Europe: Theory and evidence. Business: Theory and Practice, 17(4), 307–316. doi:10.3846/btp.17.11125.
  • Velasco, G. E., Gondra, J. M., Moneva, J. M., & Rivero, P. (2005). Responsabilidad social corporativa: Aspectos jurídico-economicos. Castello de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet