Predicting 30-Day Emergency Readmission Risk

  1. Arkaitz Artetxe 12
  2. Andoni Beristain 12
  3. Manuel Graña 2
  4. Ariadna Besga 3
  1. 1 Vicomtech-IK4 Visual Interaction Communication Technologies
    info

    Vicomtech-IK4 Visual Interaction Communication Technologies

    San Sebastián, España

    ROR https://ror.org/0023sah13

  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  3. 3 Hospital Santiago Apostol
    info

    Hospital Santiago Apostol

    Vitoria, España

    ROR https://ror.org/023pqj155

Libro:
International Joint Conference SOCO’16-CISIS’16-ICEUTE’16: San Sebastián, Spain, October 19th-21st, 2016 Proceedings
  1. Manuel Graña (coord.)
  2. José Manuel López-Guede (coord.)
  3. Oier Etxaniz (coord.)
  4. Álvaro Herrero (coord.)
  5. Héctor Quintián (coord.)
  6. Emilio Corchado (coord.)

Editorial: Springer Suiza

ISBN: 978-3-319-47364-2 3-319-47364-6 978-3-319-47363-5 3-319-47363-8

Año de publicación: 2017

Páginas: 3-12

Congreso: International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems (9. 2016. San Sebastián)

Tipo: Aportación congreso

Resumen

Objective: Predicting Emergency Department (ED) readmissions is of great importance since it helps identifying patients requiring further post-discharge attention as well as reducing healthcare costs. It is becoming standard procedure to evaluate the risk of ED readmission within 30 days after discharge. Methods. Our dataset is stratified into four groups according to the Kaiser Permanente Risk Stratification Model. We deal with imbalanced data using different approaches for resampling. Feature selection is also addressed by a wrapper method which evaluates feature set importance by the performance of various classifiers trained on them. Results. We trained a model for each scenario and subpopulation, namely case management (CM), heart failure (HF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes mellitus (DM). Using the full dataset we found that the best sensitivity is achieved by SVM using over-sampling methods (40.62 % sensitivity, 78.71 % specificity and 71.94 accuracy). Conclusions. Imbalance correction techniques allow to achieve better sensitivity performance, however the dataset has not enough positive cases, hindering the achievement of better prediction ability. The arbitrary definition of a threshold-based discretization for measurements which are inherently is an important drawback for the exploitation of the data, therefore a regression approach is considered as future work.