Factores determinantes de una renta básica a través del análisis del consumo familiar

  1. Peña Miguel, Noemí 1
  2. de la Peña Esteban, J. Iñaki 1
  3. Fernández–Sainz, Ana 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
SOCIAL REVIEW: International Social Sciences Review / Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 2695-9755

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Alea: 2

Zenbakia: 2

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.37467/GKA-REVSOCIAL.V2.1232 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: SOCIAL REVIEW: International Social Sciences Review / Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales

Garapen Iraunkorreko Helburuak

Laburpena

The main advances in models of compulsory social security have taken place in social and economical conflictive situations. In these situations have been developed the first pillar schemes (International Labour Organization, ILO). In 2005 the World Bank proposed to design an assignment for every citizen, paid annually, according to their own situation, taking into account also both demographic and economic situation of the country. This economic assignment is according to the concept of basic social assistance benefit understood as an initial and basic social protection system to guarantee vital expenses of all citizens. This paper analyse the factors that determine the amount of expenses in essential needs of individuals. Thus, we have used Spanish Household Budget Survey (2010) and analysed the factors (number of family members, number of dependents, region of residence, household head features, etc.) that determine essential needs applying a quantile regression. The regression result is then used to provide a basic income (BI) proposal for each household type. The aim of this study is to determinate the amount of basic social assistance benefit which could protect citizens from social risks and resulting insecurities covering essential needs using those factors. Therefore, a social security benefit as basic social assistance one would be a powerful tool against poverty and inequality. As its main purpose is to meet the essential needs of individuals, then it could be used as a measure to guarantee a basic level of social and economic security for all members of society of the current minimum income grants and other benefits.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Asp, E. H. (1999). “Factors affecting food decisions made by individual consumers’’. Food Policy, 24, 287-94.
  • Adema, W. (2006). “Social assistance policy development and the provision of a decent level of incomes in selected OECD countries”. OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, 38. Paris: OECD.
  • Albert, C. y Davia, M. (2009). “Monetary poverty, education exclusion and material deprivation amongst youth in Spain”. Alcamentos nº 0903.
  • Aldas, J., F. Goerlich y M. Mas (2006): Gasto de las familias en las Comunidades autónomas españolas (1998-2002): Pautas de consumo, desigualdad y convergencia. CIEF (Centro de Investigación Económica y Financiera): Fundación Caixa Galicia.
  • Ando, A. y Modigliani, F. (1957). “Test of the Life-Cycle Hypothesis of savings: comments and suggestions”. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics , 19.
  • Bandrés, E. (2012). “La aritmética del Estado de bienestar en España”. Ekonomiaz , 81. 3º cuatrimestre.
  • Beramendi, P. (2012). The political geography of inequality. Regions and Redistribution. Cambridge Universty Press.
  • Bleichmar, H. (1977). Enciclopedia de Psiquiatria , 1º edición. Ed. El Ateneo.
  • Buchinsky, M. (1998). “Recent Advances in Quantile Regression Models: A Practical Guideline for Empirical Research”. Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 88-126
  • Camacho J. y Hernández, M. (2008). “Detección e influencia de los principales factores explicativos del consumo familiar de servicios en España y sus regiones”. Revista de estudios Regionales , 82, 185-209, mayo-agosto.
  • Clark, D. (2005). “Sen´s Capability Approach and the Many Spaces of Human Well-being”. The Jorunal of Develoment Studies, 41(8). 1139-1368, November.
  • Coulter, F., Cowell, F., Jenkins, S. (1992 a). “Differences in Needs and Assesment of Income Distributions”. Bulletin of Economic Research , 44, 77-124.
  • European Parliament (2010). “Role of minimun income in combating poverty and promoting an inclusive society in Europe”. European Parliament resolution 2010/2039 (INI).
  • EUROSTAT (2013). Glossary:Classification of individual consumption by purpose (COICOP).
  • Figari, F., Matsaganis, M. y Sutherland, H. (2013). “Are European social safety neds tight enough?. Coverage and adequacy of Minimun Income schemes in 14 EU countries.” International Journal of Social Welfare , 22: 3-14.
  • Frazer, H. y Marlier, E. (2009). Minimum income schemes across EU member states: Synthesis report. EU Network of National Independent Experts on Social Inclusion . Brussels: European Commission.
  • Goerlich, F. J., Lasso de la Vega, M. C. & Urrutia, A. M. (2009): “The extended Atkinson family and changes in the expenditure distribution: Spain 1973/74-2003”. Journal of Income Distribution, 18(1): 20-41.
  • Gough, I., Bradshaw, J., Dich, J., Eardley, T. & Whiteford, P. (1997). “Social assistance in OECD Countries.” Journal of European Social Policy , 7 (1): 17-43.
  • Guio, A (2005): "Material deprivation in the EU". En EUROSTAT.Statistics in Focus. Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas. Luxemburgo.
  • — (2006). “Material deprivation and poor housing” What can be learned from the EU-SILC 2004 data? How can EU-SILC be improved in this matter? Present in “comparative EU Statistics on Income and Living conditions: issues and challenges”. Helsinki, November.
  • Holzmann R. y Hinz, R. (2005). Old-Age Income Support in the 21st Century. An International Perspective on Pension Systems and Reform , Banco Mundial.
  • Immervoll, H. (2012). “Minimum-income benefits uin OECD countries: Policy design, effectiveness and challenges”. En D. J. Besharov & K. Couch (Eds.), Counting the poor: New thinking about European poverty measures and lessons for the Unites States (pp. 171-210). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • INE (2010). HBS. Household Budget Survey microdata 2010.
  • — (2012). Household Budget Survey methodology.
  • Johansson, F. (2007). Essays on measurement error and nonresponse. Economic Studies, 103. Uppsala: Uppsala University
  • Koenker R., Bassett, Jr (1978) “Regression Quantiles”. Econometrica, 46(1). January.
  • Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. (2001). “Quantile regression (Electronic version)”. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 143-156.
  • Laparra, M. (2010): “Los huecos de la protección social en España”, en M. Laparra y Perez Eransus: El primer impacto de la crisis en la cohesión social en España. Fundación FOESSA.
  • Maslow, A. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review.
  • Menger, C. (1997). Principios de Economía Política. Unión Editorial, S.A.
  • Meyer, B., Mok, W. & Sullivan J. X. (2009). The under-reporting of transfers in household surveys: its nature and consequences. NBER Working Paper, 1518. Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic research.
  • Nelson, K. (2010). “Social assistance and minimum income benefits in old and new democracies”. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(4): 365-378.
  • Noguera, J. A. & Raventós, D. (2004). “Basic Income, Social Polarization and the right to work”, en G. Standing, Promoting Income Security as a right: Europe and North Amercia, Anthem Press, London.
  • Pinilla, R. & Sanzo, L. (2004). “Introducing a Basic Income system in Spain. Feasibility and cost”. Paper presented in 10th BIEN Congress, Barcelona, September, 19-20.
  • Pinilla, R. (2006). “Más allá del bienestar”. La renta básica de la ciudadanía como innovación social basada en la evidencia. Icaria Editorial, S.A.
  • Raventós, D. (2007). Basic Income: The material conditions of freedom. Pluto Press.
  • Regidor E., Calle, M. E., Navarro, P., et al. (2003). “Trends in the association between average income, poverty and income inequality and life expectancy in Spain”. Soc. Sci. Med., 56961–971.971.
  • Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Roemer, J. E., R. Aaberge, U. Colombio, J. Fritzell, S. Jenkins, A. Lefranc, I. Marx, M. Page, E. Pommer, J. Ruiz-Castillo, M. J. San Segundo, T. Tranaes, A. Trannoy, G. Wagner and I. Zubiri (2003). “To What Extent do fiscal regimes equalize opportunities for income acquisition among citizens?”. Journal of Public Economics. 87, 539-565.
  • Standing, G (ed) (2004). Promoting Income Security as a right: Europe and North America. Anthem Press, London.
  • Storms, B. y Van Den Bosch, K. (2009). What income do families need for social participation at the minimun? A budget standard for Flanders? UA/Berichten, Antwerp, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy.
  • Van Mechelen, N., Marchal, S., Goedemé, T., Marx, I. & Cantillon, B. (2011). The CSBMinimum Income protection Indicators dataset (CSB-MIPI). CSB Working paper 11/05. Antewerp: University of Antwerp.
  • Van Parijs, P. (1994); “Au delá de la solidarité. Les fondements éthiques del’état-providence et de son dépassement”. Futuribles 184.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet