(Des)cortesía verbal y caracterización en el tercer Mimiambo de Herodas

Referencias bibliográficas

• Bailly, Anatole (1950), Dictionnaire grec français, Paris, Hachette.
• Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca (20092), «Face», en J.L. Mey (ed.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Oxford, Elsevier: 261-263.
• Barrios-Lech, Peter (2016), Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy, Cambridge, CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316416983; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316416983
• Battezzato, Luigi (2012), «The language of Sophocles», en A. Markantonatos (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Sophocles, Leiden-Boston, Brill: 305-324. DOI: 10.1163/9789004217621_017; https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217621_017
• Berger, Lukasz (2017a), «Estrategias de la cortesía positiva en la apertura dialógica en Plauto y Terencio», Revista de Estudios Latinos 17: 11-35.
• Berger, Lukasz (2017b). «The old man and Linguistic Politeness in the comedies of Plautus», SPhP 27(3): 249-273. DOI: 10.14746/sppgl.2017.XXVII.3.14, https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2017.XXVII.3.14
• Bousfield, Derek (2008), Impoliteness in Interaction, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.167; https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167
• Brown, H. Paul (2006), «Addressing Agamemnon: A Pilot Study of Politeness and Pragmatics in the Iliad», TAPhA 136(1): 1-46.
• Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987), Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use, Cambridge, CUP.
• Caffi, Claudia (2007), Mitigation, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
• Catrambone, Marco (2016), «Off-record politeness in Sophocles: The patterned dialogues of female characters», Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 12(2): 173-196.
• Cunningham, Ian C. (1971), Herodas. Mimiambi, Oxford, OUP.
• Cunningham, Ian C. (1987), Herodas. Mimiambi, Leipzig, Teubner.
• Conti Jiménez, Luz (en prensa), «La cortesía verbal en Sófocles: análisis del optativo potencial en actos de habla directivos I».
• Culpeper, Jonathan (1996), «Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness», Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349-367. DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3; https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
• Culpeper, Jonathan (2001), Language and Characterisation: People in plays and other texts, Harlow, Longman.
• Culpeper, Jonathan (2005), «Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link», Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1(1): 35-72. DOI: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35; https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
• Culpeper, Jonathan (2011), Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence, Cambridge, CUP.
• Culpeper, Jonathan (2016), «Impoliteness Strategies», en A. Capone & J. L. Mey (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, Cham, Springer: 421-445. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_16
• Culpeper, Jonathan & Hardaker, Claire (2017), «Impoliteness», en J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Kádár (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, London, Palgrave Macmillan: 199-226.
• Denizot, Camille (2011), Donner des ordres en grec ancien: étude linguistique des formes de l'injonction, Mont-Saint-Aignan, Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre.
• Dickey, Eleanor (1996), Greek forms of address. From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford-Nueva York, OUP.
• Dickey, Eleanor (2009), «Latin influence and Greek request formulae», en T.V. Evans & D. Obbink (eds.), The Language of the Papyri, Oxford, OUP: 208-220.
• Dickey, Eleanor (2016), «Politeness in ancient Rome: can it help us evaluate modern politeness theories?», Journal of Politeness Research 12(2): 197-220. DOI: 10.1515/pr-2016-0008; https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0008
• Eelen, Gino (2001), Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester, St. Jerome Publishing.
• Emde Boas, Evert (2011), Linguistic studies in Euripides’ Electra, Universidad de Oxford (PhD thesis).
• Emde Boas, Evert (2017), Language and character in Euripides’ Electra, Oxford, OUP.
• Fornieles Sánchez, Raquel (en prensa), «La lítote como mecanismo de descortesía verbal en Esquines y Demóstenes», Exemplaria Classica.
• Fornieles Sánchez, Raquel (en preparación), «Una aproximación a la descortesía verbal en los insultos entre Esquines y Demóstenes».
• Goffman, Erving (1955), «On face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction», Psychiatry 18(3): 213-231. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008; https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
• Goffman, Erving (1967), Interaction Ritual, Chicago, Aldine Publishing Company.
• Hall, Jon (2009), Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters, Oxford, OUP.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1992), Les interactions verbales. II, Paris, Armand Colin.
• Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1994), Les interactions verbales. III, Paris, Armand Colin.
• Hoffmann, Maria E. (1987), Negatio Contrarii. A Study of Latin litotes, Assen, van Gorcum.
• Hoffmann, Maria E. (1989), «Litotes expressions in Latin», en G. Calboli (ed.), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Bologna, 1–5 April 1985, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 589-610. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.17.37hof; https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.17.37hof
• Lakoff, Robin (1973), «The Logic of Politeness; Or, Minding your P’s and Q’s», Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago, Linguistics Society: 292-305.
• Lakoff, Robin (1989), «The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse», Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 8(2-3): 101-130.
• Leech, Geoffrey (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London, Longman.
• Leech, Geoffrey (2014), The Pragmatics of Politeness, Oxford, OUP.
• LSJ = Liddell, Henry G., Scott, Robert & Jones, Henry S. (19409), Greek-English Lexicon, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
• Lloyd, Michael (2004), «The Politeness of Achilles. Off-Record Conversation Strategies in Homer and the Meaning of kertomia», JHS 124: 75-89.‬‬‬ DOI: 10.2307/3246151; https://doi.org/‬‬10.2307/3246151
• Lloyd, Michael (2006), «Sophocles in the Light of Face-Threat Politeness Theory», en A. Rijksbaron & I.J.F de Jong (eds.), Sophocles and the Greek Language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics, Leiden, Brill: 225-240.
• Lloyd, Michael (2009), «The Language of the Gods: Politeness in the Prologue of the Troades», en M. Lloyd, J. Cousland & J. Hume (eds.), The Play of Texts and Fragments: Essays in Honour of Martin Cropp, Leiden, Brill: 183-192.
• Lloyd, Michael (2012), «Sophocles the Ironist», en A. Markantonatos (ed.), Brill’s companion to Sophocles, Leiden, Boston: 563-577.
• Lloyd, Michael (2018), «The hortative aorist», CQ 68(2): 415-442. DOI: 10.1017/S0009838819000132; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838819000132
• McDonald, Katherine (2016), «The sociolinguistics of gender, social status and masculinity in Aristophanes», Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2(2): 155-188. DOI: 10.1515/jhsl-2016-0011; https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0011
• Meluzzi, Chiara (2017), «Diminutives in Ancient Greek: Intensification and subjectivity», en M. Napoli & M. Ravetto, Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins: 127-146. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.189.07mel; https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.07mel
• Navarro, José Luis (trad.) (1981), Herodas. Mimiambos. Fragmentos mímicos. Partenio de Nicea. Sufrimientos de amor, Madrid, Gredos.
• Poccetti, Paolo (2014), «Politeness & Courtesy Expressions», en G. K. Giannakis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, vol. 3, Leiden-Boston, Brill: 112-114. DOI: 10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_SIM_00000514; https://doi.org/10.1163/2214-448X_eagll_SIM_00000514
• Pontier, Pierre (2013), “The litotes of Thucydides”, en A. Tsakmakis & M. Tamiolaki (ed.), Thucydides Between History and Literature, Berlín: 352-370.
• Revuelta, Antonio (2017), «Illocutionary force and modality: how to tackle the issue in Ancient Greek», en C. Denizot, O. Spevak (coords.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, Amsterdam, John Benjamins: 17-44. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.190.02rev; https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.02rev
• Risselada, Rodie (1993), Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin. Ámsterdam, Brill.
• Roig, Catalina Monserrat (2015), «Otras perspectivas para el análisis lingüístico de Plauto: los vocativos insultantes en la reacción conversacional», Minerva 28: 133-161.
• Scodel, Ruth (2008), Epic Facework: Self-Presentation and Social Interaction in Homer, Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.
• Scodel, Ruth (2017), «The Individual Voice in Works and Days», en N.W. Slater (ed.), Voice and voices in Antiquity: Orality and Literacy in the Ancient World, Leiden-Boston, Brill: 74-91. DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X17002219; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X17002219
• Searle, John (1969), Speech Acts, Cambridge, CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173438; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
• Searle, John (1976), «A classification of illocutionary acts», Language in society (5)1: 1-24.
• Searle, John (1979), Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge, CUP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609213; https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213
• Shalev, Donna (2017), «Attenuated, modified, assent-seeking declaratives, interrogation and urbanitas in the Greek of Platonic dialogue», en F. Logozzo & P. Poccetti (eds.), Ancient Greek Linguistics: New Perspectives, Insights, and Approaches, Berlín-Boston, De Gruyter: 429-445. DOI: 10.1111/rsr.13589; https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.13589
• Sicking, C.M.J. (1993), «Appendix 3. που», en C.M.J. Sicking & J.M. van Ophuijsen, Two studies in Attic particle usage: Lysias and Plato, Leiden-Nueva York-Colonia: Brill: 57-64. DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00294687; https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X00294687
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2010), «La expresión del agradecimiento en la comedia latina», en P. Anreiter & M. Kienpointner (eds.), Latin Linguistics today. Proceedings of the XVth International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Innsbruck, Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft: 625-637.
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2014), «La politesse linguistique en latin: bilan d’une étude en cours», Dictionnaire Historique et Encyclopédie Linguistique du Latin, Partie IV : Encyclopédie Linguistique, Paris, Sorbonne. http://www.linglat.paris-sorbonne.fr/encyclopedie_linguistique:notions_linguistiques:syntaxe:formules_de_politesse
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2016a), «Congratulations in Latin Comedy: Types and functions», Journal of Politeness Research 12(2): 267-290. DOI: 10.1515/pr-2016-0005; https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0005
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2016b), «La respuesta al agradecimiento en la comedia de Plauto y Terencio», Pallas 102: 229-236. DOI: 10.4000/pallas.3716; https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.3716
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2017) «Estrategias de cortesía lingüística en Querolus», Latomus 76: 140-161. DOI: 10.2143/LAT.76.1.3275170; https://doi.org/10.2143/LAT.76.1.3275170
• Unceta Gómez, Luis (2019), «La contribución de la Pragmática al análisis de la dinámica escénica. El caso de Mostellaria», en R. López Gregoris (ed.), Drama y Dramaturgia en la Escena Romana. III Encuentro Internacional de Teatro Latino, Zaragoza, Libros Pórtico: 295-298.
• Watts, Richard J. (2003), Politeness, Cambridge, CUP.
• Watts, Richard J. (2005 [1992]), «Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis? », en R.J. Watts, S. Id &, K. Ehlich (eds.), Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Berlín-Nueva York, Mouton de Gruyter: xi-xlvii.
• Willi, Andreas (2003), The languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of linguistic variation in Classical Attic Greek, Oxford, OUP.