Bidegurutzeak eta zirrikituak. Zientzia-hezitzaile feministen optikak eta praktikak hausnarketagai

  1. Albizu Mallea, Uzuri 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

ISSN: 0214-9753

Año de publicación: 2021

Volumen: 33

Número: 1

Páginas: 9-41

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Tantak: Euskal Herriko Unibertsitateko hezkuntza aldizkaria

Resumen

The present paper takes the voices of six feminist science educators as a means to interro- gate systems of power within the worlds of science. It begins by highlighting the social and historical lo- catedness of scientific and gender systems as well as processes by which they have mutually constructed each other. It then describes and situates some of the experiences and discourses of feminist science edu- cators. It also identifies some effects these have had on their teaching praxis. Power is read as a construc- tive force, which argues for a centering of discourses and practices that confront and impact on the regu- lating norms of the worlds of science. For this reason, six feminist science educators are taken as expert witnesses on feminist interventions in science education. Results show that both position and positioning can be source of tension in worlds of science. The work delves into such conflicts and describes the im- pact that being a woman and a feminist has had on the interviewees’ scientific and teaching careers. As to future research, the paper concludes that narrowing the scope of the research to more specific dynamics and including students’ voices could further advance an ongoing process of reflection around this topic.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Anderson, E. (2012). Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Standford enciclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/
  • Bain, O. eta Cummings, W. (2000). Academe’s glass ceiling: Societal, professional-organizational, and institutional barriers to the career advancement of academic women. Comparative Education Review, 44(4), 493-513. or.
  • Banks, J. A. (1995). The historical reconstruction of knowledge about race: Implications for transformative teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(2), 15-25. or.
  • Banks, J. A. (1999). An introduction to multicultural education. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Berdintasunerako Zuzendaritza (2018). Igualdad en cifras. Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea. https://www.ehu.eus/documents/2007376/11324702/Igualdad-en-cifras.pdf/074d604f-b17c-42e6-bcba-44c65842afd2
  • Bianchini, J. A., Whitney, D. J., Breton, T. D. eta Hilton-Brown, B. A. (2001).Toward inclusive science education: University scientists’ views of students, instructional practices, and the nature of science. Science Education, 86(1), 42-78. or.
  • Bishop, A. (1990). Western mathematics: the secret weapon of cultural imperialism. Race & Class, 32(2), 51-65. or.
  • Blanco, Q., Egido, S. eta Aubinya, A. (2010). Reconstruyendo los hitos de la antropología. Con Teresa del Valle. Perifèria: revista de investigación y formación en antropología, 13, 1-26. or.
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (2000). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282-295. or.
  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversión of identity. Routledge.
  • Cipriani, N. eta Senovilla, J. (2019). Análisis de los fenómenos que contribuyen a perpetuar, o modificar, la discriminación de las mujeres en los campos de las matemáticas y la física. Emakunde.
  • Cooper, O. (2019). Where and what are the barriers to progression for female students and academics in UK Higher Education? Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 23(2-3), 93-100. or.
  • Damarin, S. (2008). Towards thinking feminism and mathematics together. Signs, 34(1), 101-123. or.
  • Esteban, M. L. (2008). Etnografía, itinerarios corporales y cambio social. Apuntes teóricos y metodológicos. In E. Imaz (arg.), La materialidad de la identidad (135-158 or.). Editorial Hariadna.
  • Esteban, M. L. (2009). Identidades de género, feminismo, sexualidad y amor: los cuerpos como agentes. Política y Sociedad, 46(1-2), 27-41. or.
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (2019). Graduko titulazioetan matrikulatutako ikasleak zientzia eremuen eta sexuaren arabera. http://www.ehu.eus/zenbakitan/eu/node/560.html
  • Federici, S. (2017). Caliban eta sorgina. Elkar argitaletxea eta Jakin fundazioa. (Jatorrizko idatziaren publikazio-urtea: 2004.)
  • Finkel, L., Parra, P. eta Bael, A. (2008). La entrevista abierta en investigación social: Trayectorias profesionales de ex deportistas de élite. In A. J. Gordo eta A. Serrano (arg.), Estrategias y prácticas cualitativas de investigación social (127-154 or.). Pearson Educación.
  • Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Itzul. A. M. Sheridan Smith. Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Prentice Hall.
  • Fox Keller, E. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. Yale University Press.
  • Frisby, C. M. (2017). A content analysis of Serena Williams and Angelique Kerber’s racial and sexist microagressions. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 263-281. or.
  • Gillis, M. T. eta Jacobs, A. T. (2017). Plato and same-sex sexuality. In M. T. Gillis eta A. T. Jacobs (arg.), Introduction to women’s and gender studies: An interdisciplinary approach. Oxford University Press.
  • Goñi, J. M. (2006). Introducción. In J. M. Goñi (arg.), Matemáticas e interculturalidad (5-6 or.). Graó.
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women. The reinvention of nature. Free Association Books.
  • Harding, S. (1991). whose Science? whose Knowledge? Cornell University Press.
  • hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress. Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
  • Jackson, J. M. (2019). Breaking out of the ivory tower: (Re)thinking inclusion of women and scholars of color in the academy. Journal of women, Politics & Policy, 40(1), 195-203. or.
  • Leathwood, C. (2004). A critique of institutional inequalities in higher education (or an alternative to hypocrisy for higher educational policy). Theory and Research Education, 2(1), 31-48. or.
  • Leathwood, C. eta Hey, V. (2009). Gender/ed discourses and emotional sub-texts: Theorising emotion in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4), 429-440. or.
  • Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason. ‘Male’ and ‘female’ in western philosophy. Methuen & Co.
  • Messer-Davidow, E. (1991). Know-How. In J. E. Hartman eta E. Messer-Davidow (arg.), (En)gendering knowledge (281-309 or.). The University of Tennesee Press.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. The National Academies Press.
  • O’Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. Sage Publications.
  • Ong, M., Smith, J. eta Ko, L. T. (2017). Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 206-245. or.
  • Perez-Sedeño, E. (2006). Las lógicas que nunca nos contaron (y las que nunca serán). Clepsydra, 5, 19-35. or.
  • Perez-Serrano, G. (1998). Investigación cualitativa: Retos e interrogantes. Técnicas y análisis de datos. La Muralla.
  • Real Academia Española (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española. Real Academia Española. https://dle.rae.es/?w=diccionario
  • Riegle-Crumb, C. eta King, B. (2015), Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656-664. or.
  • Sax, L. J., Lehman, K. J., Barthelemy, R. S. eta Lim, G. (2016). Women in physics: A comparison to science, technology, engineering, and math education over four decades. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1-17. or.
  • Sefyrin, J., Elovaara, P. eta Moertberg, C. (2018). Feminist technoscience as a resource for working with science practices, a critical approach, and gender equality in Swedish higher IT educations. In D. Kreps, C. Ess, L. Leenen eta K. Kimppa (arg.), This changes everything – ICT and climate change: what can we do? HCC13 2018. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 537, Springer, Cham.
  • Spanier, B. (2000). Transforming science curricula in higher education: Feminist contributions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6, 467-480. or.
  • Stinson, D. (2013). Negotiating sociocultural discourses: The counter-storytelling of academically (and mathematically) succesful African American male students. American Educational Research Journal 45(4), 975-1010. or.
  • Thuren, B. M. (1992). Del sexo al género, un desarrollo teórico, 1970-1990. Antropología, 2, 31-55. or.
  • Valles, M. S. (1999). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Editorial Síntesis.
  • Žižek, S. (1997). Multiculturalism, or, the cultural logic of multinational capitalism. New Left Review, 225, 28-51. or.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet