¿Qué significa hoy la idea de autonomía para la Biología?

  1. Moreno, Alvaro 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad del País Vasco
Journal:
Metatheoria

ISSN: 1853-2330,  1853-2322

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Special Volume - Philosophy of Biology in Iberoamerica - Part I

Volume: 8

Issue: 1

Pages: 157-168

Type: Article

DOI: 10.48160/18532330ME8.170 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Metatheoria

Abstract

Ever since Darwin, biology has been based on the idea of evolution through natural selection, and this in turn has deeply influenced our scientific and philosophical understanding of biological phenomena and our place in nature. This work explores why modern-day biology should advance towards an even more fundamental idea, namely that of autonomy. The idea of autonomy reflects the fact that living organisms are self-organized systems capable of self-production and self-maintenance, which establish themselves as integrated entities in order to set out their own objectives and rules and foster the conditions necessary for their existence through their interactions with the environment. Nevertheless, to date, the idea of biological autonomy has been understood more as self-sufficiency, something in tension with collective forms of organization. In contrast to this view, I will argue that we should develop an idea of autonomy that complements these collective forms, recognizing the importance and ubiquity of collaboration and symbiosis which, far from opposing the thesis defended here, require the very idea of autonomy in order to be properly understood.

Bibliographic References

  • Arnellos, A. y A.Moreno (2012), “How Functional Differentiation Originated in Prebiotic Evolution”, Ludus Vitalis20(37):1-23.
  • Arnellos A. y A. Moreno (2015), “Multicellular Agency: An Organizational View”, Biology & Philosophy30(3): 333-357.
  • Arnellos, A., Moreno, A. y K. Ruiz Mirazo (2014), “Organizational Requirements for Multicellular Autonomy: Insights from a Comparative Case Study”, Biology & Philosophy29(6): 851-584.
  • Barandiaran, X. y A. Moreno (2008), “Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior”, Adaptive Behavior16(5): 325-344.
  • Barandiaran X., Di Paolo, E. y M. Rohde (2009), “Defining Agency. Individuality, Normativity, Asymmetry and Spatio-Temporality in Action”, Journal of Adaptive Behavior17(5): 367-386.
  • Bich, A., Mossio, M., Ruiz-Mirazo, K. y A. Moreno (2015), “Biological Regulation: Controlling the System from Within”, Biology & Philosophy31(2): 237-265.
  • Bickhard, M. (2000), “Autonomy, Function, and Representation. Communication and Cognition”, Artificial Intelligence17(3-4):111-131.
  • Christensen, W. y C. Hooker (2000), “An Interactivist-Constructivist Approach to Intelligence: Self-Directed Anticipative Learning”, Philosophical Psychology13: 5-45.
  • Casado da Rocha, A. (ed.) (2014), Autonomía con otros, Madrid-México: Plaza y Valdés.
  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973), “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution”,American Biology Teacher35:125-129.
  • Hofstadter, D. (1979), Gödel, Escher, Bach. An Eternal Golden Braid, New York: Basic Books.
  • Hofstadter, D. (2007), I Am a Strange Loop, New York: Basic Books.
  • Kant ([1790] 1981), Critica del Juicio, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
  • Kauffman, S. (2000), Investigations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Maturana, H. y F. Varela (1980), Autopoiesis and Cognition. The Realization of the Living, Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Mayr, E. (1961), “Cause and Effect in Biology: Kinds of Causes, Predictability, and Teleology are Viewed by a Practicing Biologist”, Science134: 1501-1506.
  • Mossio, M. y A. Moreno (2010), “Organizational Closure in Biological Organisms”, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences32(2-3):269-288.
  • Mossio, M., Saborido C. y A. Moreno (2009), “An Organizational Account of Biological Functions”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science60: 813-841.
  • Moreno, A. y M. Mossio (2015), Biological Autonomy. A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry, Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Pattee, H. (1982), “Cell Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach to the Symbol-Matter Problem”, Cognition and Brain Theory4: 325-341.
  • Ruiz Mirazo, K. y A. Moreno (2004), “Basic Autonomy as a Fundamental Step in the Synthesis of Life”, Artificial Life10(3): 235-259.
  • Ruiz Mirazo, K., Peretó, J. y A. Moreno (2004), “A Universal Definition of Life: Autonomy and Open-Ended Evolution”, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere34(3): 323-346.
  • Ruiz Mirazo, K., Umerez, J. y A.Moreno (2008), “Enabling Conditions for Open-Ended Evolution”, Biology & Philosophy23(1): 67-85.
  • Ruiz Mirazo, K. y A. Moreno (2012), “Autonomy in Evolution: From Minimal to Complex Life”, Synthese185(1): 21-52.
  • Saborido, C., Mossio, M. y A. Moreno (2011), “Biological Organization and Cross-Generation Functions”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science62: 583-606.
  • Varela, F.J. (1979), Principles of Biological Autonomy, New York: Elsevier-North Holland.
Data source: Dialnet