La burocratización neoliberal de la participación ciudadana en España

  1. Martínez-Palacios, Jone 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/ Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, España
Aldizkaria:
Revista internacional de sociología

ISSN: 0034-9712

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Alea: 79

Zenbakia: 2

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.3989/RIS.2021.79.2.20.48 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista internacional de sociología

Laburpena

In view of the global participative turn that is registered in the so-called western democracies, this article aims to know the particular form that this turn takes in Spain. To this end, a genetic analysis of the institutionalisation of citizen participation in the country, between 1978 and 2017, is carried out. From this analysis is concluded the neoliberal trend of the participatory turn that is implemented in Spain. The text describes the three main movements that make up the diagnosis of the neoliberal participatory turn: 1) the naturalization of a topos with a mechanistic nature of the crisis of democracy; 2) the neoliberal bureaucratization of participation, and 3) the privatization of participation. The general lines of the three movements are explained, and the particular analysis of the second of them, the neoliberal bureaucratization of citizen participation, is described.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Baiocchi, G., y E. Ganuza. 2017. Popular Democracy. The Paradox of Participation. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Bezes, P. 2020. “Le nouveau phénomène bureaucratique: Le gouvernement par la performance entre bureaucratisation, marché et politique”. Revue française de science politique 70: 21-47.
  • Bherer, L. et al. 2017. Professionalization of Public Participation M. Gauthier y L. Simard. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1966. “Champ intellectuel et projet créateur”. Les Temps modernes 246: 865-906.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1997. “Le neoliberalisme comme revolution conservatrice”. Interventions 1961-2001: 349-355.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1999. “Le fonctionament du champ intellectual”. Regards sociologiques 17/18: 5-27.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2013. “Séminaires sur le concept de champs, 1972-975”. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 2013/5 200: 4-37.
  • Bourdieu, P. y L. Wacquant. 1998. “Sur les ruses de la raison impérialiste”. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 121: 109-118.
  • Boltanski, L. y E. Chiapello. 2002. El nuevo espíritu del capitalismo. Madrid: Akal.
  • Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos. New York: Zone Books.
  • Cardon, D. 2010. La démocratie Internet, promesses et limites. Paris: Seuil-La République des idées.
  • Chilvers, J. 2017. “Expertise, professionalization and reflexivity in mediating public participation”. Pp. 115- 138 in Professionalization of Public Participation, editado por L. Bherer, M. Gauthier y L. Simard. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Clarke J y J. Newman. 1997. The Managerial State. Power, Politics and Ideology in The Remaking of Social Welfare. Londres: Sage.
  • Fraser, N. y R. Jaeggi. 2019. Capitalismo. Una controversia desde la Teoría Crítica. Morata: A Coruña.
  • Gallie, W. B. 1955. “Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society”. Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aristotelian Society New Series 56: 167-198.
  • Ganuza, E. 2010. “Les origines des budgets participatifs”. Pp. 23-42, in La démocratie participative inachevée: Genèse, adaptations et diffusions Editado por MH Bacqué e Y. Sintomer. Saint-Etienne: Yves Michel.
  • Ganuza, E. y M. Fernández 2012. “El giro participativo de la administración”. Cuadernos de trabajo social 25: 333-343.
  • Harvey, D. 2014. Diecisiete contradicciones y el fin del capitalismo. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.
  • Hendriks, C. y L. Carson. 2008. “Can the market help the forum? Negotiating the commercialization of deliberative democracy”. Policy Science 41: 293-313.
  • Hibou, B. 2012. La bureacratisation du monde à’ l’ére néoliberale. Paris: La Découvérte.
  • Hüller, T. 2010. “Playground or Democratisation? New Participatory Procedures at the European Commission”. Swiss Political Science Review 161: 77-107.
  • Illich, I. 1975. Némesis médica. Barcelona: Barral editores.
  • Lascoumes, P. y P. Le Galès. 2005. “Introduction: L’action publique saisie par ses instruments”. Pp. 11-44 in Gouverner par les instruments, editado por P. Lascoumes. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  • Lawrence, T. B. y R. Suddaby. 2006. “Institutions and institutional work”. Pp. 215-254 in The SAGE handbook of organization studies, editado por S. Clegg et al. Londres: Sage Publications.
  • Lee, C. 2015. Do-It-Yourself Democracy: The rise of the public engagement industry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Navarro, C. 1999. El sesgo participativo. Madrid: CSIC.
  • Martínez-Palacios. 2021. El giro participativo neoliberal. Leioa: UPV/EHU servicio editorial.
  • Mazeaud, A. y M. Nonjon. 2018. Le marché de la démocratie participative. Paris: Editions du croquant.
  • Nonjon, M. 2005. “Professionnels de la participation: savoir gérer son image militante”. Politix, vol. 70: 89-112.
  • Ramió, C. 2016. “Una propuesta de postburocracia: Un modelo burocrático y empresarial”. GIGAPP Working Papers 13: 1-32.
  • Slobodian, Q. 2018. Globalist. The end of Empire and the Birth of neoliberalism. USA: Harvard.
  • Tholen, B. 2015. “Citizen participation and bureaucratization: the participatory turn seen through a Weberian lens”. International Review of Administrative Sciences 81: 585-603.
  • Young, I.M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet