Arrazonamendu analogikoa fisika modernoaninbariantza eta simetria

  1. Ulazia, Alain
Journal:
Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

ISSN: 1577-9424

Year of publication: 2009

Volume: 9

Issue: 1

Pages: 111-118

Type: Article

More publications in: Gogoa: Euskal Herriko Unibersitateko hizkuntza, ezagutza, komunikazio eta ekintzari buruzko aldizkaria

Abstract

In this critical notice we discuss the rale of analogical reasoning in some important fields of modern physics. We do that by analyzing the heuristic relevance of invariance and symmetry, especially of the latter, following van Fraassen's epistemological formulation ofthe Symmetry Principies.

Bibliographic References

  • Barwise, Jon and John Perry(1981), «Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations». In P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in the Philosophy of Language, vol. VI. Minneapolis: University of Minnessota Press.
  • Clement, J. J. (2008), Creative Model Construction in Scientists and Students: The Role of Imagery, Analogy, and Mental Simulation. London: Springer.
  • Gruber, Howard E. (1974), Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity. New York: Dutton.
  • Henneaux, M. and C. Teitelboim (1992), Quantization of Gauge Systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Hodges, Wilfrid (2001), «Tarski’s truth definitions». In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. See: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/
  • Gloyd, G.E.R. (1966), Polarity and Analogy. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989): Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Winnie, J. A. (1986), «Invariants and objectivity: a theory with applications to relativity and geometry». In R. G. Colodny (ed.), From Quarks to Quasars: Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 71-180 or.