Diffractive Interfacesla difracción como metodología de investigación artística

  1. Belsunces, Andreu 1
  2. Benítez Valero, Laura 2
  3. Brandstätter, Ulrich 3
  4. Escudero, César 3
  5. Lamoncha, Fabricio 3
  6. Pin, Paula 3
  7. Tomás, Enrique 3
  1. 1 BAU, Centro Universitario de Diseño de Barcelona
  2. 2 EINA Centre Universitari de Disseny i Art Barcelona Catalunya
  3. 3 University of Art and Design of Linz, Interface Culture, AT
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Artnodes: revista de arte, ciencia y tecnología

ISSN: 1695-5951

Year of publication: 2017

Issue Title: Art and Research

Issue: 20

Type: Article

DOI: 10.7238/A.V0I20.3136 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Artnodes: revista de arte, ciencia y tecnología

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The abundance of methods of artistic experimentation is a reality that requires alternative methodologies for their study and evaluation. ‘Diffractive Interfaces’ is a research approach that focuses on the relationship between art and teaching, enabling dynamic interaction be­tween agencies through experimentation through different relational patterns and possibilities, facilitating the search for other ways of (re)presentation and gestural movement within the context of cultural interfaces. Both the work processes and the results of ‘Diffractive Interfaces’ are characterized by an interdisciplinary procedure of appropriation and interaction between scientific and artistic research through the use of technology, biology, sociology, critique, music, art and philosophy.

Bibliographic References

  • AKRICH, M; LATOUR, B. (1992). «A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies». En: W. BIJKER y J. LAW (eds.). Shaping Technology/Building Society Studies in Sociotecnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press. Págs. 259-264.
  • ANDERSEN, C.; POLD, S. B. (2011). Interface criticism: Aesthetics beyond the buttons. Aarhus: University Press.
  • BARAD, K. (2011). «Nature’s queer performativity». Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences. N.º 19(2), págs. 121-158.
  • BARAD, K. (2003) «Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter». Signs: Journal of women in culture and society 28.3. Págs. 801-831.
  • BARAD K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • BISHOP C. (2012). «Pedagogic Projects: How do you bring a classroom to life as if it were a work of art?». En: Artificial Hells, participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Londres: Verso. Págs. 41-76.
  • BORGDORFF, H. (2012). The Production of Knowledge in Artistic Research. The Conflict of the Faculties Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
  • BUSCH, K. (2009). «Artistic research and the poetics of knowledge». Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods. N.º 2, págs. 1-7.
  • CAMNITZER, L. (2007). «The Input of Pedagogy». En: Conceptualism in Latin American Art: Didactics of Liberation. Austin: University of Texas Press. Págs. 109–15.
  • COMBES, M. (2013). Gilbert Simondon and the Philosohpy of the Transindividual. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • COOKE, M. (1999). «Mediterranean Thinking: From Netizen to Medizen». Geographical Review. Vol. 89, n.º 2, ISSN 1931-0846, p. 290-300. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/216093>
  • FREIRE, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Nueva York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
  • FEYERABEND, P. (2003). Tratado contra el método. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • GALLOWAY, A. R. (2012). The interface effect. Polity.
  • GOLD, M. K. (2012). Debates in the digital humanities. U. of Minnesota Press.
  • HANNULA, M. (ed.) (2005). Artistic Research – Theories Methods and Practices. Marchtrenk: Peter Lang.
  • HARAWAY, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second _Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Oxon: Routledge.
  • HEIDEGGER, M. (2003). Ser y tiempo. Madrid: Trotta.
  • IHDE, D. (1992). Bodies in Technology, Electronic Mediations (5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • KLEIN, J. (2010). «What is Artistic Research?». JAR, Journal for Artistic Research, Originally published in German at Gegenworte. N.º 23. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  • KNOWLES, J. G.; COLE, A. L. (2008). The Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
  • MANOVICH, L. (2002). The Language of New Media. (Leonardo Book Series.) Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • NORMAN, D. (1999). The Invisible Computer. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • PARIKKA, J. (2012). «La nueva materialidad del polvo». En: Jamie ALLEN (coord.). «La materia de los medios» [nodo en línea]. Artnodes. N.º 12, págs. 24-29. UOC [Fecha de consulta: dd/mm/aa]. <http://artnodes.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/artnodes/article/view/n12-parikka/ n12-parikka-es> DOI: <http://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i12.1716>
  • POLD, S. (2005) «Interface Realisms: The Interface as Aesthetic Form». Post-Modern Culture 15 Electronic Journal, 2005. <http://pmc. iath.virginia.edu/issue.105/15.2pold.html> [Fecha de consulta: 14/09/2017]
  • POPPER, K. (1985). La lógica de la investigación científica. Madrid: Tecnos.
  • VAN DER TUIN, I.; DOLPHIJN, R. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Open Humanities Press.
  • VAN DER TUIN, I. (2014) «Diffraction as a methodology for feminist onto-epistemology: On encountering Chantal Chawaf and posthuman interpellation». Parallax. N.º 20.3 (2014), págs. 231-244.
Data source: Dialnet