Conceptual Basis for William Wordsworth’s Rejection to Science. Computational Analysis of the Lexicon in The Prelude

  1. Jiménez Pazos, Bárbara 1
  1. 1 University of Leeds
    info

    University of Leeds

    Leeds, Reino Unido

    ROR https://ror.org/024mrxd33

Journal:
Revista de Humanidades Digitales

ISSN: 2531-1786

Year of publication: 2019

Issue: 4

Pages: 40-56

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5944/RHD.VOL.4.2019.24395 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de Humanidades Digitales

Abstract

Much of the literary criticism devoted to interpreting the work of W. Wordsworth tries, on the one hand, to overcome and moderate, or, on the other hand, to directly accept the manifest opposition against science and scientific practices that the poet maintains, mainly throughout his work The Prelude. I will examine the conceptual basis of such hostile attitude by digitally analyzing the lexicon used in this work. The results obtained permit confirming Wordsworth’s hostility towards science, and more precisely, the prejudice that modern science would not allow a humanized perception of nature. But I argue that this attitude is due to a latent enchanted worldview, in a Weberian sense, more suitable for the sentimental description than for the perception and description of the natural landscape based on the explanatory knowledge of nature.

Bibliographic References

  • Austin, F. (1989). The Language of Wordsworth and Coleridge. London: Macmillan.
  • Bewell,A. (2017).Natures in Translation: Romanticism and Colonial Natural History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Bonacina,L. W. C. (1944). Wordsworth and Science. Nature,153, 716.
  • Bush, D. (1950). Science and English Poetry: A Historical Sketch, 1590-1950. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cooper,L. (1911). A Concordance to the Poems of William Wordsworth. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  • Da, N.Z.(2019). The Computational Case against Computational Literary Studies. Critical Inquiry, 45(3), 601-639.
  • Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the Rainbow: Science,Delusion and the Appetite for Wonder. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Durrant, G. (1970). Wordsworth and the Great System: A Study of Wordsworth's Poetic Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Evans, B. I. (1954). Literature and Science. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Gane, N. (2002). Max Weber and Postmodern Theory: Rationalization versus Re-enchantment. New York: Palgrave.
  • Garstang, W. (1926). Wordsworth’s Interpretation of Nature. Nature, 117(2933), 1-8.
  • Gaull, M. (1979). From Wordsworth to Darwin: ‘On to the Fields of Praise’. Wordsworth Circle, 10(1), 33-48. 55
  • Gaull, M. (2015). Wordsworth and Science. In R. Gravil&D. Robinson(Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of William Wordsworth(pp. 599-613). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gries, S. T.(2015). Some Current Quantitative Problems in Corpus Linguistics and a Sketch of Some Solutions. Language and Linguistics, 16(1), 93-117.
  • Holmes, R.(2009). The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beautyand Terror of Science. London: Harper Press.
  • Hoey, M., Mahlberg, M., Stubbs, M.&Teubert, W. (2007). Text, Discourse and Corpora. Theory and Analysis. New York: Continuum.
  • Hughes-Hallett, P. (2000). The Immortal Dinner. London: Viking.
  • Jeffrey, L. N. (1967). Wordsworth and Science. South Central Bulletin, 27(4), 16-22.
  • Jiménez Pazos, B. (2016). Imagen del Mundo, Percepción y Descripción de la Naturaleza. Un Estudio Comparado en torno a las Presuposiciones Onto-epistemológicas en la Poesía Romántica Inglesa y la Prosa Científica de Charles Darwin(Worldview, Perception and Description of Nature. A Comparative Study on the Onto-epistemological Presuppositions in English Romantic Poetry and the Scientific Prose of Charles Darwin). (Tesis Doctoral). Universidad del País Vasco, San Sebastián.
  • Keats, J. (1978). The Poems of John Keats(J. Stillinger, Ed.). Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Kontos, A. (1994). The World Disenchanted And The Return Of Gods And Demons. In A. Horowitz&T. Maley (Eds.), The Barbarism of Reason: Max Weber and the Twilight of Enlightenment(pp. 223-247). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Koshul, B. B. (2005). The Postmodern Significance of Max Weber’s Legacy: Disenchanting Disenchantment. New York: Palgrave.
  • Mackie, A. (1906). Nature Knowledge in Modern Poetry. London: The Aberdeen University Press.
  • Manier, E. (1978). The Young Darwin and his Cultural Circle. Studies in the History of Modern Science, Vol. 2. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co.
  • Marquard, O. (1986). Apoligie des Zufälligen. Stuttgart: Reclam.
  • McEnery, T.&Hardie, A.(2011).Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McIntyre, D. &Walker, B. (2019). Corpus Stylistics. Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Mill, J. S. (1897). What is Poetry?.In J. W. M. Gibbs (Ed.),Early Essays(pp. 201-217). London: George Bell and Sons.
  • Nichols, A.(2005). Roaring Alligators and Burning Tygers: Poetry and Science from William Bartram to Charles Darwin. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,149(3), 304-315.
  • O’Connor, R.(2007). The Earth on Show: Fossils and the Poetics of Popular Science, 1802-1856. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Pacho, J. (2005). Positivismo y Darwinismo. Madrid: Akal.
  • Plumly, S. (2014). The Immortal Evening: A Legendary Dinner with Keats, Wordsworth, and Lamb. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Schroeder, R.(1992). Max Weber and the Sociology of Culture. London: Sage Publications.
  • Scott, M.(2017). WordSmith Tools,version 7. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.
  • Semino, E.&Short, M.(2004). Corpus Stylistics. Spreech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge.
  • Turner, J.(1990). Wordsworth and Science. Critical Survey, 2(1). Science and the Nineteenth Century, 21-28.
  • Valenza, R. (2009). Literature, Language, and the Rise of the Intellectual Disciplines in Britain, 1680-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Weber, M. (2004).Science as a Vocation. In D. Owen & T. B. Strong (Eds.), R. Livingstone(Trans.),The Vocation Lectures(pp.1-31). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing company.
  • Whitehead, A. N.(2011). Science and the Modern World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wordsworth, W. & de Sélincourt, E. (Eds.) (1928). The Prelude,or Growth of a Poet’s Mind. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Wordsworth, W.&Hutchinson, T. (Eds.) (1975).Wordsworth: Poetical Works. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Wordsworth, W. & Sheats, P. D. (Eds.) (1982). The Complete Poetical Works of Wordsworth. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Wyatt, J. (1995). Wordsworth and the Geologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.