La implementación del tratamiento integrado de lenguaspercepciones del profesorado de educación primaria y secundaria.

  1. Miren Ibarluzea Santisteban 1
  2. Eneko Zuloaga San Román 1
  3. María del Mar Boillos Pereira 1
  4. Nora Aranberri Monasterio 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Journal:
Tonos digital: revista de estudios filológicos

ISSN: 1577-6921

Year of publication: 2021

Issue: 40

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Tonos digital: revista de estudios filológicos

Abstract

The Integrated Treatment of Languages (ITL) has gained attention in multilingual communities such as the Basque. Its aim is to design curricular programs that involve the different agents in the school context responsible for the teaching and use of languages. The methodological challenge lies in generating didactic interventions that enable the transfer of knowledge between languages and that enhance the development of students’ communicative competence in all their languages. The aim of this study is to categorize and describe the perceptions of teachers on the implementation of the ITL and, for that purpose, data has been collected from 60 in-service teachers of Primary and Secondary Education of the Basque Autonomous Community. They were involved in an online course on ITL and participated in a discussion forum. They produced a SWOT matrix where they indicated their perceptions about the implementation of this approach. The ideas provided by the teachers about the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the ITL were classified and categorized according to different areas of the school environment. Precisely, in this work, we have described those related to the category Teachers. In general, it can be concluded that teachers are more concerned with issues related to time management and interpersonal relationships among them, than with the pedagogical principles of ITL. No relevant differences were found in terms of the ideas contributed by Primary and Secondary teachers. All in all, the analysis carried out in this work helped to identify future paths for teacher training and improved management.

Bibliographic References

  • Arocena, M. E. (2017). Multilingual education: Teachers' beliefs and language use in the classroom. Ph.D. dissertation. UPV/EHU, University of Basque Country: https://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/25839
  • Arocena, M. E. Cenoz, J. & Gorter, D. (2015). Teachers’ beliefs in multilingual education in the Basque country and in Friesland (OA). Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3. 169-193. Doi: 10.1075/jicb.3.2.01aro.
  • Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40, 282-295. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2012.05.001
  • Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bikandi, U. & Valls, A. (ed.) (2008). El tratamiento integrado de las lenguas. Textos, 47.
  • Elorza, I. & Muñoa, I. (2008). Promoting the MInority Language Through Integrated Plurilingual Language Planning: The Case of the Ikastolas. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 21, 1, 85-101
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (2014). Heziberri 2020 Marco del Modelo educativo pedagógico. Online: http://www.hezkuntza.ejgv.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/heziberri_2020/es_hezi berr/adjuntos/Heziberri_2020_c.pdf
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (2016). Decreto 236/2015, de 22 de diciembre, por el que se establece el currículo de la Educación Básica y se implanta en la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (BOPV, 15-01-2016). Online: https://www.euskadi.eus/y22- bopv/eu/bopv2/datos/2016/01/1600142e.shtml
  • Gil, E. J. C. (2019). Percepción de los futuros docentes sobre la utilización del inglés como lengua vehicular en educación física en educación secundaria: Un análisis DAFO. In Juan de Dios Martínez Agudo, María Guadalupe de la Maya Retamar and Rafael Alejo González (eds.) Bilingual education under debate. Practice, research and teacher education, 207-2019.
  • Griva, E. & Chostelidou, D. (2011). English language Teachers’ conceptions and attitudes to multilingual development in Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, p. 1780-1785
  • Guash, O. (2008). Reflexión interlingüística y enseñanza integrada de lenguas. Textos, 47, p. 20-32
  • Haukås, A. (2016) Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13:1, p. 1-18, DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2015.1041960
  • Lucero, M., Valcke, M., & Schellens, T. (2013). Teachers‟ beliefs and self- reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 35(8), 1407- 1423. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.704430
  • Martínez, L. V., Perez, M. E. D. M., & Piñeiro, M. R. N. (2019). Percepción docente sobre la Realidad Aumentada en la Enseñanza de Ciencias en Primaria. Análisis DAFO. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 3301-3301.
  • Murciano, A., Ozaeta, A. & Sanz, M. (2016). Saberes y dificultades de seis maestros de educación primaria sobre la enseñanza del debate socio-científico en contextos multilingües con las lenguas minoritarias. In Díez Mediavilla, A.; Brotons Rico, V.; Escandell Maestre, D.; Rovira Collado, J. (ed.). Aprendizajes plurilingües y literarios. Nuevos enfoques didácticos = Aprenentatges plurilingües i literaris. Nous enfocaments didàctics. Alacant: Publicacions de la Universitat d’Alacant, pp. 178-186
  • Neuner, G. (2009) Zu den Grundlagen und Prinzipien der Mehrsprachigkeitsdidaktik und des Tertiärsprachenlernens. Babylonia, 4, 14–17.
  • Romero Gutiérrez, M., Martínez Chico, M., & Jiménez Liso, M. R. (2015). Evaluación del máster interuniversitario de educación ambiental a través de las percepciones de estudiantes y profesores en un análisis DAFO. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 12(2), pp-347.
  • Ruiz Pérez, T. (2008). El tratamiento integrado de las lenguas. Construir una programación conjunta. Textos, 46, p. 46-58
  • Schwab-Berger, S.R. (2015). Teacher’s Perceptions of the Implementation of a Multilingual Approach to Language Teaching. PhD Dissertation. Walden University.
  • Tukundane, C., Minnaert, A., Zeelen, J., & Kanyandago, P. (2015). Building vocational skills for marginalised youth in Uganda: A SWOT analysis of four training programmes. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 134-144.
  • Young, T. J., & Walsh, S. (2010). Which English? Whose English? An investigation of non-native teachers’ beliefs about target varieties. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 23(2), 123-137. doi: 10.1080/07908311003797627
Data source: Dialnet