Análisis y creación de Máquinas Virtuales Cognitivaspercepción de aprendizaje útil del alumnado universitario

  1. Tejada Garitano, Eneko 1
  2. Romero Andonegui , Ainara 2
  3. López de la Serna , Aranzazu 2
  4. Bilbao Quintana, Naiara 2
  1. 1 Profesor adjunto UPV/EHU
  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 2529-9638

Año de publicación: 2019

Título del ejemplar: Pensamiento computacional, robótica y programación en educación

Número: 7

Páginas: 61-72

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/RIITE.397911 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Cognitive virtual machines from the perspective of human computational thinking, help students to learn how to solve complex problems more easily and automatically without using technolog. This paper presents a research that aims to know the students' perception of the usefulness, ease and enjoyment of the use of cognitive virtual machines. The study was carried out within the framework of a UPV/EHU Teaching Innovation project with students from the last course of the Primary Education Degree (Faculty of Education in Bilbao), which aimed to analyze and create cognitive virtual machines to solve problems of an academic nature of university students. For this, it was carried out in a descriptive quantitative study. The study concludes that students value positively the use of cognitive virtual machines to perform useful learning.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Arranz, H., y Pérez, A. (2017). Evaluación del pensamiento computacional en educación. RIITE. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 3, pp. 25-39. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/riite/2017/267411
  • Basogain, X., Olabe, M.A., Olabe, J.C., y Rico (2018). Computational Thinking in Pre-University Blended Learning. Classrooms Journal Computers in Human Behavior, 80, pp. 412-419.
  • Basogain, X., Olabe, M.A., y Olabe, J.C. (2015). Pensamiento computacional a través de la Programación: Paradigma de Aprendizaje. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 46, pp. 1-36.
  • Brunner, M., Artelt, C., Krauss, S., y Baumert, J. (2007). Coaching for the PISA test. Learning and Instruction, 17(2), pp. 111-122.
  • Carretero, M (1982). El desarrollo de los procesos cognitivos: investigaciones transculturales. Estudios de Psicología. Madrid: Infancia y Aprendizaje.
  • CSTA.ISTE. (2011). Computational Thinking in K–12. Education leadership toolkit, 43.
  • Hubwieser. P., Armoni, M., Giannakos, M. N., y Mittermeir, R. T. (2014). Perspectives and visions of computer science education in primary and secondary (k-12) schools. Transactions on Computing Education, 14(2).
  • Mazzeo, J., y von Davier, M. (2008). Review of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) test design: Recommendations for fostering stability in assessment results. Education Working Papers EDU/PISA/GB, 28, pp. 23-24.
  • Monseur, C., Baye, A., Lafontaine, D., y Quittre, V. (2011). PISA test format assessment and the local independence assumption. IERI Monograph series–Issues and Methodologies in Large Scale Assessments, 4, pp. 131-158.
  • Olabe, J.C., Basogain, X., y Olabe, M.A. (2018). Using the Computational Model of the Mind to Design Educational Methodologies. Solving Problems More Efficiently in the Classroom. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4(4), pp. 264-270.doi: 10.18178/ijlt.4.4.264-270
  • Olabe, J.C., Basogain, X., y Olabe, M.A. (2016). Solving Complex Problems with a Computational Mind: An Alternative to Heuristic Search. International Journal of Learning and Teaching 2(1), pp, 12-19. doi: 10.18178/ijlt.2.1.12-19
  • Olabe, J.C., Basogain, X., Olabe, M.A, Maíz, I., y Castaño, C. (2014). Solving Math and Science Problems in the Real World with a Computational Mind. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 3(2), pp. 75-82. doi: 10.7821/naer.3.2.75-82
  • Román, M. (2015). Computational Thinking Test: Design Guidelines and Content Validation. 7th anual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Barcelona: IATED,
  • Schneider, M. (2009). The international PISA test. Education Next, 9(4), pp. 69-74.
  • Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 49(3), pp. 33-35.
  • Wing, J. M. (2011). Computational thinking: What and why. Recuperado de: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
  • Wojciechowski, R., y Cellary, C. (2013). Evaluation of learners´ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, pp. 570-585. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
  • Wolfram, S. (2016). How to teach computational thinking. Stephen Wolfram Blog. Recuperado de: http://blog.stephenwolfram.com/2016/09/how-to-teach-computational-thinking/
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet