Cronografías procreativasejemplos etnográficos analizados desde una nueva perspectiva

Bibliographic References

• Annis, L.F. (1978). The Child before Birth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Blázquez, M.I. (2005). Aproximación a la antropología de la reproducción. AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 42: 1-22
• Browner, C. y Press, N. (1995). The normalization of prenatal diagnostic testing. En Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. F. Ginsburg y R. Rapp, Ed. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Casado, I. (2010). Salud sexual y reproductiva y representaciones en torno a la formación de los seres humanos entre los imazighen del Rif inmigrados en Catalunya. En Cultura, cuerpo, género: Salud. P. Heras, Coord. Elche: Universidad Miguel Hernández.
• Cosminsky, S. (1977). Childbirth and midwifery on a Guatemalan finca. Medical Anthropology, 3(1): 69-104.
• Davis-Floyd, R. y Sargent, C. (Eds.) (1997). Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Davis-Floyd, R. y Dumit, J. (Ed.) (1998). Cyborg Babies: From Techno Sex to Techno Tots. New York: Routledge.
• Davis-Floyd, R. y Franklin, S. (2005). On reproduction. En Encyclopedia of Anthropology. H.J. Birx, Ed. London: Sage Publications.
• De Miguel, J.M. (1996). Auto/biografías. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
• Del Valle, T. (Coord.) (2002). Modelos emergentes en los sistemas y relaciones de género. Madrid: Narcea Ediciones.
• Edwards, J.; Franklin, S.; Hirsch, E.; Price, F. y Strathern, M. (1993). Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Eakins, P. (1986). The American Way of Birth. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
• Fons, V. (2008). Algunas consideraciones teóricas a propósito de la concepción de la salud procreativa de las mujeres ndowe de Guinea Ecuatorial. En Diversidad frente al espejo. Salud, Interculturalidad y Contexto Migratorio. Quito: Abya-Yala.
• Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
• Franklin, S. y Ragone, H. (Eds.) (1997). Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Ginsburg, F. y Rapp, R. (Ed.) (1995). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Ginsburg, F. y Rapp, R. (1991). The Politics of Reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 311-343.
• Haraway, D.J. (1992). The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. En Cultural Studies. L. Grossberg, C. Nelson y P.A. Treichler, Eds. New York: Routledge.
• Helmreich, S.G. (1995). Anthropology Inside and Outside: The Looking-Glass Worlds of Artificial Life. Tesis doctoral. Department of Anthropology, Stanford University.
• Imaz, E. (2017). La maternité partagée chez les couples de lesbiennes. Ethnologie Française, 3.
• Jeffery, P.; Jeffery, R. y Lyon, A. (1989). Labour Pains and Labour Power: Women and Childbearing in India. London: London Zed Books.
• Jordan, B. (1977). Birth in four cultures: a cross-cultural investigation of childbirth in the Yucatan, Holland, Sweden and the United States. Waveland Press.
• Kay, M. (1982). Anthropology of Human Birth. Philadelphia: Davis Co
• Kitzinger, S. (1978). Women as Mothers: How They See Themselves in Different Cultures. New York: Vintage Books.
• Laderman, C. (1983). Wives and Midwives: Childbirth and Nutrition in Rural Malaysia. Berkeley: University of California.
• Lázare, S. (2016). Análisis antropológico del cuerpo en los relatos de parto normal de mujer y profesionales de Barcelona. MUSAS, Revista de Investigación en Mujer, Salud y Sociedad, 1(1): 3-15.
• Lázare, S. y Fons, V. (2016). Los procesos procreativos desde la Antropología: el caso de las madres de Barcelona por un parto respetado. Revista Quaderns-e, 21(2): 21-37.
• Lindendaum, S. y Lock, M. (Ed.) (1993). Knowledge, Power, and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine in Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• López, I. (1998). An Ethnography of the Medicalization of Puerto Rican Women’s Reproduction. En Pragmatic Women and Body Politics. M. Lock y P. Kaufert, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• MacCormack, C. (1982). Ethnography of Fertility and Birth. London: Academic Press.
• McClain, C. (1975). Ethno-obstetrics in Ajijic. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 48(1): 38-56.
• McPherson, N. y Walks, M. (Eds.) (2011). Anthropology of Mothering. Bradford: Demeter Press.
• Martin, E. (1987). The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Mead, M. y Newton, N. (1965). Conception, Pregnancy, Labor and the Puerperium in Cultural Perspective. En First International Congress of Psychosomatic Medicine and Childbirth. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
• Narotzky, S. (1995). Mujer, mujeres y género. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
• Newman, L. (1985). Women’s Medicine. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Oakley, A. (1980). Women confined. Towards a Sociology of Childbirth. Oxford: Robertson.
• Oakley, A. (1987). From Walking Wombs to Test-tube Babies. En Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. M. Stanworth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Petchesky, R.P. (1987). Fetal Images: The Power of the Visual Culture in the Politics of Reproduction. Feminist Studies, 13(2): 263-292.
• Press, N. (1996). Provisional Normality and Perfect Babies: Pregnant Women’s Attitudes Towards Disability in the Context of the Prenatal Testing. En Reproducing Reproduction.S. Franklin y H. Ragone, Eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Rabinow, P. (1996). Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Raphael, D. (1985). Only Mothers Know: Patterns of Infant Feeding in Traditional Cultures. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
• Rapp, R. (2000). Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.Rapp, R. (1994). Commentary. Newsletter of the Council on Anthropology and Reproduction, 2(1): 1-3.
• Rothman, B. (1986). The Tentative Pregnancy. New York: Viking/Penguin.
• Rothman, B. (1982). In labor, Women and Power in the Birthplace. London: Junction Books.
• Sáez, M. y Catalán, O. (2012). Estás de siete meses y... ¿vienes ahora? L’atenció a la salut sexual i reproductiva de la població gitana romanesa. Revista Perifèria, 17(1): 1-29.
• Sapir, E. (1934). Symbolism. Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences,14: 492-495.
• Sargent, C. (1996). Ways of Knowing About Birth in Three Cultures. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 10(2): 213-236.
• Sargent, C. (1982). The Cultural Context of Therapeutic Choice: Obstetrical Decisions among the Bariba of Benin. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
• Schütz, A. (1993) [1932]. La construcción significativa del mundo social. Introducción a la sociología comprensiva. Barcelona: Paidós.
• Stoller Shaw, N. (1974). Forced Labor: Maternity Care in the United States. Oxford: Pergamon Studies in Critical Sociology.
• Stolcke, V. (1988). New Reproductive Technologies – Old Fatherhood. Reproductive and Genetic Engineering, 1(1): 5-19.
• Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the Future: Anthropology, Kinship, and the New Reproductive Technology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Tabet, P. (1998). La construction sociale de l’inégalité des sexes. Des outils et des corps. Paris: L’Harmattan.
• Taylor, J.S. (1996). Image of Contradiction: Image Ultrasound in American Culture. En Reproducing Reproduction. S. Franklin y H. Ragone, Eds. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Turner, V. (1967). The Forest of Symbols. New York: Ithaca.
• Uribe, J.M. (2016). Biopolítica del niño sano: procreación biológica, social y jurídica. Revista Quaderns-e, 21(2): 103-118.