Research on MOOCstrends and methodologies

  1. Inmaculada Maiz Olazabalaga 1
  2. Carlos Castaño Garrido 1
  3. Urtza Garay Ruiz 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

ISSN: 1697-7467

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Innovating in the didactic second language scenario: new mobile, open and social models

Número: 1

Páginas: 87-98

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.30827/DIGIBUG.54092 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras

Resumen

El interés despertado por el fenómeno MOOC en la educación ha generado casi desde sus comienzos un buen número de estudios de investigación. En este trabajo, repasamos la investigación precedente en MOOC y consideramos que las tendencias de investigación relevantes desde la educación se centrarán en los nuevos desarrollos de MOOC híbridos, tanto en sus aspectos tecnológicos como pedagógicos, y en situar el aprendizaje y el resultado académico de los estudiantes como punto central de la investigación. Se recomienda igualmente la utilización de diseños de investigación más sofisticados que presenten atención a factores causales que promuevan el aprendizaje de los estudiantes

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Andersen, R. and Ponti, M. (2014). “Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities”. Distance Education, 35, 2, 234-249, available from: http:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587919.2014.917703, accessed 9 September, 2015.
  • Brooks, D. W. (2012). “The campus tsunami”, in New York Times (4-5-2012), 3, A29. Bruff, D.O., Fisher, D.H., McEwen, K.E. & Smith, B.E. (2013). “Wrapping in a MOOC: student perceptions in blended learning”. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 2: 187-199, available from: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/bruff_0613.htm, accessed 8 September, 2015.
  • Cabero, J. (2015). “Educational visions of MOOC”. RIED, 18, 2: 39-60, available from: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/13718, accessed 9 September, 2015.
  • Castaño, C. (2013). “Tendencias en la investigación en MOOC. Primeros resultados”. In IKASNABAR, 2013, VI Congreso Internacional de Educación Abierta y Tecnología, available from: http:// ikasnabar.com/papers/castano1/, accessed 15 July, 2015.
  • Castaño, C., Maiz, I. and Garay, U. (2015a). “Design, Motivation and Performance in a Cooperative MOOC Course”. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Educación y Comunicación, 44: 19-26, available from: http://www.revistacomunicar.com/verpdf.php?numero=44&articulo=44-201502&idioma=en, accessed 15 September, 2015.
  • Castaño, C., Maiz, I. and Garay, U. (2015b). “Students perceptions of a university MOOC”. RIED, 18, 2: 197-224, available from: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/13444/13058, accessed 2 September, 2015.
  • Cheng, J.C.Y. (2014). “An Exploratory Study of Emotional Affordance of a Massive Open Online Course”. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17, 1: 43-55, available from: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2014&halfyear=1&article=607, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Chiappe-Laverde, A., Hine, N. y Martínez Silva, J.A. (2015). “Literature and Practice: A Critical Review of MOOCs”. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 44: 9-18, available from: http://www.revistacomunicar.com/index.php?contenido=detalles&nu mero=44&articulo=44-2015-01, accessed 2 September, 2015.
  • Conole, G. (2013). “Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC”. Campus Virtuales, 2, 16-28, available from: http://www.uajournals.com/campusvirtuales/es/revistaes/numeroactual.html?id=77, accessed 3 September, 2015.
  • De Waard, I., Abajian, S., Sean Gallagher, M., Hogue, R., Keskin, N., Koutropoulos, A. & Rodriguez, O. (2011). “Using mLearning and MOOCs to Understand Chaos, Emergence, and Complexity in Education”. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 7, 95-115, available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/ view/1046, accessed 13 September, 2015.
  • Delgado Kloos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estevez Ayres, I. and Fernández Panadero, C. (2015). Mixing and blending MOOC Technologies with face-to-face pedagogies. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2015 IEEE, available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=7096090&tag=1, accessed 2 July, 2015.
  • Dillenbourg, P., Fox, A., Kirchner, C., Mitchell, J. y Wirsing, M. (2014). “Massive Open Online Courses: Current state and Perspectives”. Dagstuhl Manifestos, 4, 1, 1-27, available from: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2014/4786/pdf/dagman-v004-i001-p001-14112.pdf, accessed 3 July, 2015.
  • Ferguson, R. (2012). “Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges”. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 5/6, 304–317, available from: http://www. inderscience.com/offer.php?id=51816, accessed 16 September, 2015
  • Fidalgo, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L. and García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2015). “Methodological approach and technological framework to break the current limitations of MOOC model”. Journal of Computer Science, 21, 5: 712-743, available from: http://www.jucs.org/jucs_21_5/ methodological_approach_and_technological, accessed 15 July, 2015.
  • Fidalgo, A., Sein-Echaluce, MªL., Borrás, O. & García Peñalvo, F.J. (2014). Educación en abierto: integración de un MOOC con una asignatura académica. TESI. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 15, 3: 233-255, available from: http://campus.usal.es/~revistas_trabajo/index.php/revistatesi/article/view/12226/12571, accessed 1 September 2015.
  • Fidalgo, A., Sein-Echaluce, M.L. and García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2013). “MOOC cooperativo. Una integración entre cMOOC y xMOOC”, in Fidalgo, A. y Sein-Echaluce M.L. (Eds.). Actas del II Congreso Internacional sobre Aprendizaje, Innovación y Competitividad, CINAIC. Madrid: Fundación General de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 481-486, available from: http://gredos.usal.es/jspui/bitstream/10366/122486/1/DIA_PaperMOOCs.pdf, accessed 15 September, 2015.
  • Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J. & Willett, T. (2014). “Case study: using MOOCs for conventional college coursework”. Distance Education, 35 (2): 178-201, available from: http:// www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587919.2014.917707, accessed 10 September, 2015.
  • Gallego, M.J., Gámiz, S. and Gutiérrez, E. (2015). “Tendencias en la evaluación del aprendizaje en cursos en línea masivos y abiertos”. Educación XXI, 18, 2: 77-96, available from: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/educacionXX1/article/viewFile/14596/12996, accessed 15 July, 2015.
  • García Aretio, L. (2015). “MOOC: ¿tsunami, revolución o moda pasajera?”. RIED, 18, 1: 9-21, available from: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/ried/article/view/13812/12492, accessed 11 September, 2015
  • Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S. and Siemens, G. (2014). “Where is research on massive open online courses headed?. A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initative”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 5: 134-175, available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1954/3099, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Gorard, S. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press-McGraw Hill Education.
  • Gorard, S. and Cook, T. (2007). “Where does good evidence come from?”. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30, 3: 307-323, available from: http://www.tandfonline. com/doi/abs/10.1080/17437270701614790?journalCode=cwse20, accessed 11 September 2015.
  • Guo, P.J. and Reinecke, K. (2014). Demographic Differences in How Students Navigate Through MOOCs. Philip J. Guo and Katharina Reinecke. ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, March 2014, available from: http://www.pgbovine.net/publications/edX-MOOC-demographicsand-navigation_LAS-2014.pdf, accessed 12 September, 2015.
  • Guo, P.J., Kim, J. and Rubin, R. (2014). How Video Production Affects Student Engagement: An Empirical Study of MOOC Videos. ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, March 2014. Atlanta, Georgia, available from: http://www.pgbovine.net/publications/edX-MOOCvideo-production-and-engagement_LAS-2014.pdf, accessed 4 September, 2015.
  • Hollands, F.M. and Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: expectations and reality. Full Report. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, available from: https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf, accessed 15 September, 2015.
  • Israel, M.J. (2015). “Effectiveness of Integrating MOOCs in Traditional Classrooms for Undergraduate Students”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16, 5: 102-118, available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2222/3437, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Jordan, K. (2014). MOOC Research Literature Browser. Katy Jordan Researching Education and Technology, available from: http://www.katyjordan.com/moocliterature/, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Kennedy, J. (2014). “Characterics of Massive Opne Online Course (MOOCs): A research review, 2009-2012”. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13, 1, available from: http://www. ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/13.1.1.pdf, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Knox, J., Bayne, S., MacLeod, H., Ross, J. and Sinclair, C. (2012). MOOC Pedagogy: the challenges of developing for Coursera. Blog Association for Learning Technology, available from: https://altc.alt.ac.uk/blog/2012/08/mooc-pedagogy-the-challenges-of-developing-forcoursera/, accessed 15 September, 2015.
  • Kop, R., Fournier, H. & Mak, S.F.J. (2011). A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Special Issue Emergent Learning, Connections, Design for Learning, 12, 7, 74-93, available from: http://www.irrodl.org/ index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2042, accessed 25 September, 2015.
  • Lane, L. (2012). Three Kinds of MOOC. Available from: http://lisahistory.net/wordpress/2012/08/ three-kinds-of-moocs/, accessed 10 September, 2015.
  • Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A. and Williams, S.A. (2013). “MOOC: A Systematic Study of the Published Literature 2008-12”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 14, 3: 202-227, available from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/ article/view/1455/2531, accessed 12 July, 2015.
  • López-Meneses, E., Vázquez-Cano, E. and Román, P. (2015). “Analysis and Implications of the Impact of MOOC Movement in the Scientific Community: JCR and Scopus (2010-13). Comunicar. Revista Científica de Educación y Comunicación, 44: 73-80, available from: http://www.revistacomunicar.com/verpdf.php?numero=44&articulo=44-2015-08&idioma=en, accessed 12 July, 2015.
  • Lowenthal, P.R. and Hodges, Ch.B. (2015). “In Search of Quality: Using Quality Matters to Analyze the Quality of Massive, Open, Online Courses (MOOCs)”. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 16, 5: 83-100, available from: http:// www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2348/3411, accessed 13 July, 2015.
  • Meyer, E. (2015). “Massive Open Oline Courses (MOOCS): a research brief march 2015”. ResearchGate available from: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4430.6406, accessed 12 September, 2015.
  • Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. & Margaryan, A. (2013). “Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs”. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 2: 149-159, available from: http:// jolt.merlot.org/vol9no2/milligan_0613.pdf, accessed 15 July, 2015.
  • Monedero, J. J., Cebrián, D. and Desenne, P. (2015). “Usability and Satisfaction in Multimedia Annotation Tools for MOOCs”. Comunicar. Revista Científica de Educación y Comunicación, 44: 55-62, available from: http://www.revistacomunicar.com/verpdf.php?numero=44&articulo=442015-06&idioma=en, accessed 8 September, 2015.
  • Raffaghelli, J., Cucchiara, S. and Persico, D. (2015). “Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracting the myth of Proteus”. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 3: 488-509, available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12279/full, accessed 22 July, 2015.
  • Reich, J. (2015). “Rebooting MOOC Research. Improve assessment, data sharing and experimental design”. Science Magazine, 347, 6217: 34-35, available from: https://www.sciencemag.org/ content/347/6217/34.short?related-urls=yes&legid=sci;347/6217/34, accessed 22 July, 2015.
  • Rodriguez, C.O. (2012). MOOC and de AI-Stanford like courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2012, II, available from: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/ Rodriguez.pdf, accessed 25 July, 2015.
  • Rodriguez, C.O. (2013). The Concept of Openness Behind c and x-MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5, 1, 67-73, available from: http://openpraxis.org/index.php/ OpenPraxis/article/view/42, accessed 14 September, 2015.
  • Sandeen, C. (2013). Assessment’s place in the new MOOC world. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8 (1): 5-12
  • Sangrá, A., González-Sanmamed, M. and Anderson, T. (2015). “Metaanálisis de la investigación sobre MOOC en el período 2013-2014”. Educación XXI, 18, 2: 21-59, available from: http:// revistas.uned.es/index.php/educacionXX1/article/view/14594, accessed 2 September, 2015.
  • Shirky, C. (2013). MOOC and Economic Reality, in The Chronicle of Higher Education (8,7,2013)
  • Siemens, G. (2012). MOOC are Really a Platform, available from: http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/, accessed 18 July 2015. Siemens, G. (2014). Multiple pathways: Blending xMOOCs and cMOOCs, available from: http:// www.elearnspace.org/blog/2014/05/06/multiple-pathways-blending-xmoocs-cmoocs/, accessed 3 September 2015.
  • Vargas, J. (2014). “What Can Online Course Designers Learn from Research on Machine-Delivered Instruction?” Academe, 100. 3: 8-12, available from: http://www.aaup.org/article/what-can-online-course-designers-learn-research-machine-deliveredinstruction#.VhKPi3tLcaB, accessed 5 September, 2015.
  • Veletsianos, G. (2013). Learner Experiences with MOOCs and Open Online Learning. Hybrid Pedagogy. Available from: http://hybrid-pedagogy.github.io/LearnerExperiencesInMOOCs/, accessed 10 July 2015.
  • Vihavainen, A., Luukkainen, M., & Kurhila, J. (2013). “MOOC as semester-long entrance exam”. En Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM SIGITE Conference on Information Technology Education (177-182). ACM, available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2512276.2512305, accessed 3 July, 2015.
  • Yousef, A.M.F., Chatti, M.A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M. and Jakobs, H. (2015). MOOCs. A review of the state-of-the-art. CSEDU2014 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, available from: https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud. org/files/MOOCs%20-%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20State-of-the-Art.pdf, accessed 2 September 2015.
  • Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). “MOOC and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education”. CETIS: Centre for Educational Technology, Interoperability and Standards, White Paper, WP03, available from: http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667, accessed 2 July, 2015.
  • Yuan, L., and Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. JISC Cetis White Paper, available from: http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667, accessed 4 September 2015.
  • Zhang, D.J. et al. (2015). “Does Social Interaction improve service Quality?. Field Evidence from Massive Open Online Education”. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, available from: http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/vanmieghem/ htm/pubs/mooc_zhang-allon-vanmieghem_9_21_2015.pdf, accessed 23 September 2015.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet