A metatheatrical commentary on the Medea of Seneca

  1. Jonathan Lavilla de Lera
Revista:
Análisis: revista colombiana de humanidades

ISSN: 0120-8454

Año de publicación: 2016

Número: 88

Páginas: 147-162

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15332/S0120-8454.2016.0088.08 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Análisis: revista colombiana de humanidades

Resumen

The article focuses on some of the rhetorical aspects of tragedy in order to provide a metatheatrical reading of Seneca’s Medea. To do so, it analyzes the character of Medea as playing the role of the poet’s alter ego. This analysis makes the division of the plot in two levels possible: on the one hand, there is the play of the poet, i.e. the Medea of Seneca; on the other, there is the play of Medea within the play of Seneca, i.e. the play within the play. This approach should offer the reader some meaningful reflections on the rhetorical nature of the play.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Almirall Sardà, J. (2014), “Ἑλένη δραματουργός. Ficció dins la ficció en l’Hèlena d’Eurípides”. Ítaca: quaderns catalans de filologia clàssica, no. 30, pp. 59-75.
  • Boyle, A. J. (1997), Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London and New York: Routledge.
  • ___ (ed.) (2014), Seneca, Medea, edited with introduction, translation and commentary by A. J. Boyle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cassin, B. (1995), L’effet sophistique. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Conacher, D. J. (1998), Euripides and the Sophists: some dramatic treatments of philosophical ideas. London: Duckworth.
  • Costa, C. D. N. (ed.) (1973), Seneca, Medea, edited with introduction and commentary by C. D. N. Costa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Erasmo, M. (2004). Roman Tragedy:Theatre to Theatricality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Fitch, J. G. and McElduff, S. (2008), “Construction of the Self in Senecan Drama”, pp. 157-158. In Fitch, J. G. (ed.), Seneca: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kohn, Th. D. (2013), The Dramaturgy of Senecan Drama. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Kragelund, P. (2008), “Senecan Tragedy: Back on Stage?”, pp. 181-194. In Fitch, J. G. (ed.), Seneca: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hine, H. M. (ed.) (2000), Seneca, Medea, with an Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary by H. M Hine. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.
  • Lavilla de Lera, J. (2013), “El lógos en la Helena de Eurípides”, pp. 141-171. In B. Berruecos Frank and J. Lavilla de Lera (eds.), ΔΙΔΑΣΚΑΛΙΗ ΑΚΟΡΗΤΟΣ. Homenaje a Antonio Alegre Gorri. Barcelona: Gráficas Trialba.
  • Liebermann, W. F. (2014), “Medea”, pp. 459-474. In Damschen, G. and Heil, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: Brill.
  • Luque Moreno, J. (ed.) (1979), Séneca, Tragedias I, introducción, traducción y notas de J. Luque Moreno. Madrid: Gredos.
  • Rostagni, A. (1962xxvii), Lineamenti di Storia della Letteratura Latina. Milan: Mondadori.
  • Schiesaro, A. (2003), The Passions in Play. Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.