La interfaz entre la biosfera y la noosferapensar las esferas de la sostenibilidad en la era del antropoceno

  1. Ayestarán, Ignacio 1
  1. 1 Departamento de Filosofía, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), España.
Revista:
Ludus vitalis: revista de filosofía de las ciencias de la vida = journal of philosophy of life sciences = revue de philosophie des sciences de la vie

ISSN: 1133-5165

Año de publicación: 2012

Volumen: 20

Número: 38

Páginas: 193-213

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Ludus vitalis: revista de filosofía de las ciencias de la vida = journal of philosophy of life sciences = revue de philosophie des sciences de la vie

Resumen

The interfase between the biosphere and the noosphere: thinking the global spheres for sustainability in the Anthropocen era.The fate of humanity in the biosphere dominates the background of our knowledge and existence in the twenty-first century. Homo sapiens, as a conscious, self-reflexive and technical being, has produced a new kind of reality on our planet: the noosphere. The noosphere was described collectively by Vladimir I. Vernadsky, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Edouard Le Roy in the 1920s as a scientific approach connected to philosophy and anthropology. The noosphere is a product of the biosphere as transformed by human knowledge and action. The interface between the biosphere and the noosphere is the main effort to tackle the global spheres for sustainability, as proposed by Martin O'Connor. By approaching this interface we may understand that we live in the Anthropocene, a new geological epoch or era in earth history. Although global-scale human influence on the environment has been recognized since the 1800s, the term Anthropocene has recently become widely used in the global change research community, especially in the interdisciplinary Earth System Science. This research community is an expression of the noosphere seeking global sustainability.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ayestarán, Ignacio (2008a), “The second Copernican revolution in the Anthropocene: an overview”, Revista Internacional de Sostenibilidad, Tecnología y Humanismo 3: 145-157.
  • Ayestarán, Ignacio (2008b), “Complejidad y arquitectura de redes sostenibles entre la biosfera y la tecnosfera: de Internet a Gaia”, Ontology Studies 8: 357-372.
  • Bascompte, Jordi y Luque, Bartolo (2012), Evolución y complejidad. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
  • Changeux, Jean Pierre, y Ricoeur, Paul (2000), Ce qui nous fait penser. La nature et la règle. París: Odile Jacob.
  • Clark, William C.; Crutzen, Paul J.; y Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim (2004), “Science for global sustainability. Toward a new paradigm,” in Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Paul J. Crutzen, William C. Clark, Martin Claussen y Hermann Held (eds.), Earth System Analysis for Sustainability: Report on the 91st Dahlem Workshop, Cambridge, Mass., y Londres, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press & Dahlem University Press, pp. 1-25.
  • Crutzen, Paul J. (2002), “Geology of mankind”, Nature 415: 23.
  • Le Roy, Édouard (1927), L'Exigence idéaliste et le fait de l'évolution. París: Boivin.
  • Le Roy, Édouard (1929), Les origines humaines et l'évolution de l'intelligence. París: Boivin.
  • Long, Norman (2001), Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. Londres: Routledge.
  • Lucht, Wolfgang y Pachauri, Rajendra K. (2004), “The mental component of the Earth System”, in Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Paul J. Crutzen, William C. Clark, Martin Claussen y Hermann Held (eds.), Earth System Analysis for Sustainability: Report on the 91st Dahlem Workshop, Cambridge, Mass., y Londres, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press & Dahlem University Press, pp. 341-365.
  • O'Connor, Martin (2006), “The `Four Spheres' framework for sustainability”, Ecological Complexity 3: 285-292.
  • Margulis, Lynn y Sagan, Dorion (1995), ¿Qué es la vida? Barcelona: Tusquets.
  • Maxim, Laura; Spangenberg, Joachim H.; y O'Connor, Martin (2009), “An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework”, Ecological Economics 69 (1): 12-23.
  • Sagan, Dorion (1990), Biosferas. Metamorfosis del planeta Tierra. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Sagols, Lizbeth (2006), Interfaz bioética. México: UNAM y Fontamara.
  • Samson, Paul R. y Pitt, David (eds.) (1999), The Biosphere and Noosphere Reader. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
  • Schellnhuber Hans Joachim; Crutzen, Paul J.; Clark, William C. y Hunt, Julian (2005), “Earth system analysis for sustainability”, Environment 47 (8): 10-25.
  • Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, y Sahagian, Dork (2002), “The twenty-three G questions”, Global Change Newsletter 49: 20-21.
  • Steffen Will; Grinevald, Jacques; Crutzen, Paul J.; y McNeill, John (2011), “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 842-867.
  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (1955), Le phénomène humain. París: Editions du Seuil.
  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (1959), El porvenir del hombre. Madrid: Taurus.
  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (1963), El fenómeno humano. Madrid: Taurus (trad. española de Teilhard de Chardin, 1955).
  • Vernadsky, Vladimir I. (1945), “The biosphere and the noosphere”, American Scientist 33 (1): 1-12 (trad. española en Vernadsky 1997, pp. 203-218).
  • Vernadsky, Vladimir I. (1997a), La biosfera. Madrid: Argentaria y Visor.
  • Vernadsky, Vladimir I. (1997b), “La biosfera y la noosfera”, en Vladimir I. Vernadsky 1997a, pp. 203-218.
  • Wikipedia (2012), “Interface”, http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interface (consultado en línea el 1 de mayo de 2012).
  • Zalasiewicz, Jan; Williams, Mark; Steffen, Will; y Crutzen, Paul J. (2010), “The new world of the Anthropocene”, Environmental Science & Technology 44 (7): 2228-2231
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet