Contrast effect on the perception of the severity of a criminal offence

  1. Gabriel Rodríguez 1
  2. Sara Blanco 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Revista:
Anuario de psicología jurídica

ISSN: 1133-0740

Año de publicación: 2016

Título del ejemplar: Evaluación de la conducta violenta

Número: 26

Páginas: 107-113

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.APJ.2016.02.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Anuario de psicología jurídica

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bennett T.L., Mackintosh N.J. Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52B:253-272.
  • Enescu R., Kuhn A. Serial Effects of Evidence on Legal Decision-Making. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2012, 4:99-118.
  • Englich B., Mussweiler T., Strack F. The last word in court-A hidden disadvantage for the defense. Law and Human Behavior 2005, 29:705-722.
  • Fariña F., Arce R., Novo M. Heurístico de anclaje en las decisiones judiciales. Psicothema 2002, 14:39-46.
  • Guthrie C., Rachlinski J.J., Wistrich A.J. Inside the judicial mind. Cornell Law Review 2000, 86:777-830.
  • Henle M. On naive realism. Perception: Essays in honor of James J. Gibson 1974, 40-56. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. R. MacLeod, H. Pick (Eds.).
  • Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow 2011, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY.
  • Kahneman D., Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 2002, 49-81. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
  • Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 1982, Cambridge University Press, New York. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Eds.).
  • Keren G., Teigen K.H. Yet another look at the heuristics and biases approach. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2004, 89-109. Blackwell, Oxford. D.J. Khoeler, N. Harvey (Eds.).
  • Meiselman H.L., Halpern B.P. Enhancement of taste intensity through pulsatile stimulation. Physiology and Behavior 1973, 11:713-716.
  • Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory 2004, Psychology Press, New York, NY. R. Pohl (Ed.).
  • Rafaeli A., Sutton R.I. Emotional contrast strategies as means of social influence: Lessons from criminal interrogators and bill collectors. Academy of Management Journal 1991, 34:749-775.
  • Rodríguez G., Angulo R. Simultaneous stimulus preexposure enhances human tactile perceptual learning. Psicológica 2014, 35:139-148.
  • Simon D. A third view of the black box: Cognitive coherence in legal decision making. The University of Chicago Law Review 2004, 511-586.
  • Trehub S.E. Infants' sensitivity to vowel and tonal contrasts. Developmental Psychology 1973, 9:91-96.
  • Weinstein I. Don't Believe Everything You Think: Cognitive Bias in Legal Decision Making. Clinical Law Review 2002, 9:783-834.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet