Males and females in EFL task-based interactiondoes gender have an impact on LREs?

  1. Agurtzane Azkarai 1
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

ISSN: 1697-0381

Argitalpen urtea: 2015

Zenbakia: 12

Orrialdeak: 9-35

Mota: Artikulua

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: VIAL, Vigo international journal of applied linguistics

Laburpena

Este estudio analiza el impacto del género en las oportunidades de aprendizaje de las que disponen aprendices españoles de inglés como lengua extranjera durante la interacción generada a raíz de la participación en tareas. Estos aprendices realizaron cuatro tareas colaborativas en parejas de género mixtas e iguales y dichas oportunidades de aprendizaje se operacionalizaron como episodios relacionados con el lenguaje (ERLs) en base a su producción, enfoque, resultados y nivel de compromiso. Los resultados mostraron un nivel de compromiso alto en los ERLs y ninguna diferencia entre hombres y mujeres en general. El resultado y nivel de compromiso en los ERLs sí se vieron afectados por el género del interlocutor de los participantes: tanto hombres como mujeres parecían tener más oportunidades de resolver ERLs en parejas mixtas y el nivel de compromiso de los hombres parecía algo más limitado que el de las mujeres.Este estudio respalda los beneficios del trabajo colaborativo en aprendices de una segunda lengua y proporciona nuevas pruebas sobre el impacto del género durante la interacción basada en tareas en contextos de inglés como lengua extranjera.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Adams, R., and L. Ross-Feldman. 2008. “Does writing influence learner attention to form?”. In D. Belcher and A. Hirvela (eds) 2008 The Oral-literate Connection. Perspectives on L2 Speaking, Writing, and other Media Interactions (pp. 243–265). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Alcón, E., and V. Codina. 1996. “The impact of gender on negotiation and vocabulary learning in a situation of interaction”. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 12: 21–35.
  • Azkarai, A., and M.P. García Mayo. 2012. “Does gender influence task performance in EFL? Interactive tasks and language related episodes”. In E. Alcón Soler and M.P. Safont Jordá (eds) 2012 Language Learners’ Discourse across L2 Instructional Settings (pp. 249-278). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • Bacon, S., and M. Finneman. 1992. “Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign-language learning and authentic oral and written input”. Language Learning 42: 471–495.
  • Basterrechea, M., and M. P. García Mayo. 2013. “Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners”. In K. McDonough and A. Mackey (eds) 2013 Interaction in Diverse Educational Settings (pp. 25–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Chant, S., and N. Craske. 2003. Gender in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.
  • Corson, D. 2001. Language, Diversity and Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ehrlich, S. 1997. “Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 421–446.
  • García Mayo, M. P. 2002a. “The effectiveness of two form-focused tasks in advanced EFL pedagogy”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12: 156–175.
  • __. 2002b. “Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of formfocused activities”. International Journal of Educational Research 37: 323–341.
  • __ (ed). 2007. Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • García Mayo, M. P., and M. L. García Lecumberri (eds). 2003. Age and the Acquisition of English as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Gass, S., and E. Varonis. 1985. “Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning”. In S.M. Gass, and C. Madden (eds) 1985 Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 149–161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • __. 1986. “Sex differences in non-native speaker/non-native speaker interactions”. In R.R. Day (ed) 1986 “Talking to Learn”: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327–351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
  • Góchez, R.E. 2006. http://www.gestiopolis.com/canales5/adepro/participacion-dela-mujer-en-el-salvador.htm Retrieved in June 2008
  • Goldstein, T. 1995. ““Nobody is talking bad”: Creating community and claiming power on the production lines”. In K. Hall, and M. Bucholtz (eds) 1995 Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 375–400). New York: Routledge.
  • __. 2001. “Researching women’s language practices in multilingual workplaces”. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, and M. Teutsch-Dwyer (eds) 2001 Multilingualism, Second Language, and Gender (pp. 77–101). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Heller, M. 2001. “Gender and public space in a bilingual school”. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller, and M. Teutsch-Dwyer (eds) 2001 Multilingualism, Second Language, and Gender (pp. 257–282). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Keck, C. M., G. Iberri-Shea, N. Tracy-Ventura, and S. Wa-Mbaleka. 2006. “Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis”. In J.M. Norris, and L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kouritzin, S. 2000. “Immigrant mothers redefine access to ESL classes: Contradiction and ambivalence”. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21:14–32.
  • Lantolf, J. P. (ed). 2000. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
  • Leeser, M. J. 2004. “Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue”. Language Teaching Research 8: 55–81.
  • Long, M.H. 1996. “The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition”. In W.C. Ritchie, and T.K. Bhatia (eds) 1996 Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.
  • Losey, K. 1995. “Gender and ethnicity as factors in the development of verbal skills in bilingual Mexican-American women”. TESOL Quarterly 4: 635–661.
  • Mackey, A., and J. Goo. 2007. “Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis”. In A. Mackey (ed) 2007 Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 407–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Madu, B.N., and L. A. Kasanga. 2005. “Sex differences in the acquisition of English as a second language”. Gender and Behavior 3: 442–452.
  • Malmqvist, A. 2005. “How does group discussion in reconstruction task affect written language output?” Language Awareness 14: 128–141.
  • Maltz, D. N., and R. A. Borker. 1982. “A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication”. In J. Gumperz (ed) 1982 Language and Identity (pp. 195–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Muñoz, C. (ed). 2006. Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Niu, R. 2009. “Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form”. Language Awareness 18: 384–402.
  • Norton, B. 2000. Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
  • Norton, B., and A. Pavlenko. 2004. “Gender and English Language Learners: Challenges and Possibilities”. In B. Norton, and A. Pavlenko (eds) 2004 Gender and English Language Learners (pp. 1–12). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
  • Ochs, E. 1993. “Indexing gender”. In B. D. Miller (ed) 1993 Sex and Gender Hierarchies (pp. 146–169). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oliver, R. 2002. “The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions”. The Modern Language Journal 86: 97–111.
  • Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. E. Lewis, and L. Morgenthaler. 1989. “Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistics demands on the learner”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 63–90.
  • Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. E. Lewis, D. Berducci, and J. Newman. 1991. “Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 343– 376.
  • Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and J. Falodun. 1993. “Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research”. In G. Crookes, and S.M. Gass (eds) 1993 Tasks and Language Learning (pp. 9–34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ross-Feldman, L. 2005. Task-based Interactions between Second Language Learners: Exploring the Role of Gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University.
  • __. 2007. “Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities?” In A. Mackey (ed) 2007 Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp. 52–77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Schmidt, R., and S. Frota. 1986. “Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese”. In R.R. Day (ed) 1986 Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
  • Shehadeh, A. 1994. “Gender differences and second language acquisition”. Research Journal of Aleppo University (Arts and Humanities Series) 26: 73–98.
  • Shehadeh, A. 1999. “Gender differences and equal opportunities in the ESL classroom”. ELT Journal 53: 256–261.
  • Storch, N. 2002. “Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work”. Language Learning 52: 119–158.
  • __. 2008. “Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development”. Language Awareness 17: 95–114.
  • Storch, N., and G. Wigglesworth. 2010. “Learners’ processing, uptake and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32: 303–334.
  • Sunderland, J. 1998. “Girls being quiet: a problem for foreign language classrooms?” Language Teaching Research 2: 48–82.
  • Swain, M. 1998. “Focus on form through conscious reflection”. In C. Doughty and J. Williams (eds) Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 64-81.
  • __. 2000. “The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue”. In J. Lantolf (ed) 2000 Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 97-114.
  • Swain, M., and S. Lapkin. 1998. “Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together”. Modern Language Journal 82: 320–337.
  • Syndicate, U.C.L.E. 2001. Quick Placement Test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Tannen, D. 1990. You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
  • __. 1994. Gender and Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Wajnryb, R. 1990. Grammar Dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wigglesworth, G., and N. Storch. 2012. “What role of collaboration in writing and writing feedback”. Journal of Second Language Writing 21: 364–374.
  • Williams, J. 1999. Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning 49: 583–625
Datuen iturria: Dialnet