Experiencias de investigación feministapropuestas y reflexiones metodológicas

  1. Luz María Martínez Martínez 1
  2. Barbara Biglia 2
  3. Marta Luxán 3
  4. Cristina Fernández Bessa 4
  5. Jokin Azpiazu Carballo 3
  6. Jordi Bonet Martí 5
  1. 1 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Psicologia Social
  2. 2 Universitat Rovira i Virgili
    info

    Universitat Rovira i Virgili

    Tarragona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/00g5sqv46

  3. 3 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  4. 4 Universitat de Barcelona
    info

    Universitat de Barcelona

    Barcelona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/021018s57

  5. 5 Universitat de Girona
    info

    Universitat de Girona

    Girona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01xdxns91

Show affiliations +
Journal:
Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

ISSN: 1578-8946

Year of publication: 2014

Volume: 14

Issue: 4

Pages: 3-16

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5565/REV/ATHENEA.1513 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Athenea Digital: revista de pensamiento e investigación social

Abstract

This text means to be an introduction to the monograph named “Feminist research experiences: reflections and proposals on methodologies”. We aim to express the main concerns and motivations that led us to elaborate it, as well as the process of working with feminist research methodologies in the frame of SIMReF. We try and express the difficulties we met when aiming to produce non-androcentric forms of knowledge in academia. At the same time we underline our interest on working with and forward methods to transverse gender analysis in different disciplines. We also draw on the opportunity to elaborate guides or methodological reference texts on the implementation of feminist epistemologies in our research and, specially, advocate the idea of giving account about practical decisions taken during the research processes, revealing the “back room”within them. Finally, we provide a short description of the articles included in the monograph.

Bibliographic References

  • Biglia, Barbara. & Jiménez, Edurne (2012) Conformidades y disconformidades en habitar los márgenes de la investigación social. En Yolanda Onghena y Alvise Vianello (Coords.) Políticas del conocimiento y Dinámicas interculturales (pp.103-116). Barcelona: CIDOB edicions.
  • Cabruja, Teresa (2003). Astucias de la razón y psicología crítica: condiciones de erotismo sedución, prácticas de tokenismo y resistencias éticos-políticas. Politíca y Sociedad, 40 (1), 141-153.
  • Caprile, Maria; Meulders, Danièle; O’Dorchai, Sîle; Vallès, Nuria (2011). Introduction to the Special Issue. Gender and Science: Old Challanges, New Approaches. Brusell Economic Review, 54, nº 2/3, 108-129.
  • European Gender Summit (2011). Manifesto for Integrated Action on the Gender Dimension in Research and Innovation. Recuperado el 27 de noviembre de 2014, de http://www.gender-summit.eu/index.php? option=com_content&view=article&id=278&Itemid=42
  • Fox Keller, Eveline. (1989): Reflexiones sobre genero y ciencia Valencia: Alfons de Magnanim.
  • GenSET. (2010) Recomandation for action on the Gender dimention in science. London: Portia.
  • Haraway, Donna J. (1995) Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres. La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
  • Harding, Sandra (1987) Introduction: Is there a feminist method? In Sandra Harding (Ed) Feminism and Methodology: Social science issues (pp.1-11). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • Harding, Sandra (1996) Ciencia y feminismo. Madrid: Morata. UN (2010) United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Gender, Science and Technology, Paris, 28 de setiembre a 1 Octubre de 2012. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/egm/gst_2010/index.html
Data source: Dialnet