Romantic attachment in chilean adultsdevelopment of a short-form version of the experiences in close relationships

  1. Spencer Contreras, Rosario 1
  2. Alonso Arbiol, Itziar 2
  3. Fresno Rodríguez, Andrés 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Talca
    info

    Universidad de Talca

    Talca, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/01s4gpq44

  2. 2 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

Aldizkaria:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Argitalpen urtea: 2013

Zenbakia: 16

Orrialdeak: 1-9

Mota: Artikulua

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2013.64 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openSarbide irekia editor

Beste argitalpen batzuk: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Laburpena

Though the study of romantic attachment has expanded into all areas of psychology, it remains the case that there is no valid, reliable test available to measure it in Latin America. The present research objective was to adapt a Chilean version of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR; Brennan, Clark, & Shaver 1998) questionnaire, developing a short-form version, and to determine its factor structure in two samples of Chilean adults of different ages. A pool of 25 items was chosen to capture the two dimensions (Anxiety and Avoidance), which were obtained through principal components analysis in a sample of 477 adults. Subsequently, the short-form ECR�s two-dimensional structure was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis in a new sample (N = 296). All sub-dimensions� internal consistencies were found to be satisfactory. Evidence for the test�s concurrent validity with the variables age, gender, and socioeconomic status was also obtained. The dimensions of romantic attachment showed no differences according to age or gender. However, participants of high socioeconomic status exhibited lower levels of anxious attachment than those with low socioeconomic status. It was concluded that the Chilean short-form version of the ECR has good psychometric properties and is a suitable assessment of adult attachment.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Adimark GfK (2004). Mapa socioeconómico de Chile, nivel socioeconómico de los hogares del país basado en datos del Censo 2002 [Socioeconomic map of Chile, household socioeconomic status according to 2002 Census Data]. Santiago de Chile, Chile: Author. Retrieved from http://www.adimark.cl/medios/estudios/Mapa-Socioeconomico-de-Chile.pdf.
  • Alonso-Arbiol I., Balluerka N., & Shaver P. (2007). A Spanish version of the Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) adult attachment questionnaire. Personal Relationships, 14, 45-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00141.x.
  • Alonso-Arbiol I., Balluerka N., Shaver P., & Gillath O. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Spanish and American versions of the ECR adult attachment questionnaire: A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 9-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.9.
  • Alonso-Arbiol I., Shaver P. R., & Yárnoz S. (2002). Insecure attachment, gender roles, and interpersonal dependency in the Basque Country. Personal Relationships, 9, 479-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00030.
  • Alonso-Arbiol I., van de Vijver F. J. R., Shaver P. R., Azaiza F., Brassard A., Çelenk O., & Spencer R. (2010, July). Proceedings from the IARR Conference 2010: Culture and the dimensions of romantic attachment. Herzliya, Israel.
  • Bakermans-Kranenburg M., & van IJzendoorn M. (2009). No reliable gender differences in attachment across the lifespan. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 22-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0900003X.
  • Balluerka N., Gorostiaga A., Alonso-Arbiol I., & Haranburu M. (2007). La adaptación de instrumentos de medida de unas culturas a otras: Una perspectiva práctica [Test adaptation from one culture to another: A practical perspective]. Psicothema, 19, 124-133.
  • Bartholomew K., & Horowitz L. (1991). Attachment styles among young-adults: A test of a 4 category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226.
  • Bowby J. (1969/1998). El apego y la pérdida Vol. 1: El apego [Attachment and loss Vol. 1: Attachment]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
  • Bowlby J. (1980/1993). El apego y la pérdida Vol 3: La pérdida [Attachment and loss Vol. 3: Loss]. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós.
  • Brennan K., Clark C., & Shaver P. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. Simpson & W. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Byrne B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cassidy J., Ziv Y., Mehta T. G., & Feeney B. C. (2003). Feedback seeking in children and adolescents: Associations with self-perceptions, attachment representations, and depression. Child Development, 74, 612-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.7402019.
  • Del-Giudice M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193-214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167210392789.
  • Drake K. E., Sheffield D., & Shingler D. (2011). The relationship between adult romantic attachment anxiety, the experience of negative life events, and compliance. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 742-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.034.
  • Fernández A. M., Dufey M., & Kramp U. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) in Chile: Empathy in a different cultural context. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 179-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000065.
  • Fraley R. C., Waller N. G., & Brennan K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350.
  • Gallarin M., & Alonso-Arbiol I. (in press). Dimensionality of the Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment (IPPA): Evaluation with the Spanish version. Spanish Journal of Psychology.
  • Garrido L., Santelices M. P., Pierrehumbert B., & Armijo I. (2009). Validación chilena del cuestionario de evaluación de apego en el adulto CAMIR [Chilean validation of the CAMIR adult attachment assessment]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 41, 81-98.
  • George C., Kaplan N., & Main M. (1985). The Adult Attachment Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  • Gorostiaga A., Balluerka N., Alonso-Arbiol I., & Haranburu M. (2011). Validation of the Basque Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27, 193-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000067.
  • Guerra Vio C., Castro Arancibia L., & Vargas Castro J. (2011). Examen psicométrico del Cuestionario de Clima Social del Centro Escolar en estudiantes chilenos [Psychometric test of the School Social Climate Questionnaire in Chilean students]. Psicothema, 23, 140-145.
  • Hambleton R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: Progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229-244.
  • Hazan C., & Shaver P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.
  • Hofstede G. (1998). Masculinity and Femininity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hofstede G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hoyle R. H. (Ed.) (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lafontaine M. F., & Lussier Y. (2003). Structure bidimensionnelle de l'attachement amoureux: Anxiété face à l'abandon et évitement de l'intimité [The two-dimensional structure of romantic attachment: Abandonment anxiety and intimacy avoidance]. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 35, 56-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0087187.
  • Little T. D., Cunningham W. A., Shahar G., & Widaman K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902-1.
  • Lopez F. G., & Gormley B. (2002). Stability and change in adult attachment style over the first-year college transition: Relations to self-confidence, coping, and distress patterns. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 355-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.3.355.
  • Lopez F. G., Mauricio A. M., Gormley B., Simko T., & Berger E. (2001). Adult attachment orientations and college student distress: The mediating role of problem coping styles. Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 459-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01993.x.
  • Martínez C., & Santelices M. P. (2005). Evaluación del apego en el adulto: Una revisión [Evaluation of adult attachment: A review]. Psykhe, 14, 181-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282005000100014.
  • Mikulincer M., & Shaver P. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Obegi J. H., Morrison T. L., & Shaver P. R. (2004). Exploring intergenerational transmission of attachment style in young female adults and their mothers. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 625-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407504045891.
  • Olsson I., Sorebo O., & Dahl A. (2010). The Norwegian version of the experiences in close relationships measure of adult attachment: Psychometric properties and normative data. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 64, 340-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/08039481003728586.
  • Shaver P. R., Belsky J., & Brennan K. A. (2000). The adult attachment interview and self-reports of romantic attachment: Associations across domains and methods. Personal Relationships, 7, 25-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00002.x.
  • Shaver P. R., & Mikulincer M. (2002). Dialogue on adult attachment: Diversity and integration. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 243-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616730210157484.
  • Shaver P. R., Mikulincer M., Alonso-Arbiol I., & Lavy S. (2010). Assessment of adult attachment across cultures: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In P. Erdman, K. M. Ng, & S. Metzger (Eds.), Attachment: Expanding the cultural connections (pp. 89-108). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  • Treboux D., Crowell J. A., & Waters E. (2004). When "new" meets "old:" Configurations of adult attachment representations and their implications for marital functioning. Developmental Psychology, 40, 295-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.295.
  • Tsagarakis M., Kafetsios K., & Stalikas A. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Greek version of the revised experience in close relationships measure of adult attachment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 47-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.1.47.
  • van IJzendoorn M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg M. J. (2010). Invariance of adult attachment across gender, age, culture, and socioeconomic status? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 200-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360908.
  • Vogel D. L., & Wei M. (2005). Adult attachment and helpseeking intent: The mediating roles of psychological distress and perceived social support. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 347-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.347.
  • Wongpakaran T., Wongpakaran N., & Wedding D. (2011). Gender differences, attachment styles, self-esteem and romantic relationships in Thailand. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 409-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.12.001.
Datuen iturria: Dialnet