Fuentes de conocimiento en los procesos de innovación empresariallas spin-off universitarias en Andalucía

Referencias bibliográficas

• Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B. y Feldman, M. P. (1994): “R&D spillovers and recipient firm size”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336-340.
• Agrawal, A. y Henderson, R. (2002): “Putting Patents in context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT”, Management Science, 48, 44-60.
• Autio, E. (1997): “New technology-based firms in innovation networks”, Research Policy, 26, 263-281.
• Autio, E. y Lumme, A. (1998): “Does the innovator role affect the perceived potencial for growth? Analysis of four types of new technology-based firms”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 41-54.
• Barney, J. (1991): “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
• Barney, J.; Wright, M. y Ketchen, D. (2001): “The resource based view: 10 years after”, Journal of Management, 27, 625-642.
• Bellini, E.; Capaldo, G.; Edström, A.; Kaulio, M.; Raffa, M.; Riccardia, M. y Zollo, G. (1999): “Strategic paths of academic spin-offs: A Comparative Analysis of Italian and Swedish Cases”, 44th ICSB Conference, Naples, 20-23 June.
• Bender, G. y Laestadius, S. (2005): “Non science based innovativeness: on cased a pabilities relevant to generate pro-fitable novelty”, en Bender, G., Ja-cobson, D., y Robertson, P. L. (eds.), “Non-Research- Intensive Industries in the Knowledge Economy”, Journal for Perspectives on Economic Political and Social Integration, 11, 123-170.
• Bower, D. (2003): “Business model fashion and the academic spinout firm”, R&D Management, 33, 97-105.
• Brush, C. G.; Greene, P. G. y Hart, M. M. (2001): “From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial cha-llenge of constructing a resource base”, Academy of Management Exe-cutive, 15, 64-78.
• Caloghirou, Y.; Kastelli, I. y Tsakanikas, A. (2004): “Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: comple-ments or substitutes for innovative performance?”, Technovation, 24, 29-39.
• Carayannis, E.; Rogers, E.; Kurihara, K. y Allbritton, M. (1998): “High techno-logy spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research institutes”, Technovation, 18, 1-10.
• Cassiman, B. y Veugelers, R. (2006): “In search of complementarity in inno-vation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition”, Ma-nagement Science, 52, 68-82.
• Chesbrough, H. y Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002): “The role of business model in captu-ring value from innovation”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529-544.
• Chiesa, V. y Piccaluga, A. (2000): “Exploita-tion and diffusion of public research: the general framework and the case of academic spin-off companies”, R&D Management, 30, 329-340.
• Clarysse, B.; Heirman, A. y Degroof, J. (2000): “An Institutional and Resour-ce Based Explanation of Growth Pat-terns of Research based Spin-Offs in Europe”, Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Studies, 545-559.
• Clarysse, B.; Wright, M.; Lockett, A.; van de Velde, E. y Vohora, A. (2005): “Spin-ning out new ventures: a typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions”, Journal of Bu-siness Venturing, 20, 183-216.
• Cohen, W. M. y Levinthal, D. (1989): “In-novation and Learning: the two faces of R&D”, The Economic Journal, 99, 569-596.
• Cohen, W. M. y Levinthal, D. (1990): “Ab-sorptive-capacity-a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Admi-nistrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
• Cohen, W. M.; Florida, R.; Randazzese, L. y Walsh, J. (1998): “Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance”, en R. Noll (eds.), Challenges to Research Universities, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
• Cohen, W. M.; Nelson, R. y Walsh, J. (2002): “Links and Impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D”, Management Science, 48, 1-23.
• Druilhe, C. y Garnsey, E. (2004): “Do acade-mic spin-outs differ and does it mat-ter?”, Journal of Technology Transfer,29, 269-285.
• Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (1997): Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of Academic-Industry-Government Relations, Lon-don, Cassell.
• Fontes, M. (2001): “Biotechnology entre-preneurs and technology transfer in a intermediate economy”, Technolo-gical Forecasting and Social Change,62, 59-74.
• Freel, M. (2003): “Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity”, Research Policy, 32, 751-770.Freel, M. (2005): “Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms”, Technova-tion, 25, 123-134.
• Grimpe, C. y Sofka, W. (2009): “Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Lowand high-technology sectors in European countries”, Research Policy, 38, 495-506.
• Gibbons, M.; Limoges, C.; Nowotny, H.; Schwartzman, S.; Scott, P. y Trow, M. (1994): The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London, Sage Publications.
• Heirman, A. y Clarysse, B. (2004): “How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 247-268.
• Hellmann, T. y Puri, M. (2000): “The interaction between product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital”, Review of Financial Studies, 13, 959-984.
• Hindle, K. y Yencken, J. (2004): “Public re- search commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: an integrated model”, Technovation, 24, 793-803.
• Katila, R. (2002): “New product search over time: past ideas in their prime?”, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 995-1010.
• Katila, R. y Ahuja, G. (2002): “Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behaviour and new product introduction”, Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183- 1194.
• Kline, S. y Rosenberg, N. (1986): “An overview of innovation”, en Landau, R. y Rosenberg, N. (eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, National Academic Press.
• Klofsten, M. y Jones-Evans, D. (2000): “Comparing Academic Entrepreneurship in Europe -The Case of Sweden and Ireland”, Small Business Economics, 14, 299-309.
• Lane, P. J.; Koka, B. R. y Pathak, S. (2006): “The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct”, Academy of Management Review, 31, 833-863.
• Laursen, K. y Salter, A. (2006): “Open for Innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovative performance among U.K. manufacturing firms”, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131-150.
• Lindelhof, P. y Lofsten, H. (2004): “Proximity as a resource base for competitive advantage: university-industry links for technology transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 311-326.
• Link, A. L. y Rees, J. (1990): “Firm size, university based research, and the returns to R&D”, Small Business Economics, 2, 25-31.
• March, J. C. (1991): “Exploration and exploitation in organization learning”, Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
• Meyer, M. (2003): “Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms”, R&D Management, 33, 107-115.
• Moray, N. y Clarysse, B. (2005): “Institutional change and resource endowments to science-based entrepreneurial firms”, Research Policy, 34, 1010-1027.
• Mowery, D. C. (1983): “The relationship between intrafirm and contractual forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 1900-1940”, Exploration in Economics History, 20, 351-374.
• Mustar, P. (1997): “Spin-off enterprises: how French academies create hi-tech companies: the condition for success or failure”, Science and Public Policy, 24, 37-43.
• Mustar, P. (2000): “New business venturing by researchers”, Bordeaux, 9-10 March.
• Mustar, P. (2002): “Public support for the spin-off companies from higher educations and research institution”, Conference STRATA Brussels, 22-23 April 2002.
• Mustar, P.; Renault, M.; Colombo, M.; Piva, E.; Fontes, M.; Lockett, A.; Wright, M.; Clarysse, B. y Moray, N. (2006): “Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multidimensional taxonomy”, Research Policy, 35, 289-308.
• Nicolaou, N. y Birley, S. (2003): “Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts”, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 333-359.
• OCDE (2005): Manual de Oslo. Directrices para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación.
• OCDE (1997): Révision des classifications des secteurs et des produits de haute technologie. Doc. OCDE/GD (97)216.
• Perkmann, M. y Walsh, K. (2007): “University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda”, International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259-280.
• Pirnay, F. (1998): “What are we talking about when we talk about spin-off? A review of the literature”, 4ème Colloque International Francophone sur la PME, Metz Nancy, 22-24 October.
• Pirnay, F.; Surlemont, B. y Nlemvo, F. (2003): “Toward a Tipology of University Spinoff”, Small Business Economics, 21, 355-369.
• Rappert, B.; Webster, A. y Charles, D. (1999): “Making Sense of Diversity and Reluctance: Academic-Industrial Relations and Intellectual Property”, Research Policy, 28, 873-890.
• Romijn, H. y Albaladejo, M. (2002): “Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England”, Research Policy, 31, 1053-1067.
• Santamaría, L.; Nieto, M. J. y Barge-Gil, A. (2009): “Beyond formal R&D: Taking advantage of other sources of innova- tion in lowand mediumtechnology industries”, Research Policy, 38, 507- 517.
• Scholten, V.; Omta, O. y Elfring, T. (2001): “The significance of partenthood: the social capital of the parent organization and the entrepreneurial outcome”. Rent XV Conference, Finland.
• Shan, W.; Walker, G. y Kogut, B. (1994): “Interfirm cooperation and start-up innovation in the biotechnology industry”, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387-394.
• Shane, S. y Stuart, T. (2002): “Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups”, Management Science, 48, 154-170.
• Smirlor, R.; Gibson, D. y Dietrich, B. (1990): “Spin-Out Companies: Technology Start-ups from UT-Austin”, Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 63-76.
• Stankiewicz, R. (1994): “University firms: Spin-off companies from universities”, Science and Public Policy, 21, 99-107.
• Steffensen, M.; Rogers, E. M. y Speakman, K. (2000): “Spin-offs from research centers at a research university”, Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 93- 111.
• Tidd, J. y Trewhella, M. (1997): “Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning”, R&D Management, 24, 359- 375.
• Tidd, J. (2000): From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence: Measuring Technological, Market and Organisational Innovation, London, Imperian College Press.
• Wright, M.; Vohor, A. y Lockett, A. (2004): “Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 235-246.
• Zott, C. y Amit, R. (2005): “Business Model” en Hitt, M. y Ireland, D. (eds.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management. Entrepreneurship, 3, 20-24, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.