Los efectos de la retroalimentación correctiva oral y la ansiedad sobre el desarrollo de la pronunciación

  1. María Luquin 1
  2. Hanne Roothooft 2
  1. 1 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
    info

    Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

    Lejona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/000xsnr85

  2. 2 Universidad Pública de Navarra
    info

    Universidad Pública de Navarra

    Pamplona, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z0cah89

Revista:
Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada

ISSN: 1576-5059

Año de publicación: 2019

Número: 19

Páginas: 41-70

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada

Resumen

Si bien una gran cantidad de estudios han demostrado que la retroalimentación correctiva oral (RC) es efectiva para la adquisición de la gramática en un idioma extranjero, muy pocos se han centrado en el impacto de la RC en el desarrollo de la pronunciación. Además, escasea la investigación de RC que tenga en cuenta las diferencias individuales, como la ansiedad en el aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera. Por lo tanto, el presente estudio investigó los efectos de las reformulaciones y la retroalimentación metalingüística sobre la pronunciación de la terminación de pasado -ed, comparando 30 estudiantes de ansiedad alta y baja con un nivel A2 + de inglés en una escuela secundaria de España. Un diseño pretest/ post-test consistente en una lectura en voz alta y una narración fue llevado a cabo con un grupo de reformulación (n=10), un grupo de retroalimentación metalingüística (n=10) y un grupo de control (n=10). Cada uno de los tres grupos fue subdividido en un grupo de ansiedad alta (n = 5) y otro de ansiedad baja (n = 5). Se encontraron diferencias significativas entre el grupo de reformulación y el grupo de control, lo cual confirma investigación previa que demuestra que las reformulaciones son beneficiosas para el desarrollo de la pronunciación. Sin embargo, a pesar de ciertas indicaciones de que los estudiantes con ansiedad baja se beneficiaron más de la RC, y los estudiantes con ansiedad elevada parecieron beneficiarse especialmente de las reformulaciones, no se pudieron identificar diferencias significativas entre los grupos de ansiedad en este estudio.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(4), 543-574. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060268.
  • Awan, R. N., Azher, M., Anwar, M. N., & Naz, A. (2010). An investigation of foreign language classroom anxiety and its relationship with students’ achievement. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v7i11.249.
  • Chowdhury, S. (2013). Hansel and Gretel. Retrieved March 2, 2017 from https:// prezi.com/lzjztgn3g1wd/a-poor-woodcutter-and-his-wife-had-twochildren-named-hansel/ DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x.
  • Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective feedback and L2 vocabulary development: Prompts and recasts in the adult ESL classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787-815. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.6.787.
  • Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp.339-360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990544.
  • Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060141.
  • Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127-165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000708.
  • Gooch, R., Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60, 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.007.
  • Guenther, L. (n.d). Little Red Riding Hood. Retrieved March 2, 2017 from http:// www.dltk-teach.com/rhymes/littlered/story.htm
  • Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36(4), 543-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588240.
  • Hashemi, M., & Abbasi, M. (2013). The role of the teacher in alleviating anxiety in language classes. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(3), 640-646.
  • Horwitz, E., Horwitz, B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
  • Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form of –te i (ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54(2), 311-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00257.x.
  • Krashen, S.D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J.M. (2005). Error correction: students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language Awareness, 14, 112-127.
  • Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), 37-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000020.
  • Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: a meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 309-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00561.x.
  • Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386.
  • Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp.361- 377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034.
  • Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520.
  • Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365.
  • Mackey, A., Gass, S.M., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022.
  • Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp.407- 453). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 338-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01211.x.
  • McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(1), 79-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050047.
  • McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies (pp.323-338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McDonough, K., & Mackey, a. (2006). Responses to recasts: repetition, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56(4), 693-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00393.x.
  • Mohammadi, M. A. (2014). Corrective feedback interventions and EFL learners’ pronunciation: A case of –s or –es ending words. International Journal of Learning & Development, 4(1), 40 – 58.
  • Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00142.
  • Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education. Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002.
  • Roothooft, H. (2014). Oral corrective feedback: Its effects on the acquisition of English, teaching practices and teachers’ and students’ beliefs. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. A meta-analysis of the research. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 233-164). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012a). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00639.x.
  • Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012b). Investigating the pedagogical potential of recasts for L2 vowel acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.25.
  • Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.x.
  • Szyszka, M. (2016). Pronunciation learning strategies and language anxiety. In search of an interplay. Cham: Springer. Truscott, J. (1999). What’s wrong with oral grammar correction? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 437-455. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.55.4.457
  • Topic Resources (n.d). Snow White and the Seven Dwarves. [Online image]. Retrieved March 2, 2017 from http://topicresources.com/ourshop/prod_1214053-Snow-White-and-the-Seven-Dwarves.html Vitanova, G., & Miller, A. (2002). Reflective practice in pronunciation learning. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(1).
  • Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 235-263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990519.
  • Yilmaz, Y. (2012). The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62(4), 1134-1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x.
  • Yoshida, R. (2010). How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 293-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01022.x.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet